Posted on 02/15/2015 8:54:01 AM PST by pinochet
Do You Remember Bill Clinton's Bimbo Eruption in 1992-1998? First of all, the mainstream media did not tell the full story of all the sex allegations against Clinton during his presidency. The cases that received MSM publicity were those of Monica Lewinsky, Jenifer Flowers, Paula Jones, Kathleen Willey, Juanita Broaddrick and Elizabeth Ward Gracen. These cases were a mere 5 percent of the allegations made. The other 95 percent did not receive MSM publicity. One tabloid at that time, claimed that Clinton produced illegitimate children, an allegation the MSM ignored.
The New York Post of February 14, 2015 has even more shocking new allegations against Clinton that have been ignored by the MSM. Clinton's links with the pedophile Billionaire, Jeffrey Epstein, are well documented. Here is the New York Post article:
http://nypost.com/2015/02/14/bill-clintons-libido-threatens-to-derail-hillary-again/
Because A - everybody already knows he’s a horndog scumbag, and B there are no specific accusers only a general association.
Most of my co-workers are Democrats and they’re all excited about Hillary. I cautioned them that she was the overwhelming frontrunner back in 2008 too until an unknown senator from Illinois tripped her up. I warned them to be on the lookout for Elizabeth Warren and they laughed it off. All of Bill’s sex scandals could be excused away by their media lapdogs, but since this one involves underage girls this has the potential to blow Bill out of the water and sink Hillary’s presidential chances. We’ll see. Time will tell.
That picture doesn’t look right to me the lighting of the woman don’t match with the men.
Time for the I am shocked photo.
The traditional Clinton tactic is to leak scandalous news early so it doesn’t interfere with things later.
This info coming out in 2016 close to elections could hurt them.
If the “New York Post” is publishing this now I guess they are doing the Clinton work helping to leak it early.
>>>Time for the I am shocked photo
How about this 2012 photo of Clinton with porn stars? Here is the article and photo:
http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/05/bill-clinton-poses-with-porn-stars/
The photo only: http://abcnews.go.com/images/Politics/ht_bill_clinton_porn_stars_lpl_120524_wblog.jpg
Because Mrs. Bill CLinton wants to be President and thus none of Mr. Bill’s misadventures is appropriate for public acknowledgement. Cosby is not a Democrat running for President and is a terrible annoyance to the Left because of his views vis a vis the decadence and dependence of the Negro community.
EE is right. There was nothing in the Post article about any women complaining about Clinton. Many are complaining about Cosby.
We all know Clinton is sleazy, but in order to make a comparison about Clinton and Cosby being treated differently, at present, it appears that’s because it’s an entirely different situation.
Don’t worry. Clinton will eventually trip himself up again, but the Post piece is a hit piece. It’s a bull rag, similar to most of the similar rags on the other side.
Unbelieveable. Note how the news guy deflects any unfavorable attachment saying everyone is asked to pose from time to time with people they don’t know. RIGHT, but in Bubba’s case I bet if I wanted to have a picture taken with him, not that I would, I would have to ante up big bucks. I wonder if these bimbos anted up big bucks (carefully spelled) for him!
It's not a double standard.
You just don't understand the principle their single standard is meant to uphold.
Convicted pedophile Jeffrey Epstein provided teenaged sex slaves .. Slavery is morally approved by the Clintons? — pedophile who ensnared girls as young as 14 into his private sex ring .. and Ron Burkle long kept his private plane stocked with young girls who could not legally give consent ... statuary rape .
True, so why didn't the MSM go after Cosby then? My guess is that they were too busy tearing down GWB as a prelude to making sure the GOP lost the House in '06.
Now if I were a conspiracy theorist I would take it a step further and say the jig was up in '06 that Obama was going to be the nominee in '08, and so the MSM didn't want to bring up any black-male issues that might rub off on Obama. But I don't think that is necessary; it could just as well be that attacking Cosby in '06 would have reminded people of Bill Clinton's antics and rubbed off on Hillary. The simplest theory is that the MSM was too busy tearing down Bush to worry about much else.
Because the media doesn’t want to go after Cosby, and never has.
The reason the story broke this time is the internet and Cosby’s remarkable mistake when that comedian brought it up, his lawyers and the MSM could not bury it this time.
“The Bill Cosby #CosbyMeme Hashtag Backfired Immediately”
(November)On Monday, Bill Cosby — or more likely one of his representatives — posted a tweet asking fans to meme him. The link led to a meme generator on billcosby.com.
Go ahead. Meme me! http://t.co/uM3KSji8or #CosbyMeme
— BillCosby (@Bill Cosby)
Right away, Twitter users began subverting the meme generator to comment on the 2006 rape allegations against Cosby. (He has never been charged with sexual assault.)
.@BillCosby This is fun! #CosbyMeme
I vote “the libs have wanted to get Cosby ever since the Pound of Cake speech”.
Cosby had the gaul to denigrate the ghetto / welfare culture.
2006 is pre-social media. It has NOT been the media taking down Cosby, it’s been Facebook and Youtube and TMZ and PEOPLE sharing the small stories and clips. The media, other than a few web outlets, generally ones that cover entertainment news, studiously ignored it until there were over a dozen women. Finally at that point the story was big enough the MSM couldn’t ignore it anymore.
The reality is the media wasn’t interested in the story. They weren’t in 2006, and it proved to have legs of its own they weren’t this time either. The fun part about the modern world (as Cosby and Goodell have learned recently) is that the media no longer gets to decide if something is a story anymore, and cellphone video of a comedian on youtube can become a story with no help from the media at all.
Well .. he’s no hero to me .. or to America.
I appreciate the elder Bush taking Bill under his wing and setting him on a better path .. but Bush only did it to PROTECT THE PRESIDENCY .. and not necessarily to affect Hillary in any way.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.