Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Commentary: Tyson's 'Cosmos' has not been impressive
The Bradenton Herald ^ | March 23, 2014 | Marty Clear

Posted on 03/23/2014 8:26:24 PM PDT by EveningStar

...Jonathan Sabin of Bradenton's Local Group of Deep Sky Observers has met Tyson, and said he's a "gigantic presence."

"The guy is one of the most engaging people I've ever met," Sabin said. "He walks in and he just owns the room."

On "Cosmos," though, Tyson comes off as a stiff, even bland. He's reading someone else's words -- specifically, those of Ann Druyan, Sagan's widow and the co-writer of the original "Cosmos" -- and so far it's not working...

(Excerpt) Read more at bradenton.com ...


TOPICS: Astronomy; Chit/Chat; Science; TV/Movies
KEYWORDS: anndruyan; commentary; cosmos; neildegrassetyson
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041 next last
To: kingu

I think it’s Seth McFarland not Matt Groening!


21 posted on 03/23/2014 8:53:41 PM PDT by Empireoftheatom48 (God help the Republic but will he?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Empireoftheatom48

22 posted on 03/23/2014 8:57:44 PM PDT by smokingfrog ( sleep with one eye open (<o> ---)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Viennacon

I find the series so far to annoy me. Tyson doesn’t have a natural, strong voice and (not being an actor) he just reads lines in a script. He calls something a fact, like that settles it. Except for facts that later turn out be be non-facts. And the computer graphics, the stupid space/time/dimension craft he flies in, the cartoon religion bashing. And the commercial interruptions.


23 posted on 03/23/2014 8:58:22 PM PDT by Procyon (Decentralize, degovernmentalize, deregulate, demonopolize, decredentialize, disentitle.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Procyon

Thankfully, its a turkey, so his CGI theatrics and attacks will be footnotes of broadcasting history.


24 posted on 03/23/2014 9:02:41 PM PDT by Viennacon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Viennacon

True. If this were on PBS, it would be repeated ad nauseum.

Did PBS pass on this because they knew it was going to be a turkey?


25 posted on 03/23/2014 9:06:21 PM PDT by Kirkwood (Zombie Hunter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Kirkwood

I think they must have known that most Americans today are glued to Honey Boo Boo and Dance Moms.


26 posted on 03/23/2014 9:27:06 PM PDT by Viennacon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Empireoftheatom48
I think it’s Seth McFarland not Matt Groening!

DOH!

27 posted on 03/23/2014 9:28:59 PM PDT by Mike Darancette (Do The Math)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: EveningStar

I so looked forward to this show, -—sighs


28 posted on 03/23/2014 9:30:15 PM PDT by Mike Darancette (Do The Math)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Empireoftheatom48

You’re right, it is Seth McFarland. My mistake.


29 posted on 03/23/2014 9:31:42 PM PDT by kingu (Everything starts with slashing the size and scope of the federal government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: EveningStar

Heh, I know John. Nice guy, well spoken. I’m more interested in the show as an outside observer hoping for something that kindles interest in astronomy and science, but the vibe I’ve been getting from people about it has not been terribly positive. The visuals are great, but it seems to misfire elsewhere, especially the constant use of cartoons.


30 posted on 03/23/2014 9:36:39 PM PDT by messierhunter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EveningStar

Mrs. Fierro heard me watching episode 2 and asked, “what, is this some sort of comedy?”


31 posted on 03/23/2014 9:40:06 PM PDT by martin_fierro (< |:)~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TBP; RIghtwardHo; All
I like the show too, but not without reservations.

Tyson is excellent - most of the time, but not all the time.

And the use of cartoons is bad.

Thus far, I give it **½ out of ****. I would give the 1980 show **** out of ****.

32 posted on 03/23/2014 9:56:01 PM PDT by EveningStar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: EveningStar

The tone was set with deliberate falsehoods about Brutus and the church. I predict more and, ore global warming environmental propoganda heading our way. These people simply can not stop thmselves. I won’t waste my time.


33 posted on 03/24/2014 1:10:17 AM PDT by Organic Panic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EveningStar

I stopped paying too much attention when Tyson referred to Comets as dirty snowballs when we’ve known for almost ten years now, after numerous fly-bys, a couple of probe touch-downs, and the Deep Impact Space Mission where we Rammed Comet Tempel 1 with a 600 pound hunk of copper, that there is no ice or water on any comet we’ve encountered, and, except for their orbit, they are essentially indistinguishable from any other asteroid. If he insists on sticking to outdated, falsified science on that, then how much of the rest is worth watching? How much credibility can I give to ANYTHING else the man says? I decided very little.


34 posted on 03/24/2014 2:00:50 AM PDT by Swordmaker (This tag line is a Microsoft insult free zone... but if the insults to Mac users continue...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EveningStar

It’s so disappointing. The man has no gravitas and talks like he’s talking to 6 year olds instead of adults. I don’t remember Sagan presenting opinion so often and so far left during his cosmos run.

episode 3 and I’ve removed it from my recording schedule.


35 posted on 03/24/2014 2:49:51 AM PDT by Usagi_yo (Journalticion -- journalist + politician. Used to be called propagandist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Swordmaker

Pretty sure your information is incorrect regarding ice and water in comets.


36 posted on 03/24/2014 4:27:31 AM PDT by Fuzz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Organic Panic

It’s especially insulting when, on the second show on evolution, they attempt to steal Christian terms like “Tree of Life”, and repurpose them for purely secular use.


37 posted on 03/24/2014 4:38:12 AM PDT by Carlucci
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Carlucci

Cultures and religions long before Christianity had stories about a tree of life.


38 posted on 03/24/2014 4:53:56 AM PDT by Fuzz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Fuzz
Cultures and religions long before Christianity had stories about a tree of life.

Dozens and dozens of cultures and religions used trees in their symbolism, including many predating Christianity, like ancient Egypt, ancient Persia, ancient China. Even mesoamerican cultures used the symbolism of a tree to depict life.

39 posted on 03/24/2014 6:24:50 AM PDT by Thermalseeker (If ignorance is bliss how come there aren't more happy people?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Usagi_yo

Watched the first episode with my kids (high school age) -not bad. Second episode - boring. 3rd episode - after the first five minutes - we switched to DVR’d Jeopardy. Removed series from recording list. No new science, bad cartoons, boring host, leftist agenda. Too bad - I was hoping is was gonna be good.


40 posted on 03/24/2014 6:25:25 AM PDT by privatedrive
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson