Posted on 02/04/2014 6:23:18 AM PST by GregNH
Isn’t The Hague where the world court is held? Maybe they will keep BO for trial.
She really should stand down. She does not prepare her cases well. That makes the issues to be decided lose credibility with the court. That leaves her where she is today.
S.o.S. Bennett attached a copy of the WHLFBC, and Onaka verified that the information on Bennett's copy matched the information on the Hawaiian original. That would include the physician information. The 12 enumerated items in Onaka's verification respond only to those items expressly listed by Bennett in his request.
In any event, the physician tidbit is irrelevant to the eligibility question.
Then why not provide a BC to Bennett? Why delay for months? Why consult with attorneys before producing a cleverly worded “verification letter”?
...Take a look at the Hawaiian law below this post about the laws that governed Obama's birf. LoL
What it says above for all you Obama BS'er out there:
The HI statute that was in effect from 1955 to 1982.
"Section 57-9 Local registrar to prepare birth certificate.
(a) If neither parent as above provided is able to prepare a birth certificate, the local registrar shall secure the necessary information from any person having knowledge of the birth and prepare and file the certificate."
Amendments or even the birf record about an Hawaiian birth can be made at anytime in the future whether that it is 6 months after the alleged Hawaiian birth or it is 60 years after the alleged [or BS Obama birf] Hawaiian birth.
Is your interest group still active or has it disbanded?
They affirm the information is "On Record", which is a distinctly different thing than affirming it is accurate.
The lies on *MY* birth certificate are also "On Record", but they are still not true.
Even if one were to believe that, there is still this thing we call the U.S. Constitution that says in part:
Full faith and credit shall be given in each state to the public acts, records, and judicial proceedings of every other state.
The Framers didn't add in "but this doesn't apply if certain persons express doubt about State X's records."
If you're going to be a defender of the Constitution, then you have to uphold it all its parts, and not disregard a provision when for expediency it doesn't suit your arguments.
Gallup - I dont know what youre talking about. I have not written a letter. Neither Mike nor I have asked her to stand down. I dont know where it came from It is an absolute fabrication. I have never nor would I ever write such a letter.
Exposed: Orly Taitz Sent Stand-Down Letter; An Absolute Fabrication; Obot Tricks
Uh oh. Looks like CpnHook has been busy again.
Yeah, "full faith and credit" from people who cover up calculated lies.
I see that several Dems are not running for Congress in 2014. I think this may have something to do with the March information(among other BO/BS). Could March 19 be connected to any or all states having a Senate/Rep deadline to run for election? Just an idea. Those who bail will still be gone soon. Those who register for election and get caught up in this information war may devastate their career/election. Could force a Senate slaughter for the R’s.
Just my opinion/idea.
There is no way for a public records custodian to verify accuracy of records of which he (nor anyone else in the records office) have firsthand knowledge of their creation. A public records officer testifies only as to what the records indicate. The law presumes the integrity and bona fides of the information by virtue of it being part of a system of records created and maintained under the auspices of that office.
You won't accept this explanation. I'm again merely pointing out why most people (including all judges, congresspersons, etc.) do and will.
Full faith and credit could be extended to the only document produced by Hawaii: Onaka’s letter.
Dem bill would end death penalty for federal law.
There has been not a single charge of treason in this country since the 50's. So why would the dems in congress all of a sudden want to visit the penalty for that crime?
Then why not?
answwer fro,m all kookaid drinking Obots:
Because no court has asked him to. *Snicker* haha.
That's what we get with a country full of corruption right OBot? The way you guys like it.
No, Ray, in fact as to eligibility "Was B.H.O.II born in Hawaii?" is the entirely of the question. He either was or he wasn't. There's nothing "partial" about it.
But do tell if you disagree: what else needs to be asked?
Also, as has been thoroughly discussed on FR, matching does not imply completeness.
And I've already addressed this a few posts back:
That's one reason perhaps why Onaka used the words "matches the information" rather than "true and complete copy" as the Hawaiian original contains medical or other information that can't and wasn't released with the White House version.
Really, do try to keep up.
But as to that critical question Onaka's verification "A birth certificate is on file with the Department of Health indicating that Barack Hussein Obama, II was born in Honolulu, Hawaii" is complete.
It’s been discussed ad infinitum, “matching” is meaningless.
Here’s the short version: you present item “a” which matches my item “a”. You are unaware of my item “b”, which amends item “a”
answwer = Answer
>>No, Ray, in fact as to eligibility “Was B.H.O.II born in Hawaii?” is the entirely of the question. He either was or he wasn’t.
Alien parentage.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.