There is no way for a public records custodian to verify accuracy of records of which he (nor anyone else in the records office) have firsthand knowledge of their creation. A public records officer testifies only as to what the records indicate. The law presumes the integrity and bona fides of the information by virtue of it being part of a system of records created and maintained under the auspices of that office.
You won't accept this explanation. I'm again merely pointing out why most people (including all judges, congresspersons, etc.) do and will.
Then why not?
answwer fro,m all kookaid drinking Obots:
Because no court has asked him to. *Snicker* haha.
That's what we get with a country full of corruption right OBot? The way you guys like it.
It’s been discussed ad infinitum, “matching” is meaningless.
Here’s the short version: you present item “a” which matches my item “a”. You are unaware of my item “b”, which amends item “a”