Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Day 22 (Week #5) Zimmerman Trial – Witness Discussion Thread
The Conservative Treehouse ^ | July 10, 2013 | Sundance

Posted on 07/10/2013 5:15:07 AM PDT by Uncle Chip

Today, July 10th, is DAY #22 (of 5th week) State of Florida V. George Zimmerman case.

Yesterday began with a boom as defense expert witness, world renowned Dr Vincent Di Maio took to the stand to validate the forensic evidence supporting George Zimmerman’s version of the encounter with Trayvon Martin. However, the day ended with an even bigger THUNDERCLAP in an epic 10pm showdown as Don West took on both the State prosecutors and trial Judge Nelson after the jury was released. Ending with Judge Nelson, turning her back and walking out of court. Unreal. A great analysis of the events from yesterday is available HERE.

The late night argument, not by the State, but by Judge Nelson herself, regarding phone evidence authentication, is so weak and insufferably devoid of legal analysis it is absurd on its face. Then again, this is the same judge who said a few days ago, flippantly in open court, that evidence should be “shredded” (Dr. Bao notes) after use. D’oh

Essentially Nelson argued that the phone records (texts and pics from Trayvon) cannot be authenticated to have originated by the specific personage of Trayvon Martin (despite two security codes) because anyone could have sent them. Whiskey*Tango*Foxtrot !!

How can an email be used in a sex offender case? How can phone records be used in RICO cases? How can GPS evidence be used in Insurance Cases? How are photographs taken by perps used against them? Think about it.

You can’t argue that evidence cannot be admitted because someone else might have made the actual phone call; Someone else might have physically sent the email; Someone else actually accessed the website; Someone else might have been the driver of the car; Or, someone else could possibly have been behind the viewing lens of the camera etc.

No, that argument does not mean you can arbitrarily exclude evidence. And this was the basis for her argument (watch the video).

Sure, that’s an argument which can be presented to the jury by the other side, as a counter point to create doubt with the jury, but it can’t be a reasonable consideration for total evidence exclusion. Then again, this is Judge Nelson – who in multiple prior cases has a high historical propensity of being overruled by the 5th District Court of Appeals.

It should be noted the NAACP Annual National Convention starts in Orlando on Friday; Additionally, preparations are being made in/around Miami-Dade for a Wednesday defense wrapped up with a community/LEO preparation meeting yesterday.


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: george; georgezimmerman; trayvon; trayvonmartin; zimmerman
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,161-1,1801,181-1,2001,201-1,220 ... 2,381-2,382 next last
To: cuban leaf

>> in both cases the jury erred in needing more burden of proof on the prosecution satisfied and found “obviously guilty” defendents innocent.

Good point.


1,181 posted on 07/10/2013 10:51:12 AM PDT by Nervous Tick (Without GOD, men get what they deserve.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1141 | View Replies]

To: RummyChick

Judge getting snotty over GZ testifying..West objects


1,182 posted on 07/10/2013 10:51:14 AM PDT by RummyChick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1176 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau

GZ is going to testify? Or not?

I just want to slap the hag.

This judge is a flaming @SS beotch. And an ugly one, at that.


1,183 posted on 07/10/2013 10:51:14 AM PDT by XenaLee (The only good commie is a dead commie)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1171 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Chip

She’s going full bitch now.


1,184 posted on 07/10/2013 10:51:18 AM PDT by Ronald_Magnus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1167 | View Replies]

To: machogirl

Nasty b*tch.


1,185 posted on 07/10/2013 10:51:43 AM PDT by Fresh Wind (The last remnants of the Old Republic have been swept away.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1179 | View Replies]

To: All

What the hell is going on? Why does she have to know NOW whether he will testify or not?? Wonder if Corey needs to know?


1,186 posted on 07/10/2013 10:51:45 AM PDT by Fawn (In a World of Information, Ignorance is a Choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1178 | View Replies]

To: Ronald_Magnus

OMG. This is outrageous.


1,187 posted on 07/10/2013 10:51:55 AM PDT by Toespi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1184 | View Replies]

To: XenaLee

Idiot judge.


1,188 posted on 07/10/2013 10:52:34 AM PDT by RabidBartender
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1183 | View Replies]

To: Fresh Wind

She is full on witchy today. Her contempt for the Defense is on display.


1,189 posted on 07/10/2013 10:52:47 AM PDT by machogirl (First they came for my tagline)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1185 | View Replies]

To: Toespi

She is such a Bitch.


1,190 posted on 07/10/2013 10:52:49 AM PDT by fatima (Free Hugs Today :))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1187 | View Replies]

To: All

Someone needs to pray for the soul of that judge because from what I’ve seen, that *B* is going straight to hell for her behavior!


1,191 posted on 07/10/2013 10:52:53 AM PDT by Conservative145
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1150 | View Replies]

To: Toespi

now I’m pissed......


1,192 posted on 07/10/2013 10:52:56 AM PDT by advertising guy (Phoenix...........where a prick in the butt ain't sexual.............it's a cactus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1187 | View Replies]

To: Toespi

Look at all the smiles and smirks in the Trayvon side of viewers. I want to schmack them too.


1,193 posted on 07/10/2013 10:53:02 AM PDT by XenaLee (The only good commie is a dead commie)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1187 | View Replies]

To: RabidBartender

Bill S. -inquiry usually comes right before defense rests..not now


1,194 posted on 07/10/2013 10:53:09 AM PDT by RummyChick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1188 | View Replies]

Wow — judge was insisting that Zimmerman declare that he had not made the decision as to testify but the judge wanted the answer NOW.

West objected —

Judge overruled —

again and again


1,195 posted on 07/10/2013 10:53:18 AM PDT by Uncle Chip
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1178 | View Replies]

To: Elle Bee

Bookmark


1,196 posted on 07/10/2013 10:53:25 AM PDT by DocRock (All they that TAKE the sword shall perish with the sword. Matthew 26:52 Gun grabbers beware.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1175 | View Replies]

To: Toespi

I am sorry, I would be looking for immediate emergency remedy from a higher court, I would not be putting my client through this crap.


1,197 posted on 07/10/2013 10:53:26 AM PDT by Toespi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1187 | View Replies]

To: advertising guy

Judge trying to intimidate the defendant despite objections by defense.


1,198 posted on 07/10/2013 10:53:36 AM PDT by mountaineer1997 (ray lewis Praise Allah, Ray Lewis suspect)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1192 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Chip

Corey is smiling.


1,199 posted on 07/10/2013 10:53:49 AM PDT by Toespi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1195 | View Replies]

To: Fawn

Not that I’m overly experienced, but I have never seen nor heard of a Judge harassing the defendant like that. (except in my Family Court hearings)


1,200 posted on 07/10/2013 10:53:58 AM PDT by machogirl (First they came for my tagline)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1186 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,161-1,1801,181-1,2001,201-1,220 ... 2,381-2,382 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson