Posted on 01/17/2013 5:39:55 PM PST by Tolerance Sucks Rocks
Those of us concerned about the decaying credibility of Big Science were dismayed to learn that the whistleblower site Science Fraud has been shut down due to a barrage of legal threats against its operator. With billions of dollars in federal science funding hinging on the integrity of academic researchers, and billions more in health care dollars riding on the truthfulness of pharmaceutical research claims, the industry needs more websites like this, not fewer.
Regular readers of Retraction Watch, a watchdog site run by two medical reporters, got the news along with a story about the blogs anonymous editor, who has since come forward and identified himself as Professor Paul Brookes, a researcher at the University of Rochester. Operated as a crowdsourced reference site much like Wikipedia, Science Fraud, in its six months of operation, documented egregiously suspicious research results published in over 300 peer reviewed publications. Many were subsequently retracted, including a paper by an author whose lawyer sent Science Fraud a cease and desist letter.
Given the tens of millions of dollars in misappropriated research funds that financed this small sample of what is surely a larger problem and the cascading pollution of the scientific literature whenever fraudulent publications get cited, its a shame that this tip-of-of-the-iceberg effort at cleansing the muck is being shut down rather than expanded.
Attempts to interview Dr. Brookes were not successful. One can just imagine what he is going through for the sin of trying to shine a light into the dark corners of the guild that controls the flow of money, tenure, prestige, and publications in the insular world of Big Science...
(Excerpt) Read more at forbes.com ...
PING!
(( ping ))
Big Bump.
There is a lot of money and political power out there if only they can get scientific backing for their schemes and products. On the other hand, valid science doesn’t necessarily pay all that well.
I witnessed this phenom at close hand when I consulted with an R&D company. One of my contractors was a naturalized citizen and spoke a foreign language. He ran into an acquaintance from the old country at the R&D lab, who told him in their language of the pressures to produce, and how he had faked data to get by. We were then tasked with a decision whether to blow the whistle. I admit, I left it up to the contractor, since he was the one who witnessed it, giving him the names of the people to contact.
Those of us concerned about the decaying credibility of Big Science were dismayed to learn that the whistleblower site Science Fraud has been shut down due to a barrage of legal threats against its operator... Regular readers of Retraction Watch, a watchdog site run by two medical reporters, got the news along with a story about the blogs anonymous editor, who has since come forward and identified himself as Professor Paul Brookes, a researcher at the University of Rochester. Operated as a crowdsourced reference site much like Wikipedia, Science Fraud, in its six months of operation, documented egregiously suspicious research results published in over 300 peer reviewed publications. Many were subsequently retracted, including a paper by an author whose lawyer sent Science Fraud a cease and desist letter.A multi-list ping, first one in a while.
|
|
|
GGG managers are SunkenCiv, StayAt HomeMother & Ernest_at_the_Beach | |
Thanks Tolerance Sucks Rocks. |
|
|
· join · view topics · view or post blog · bookmark · post new topic · subscribe · | ||
Google news searches: exoplanet · exosolar · extrasolar · | ||
I wonder why they had to put “Illegal” in quotes.
Research fraud ping.
~bump~
Thanks ForGod’sSake.
Bookmarking
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.