Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Is this real?
Email | Unknown | Unknown

Posted on 07/18/2012 8:24:35 AM PDT by thesaleboat

At age 76 when you most need it, you are not eligible for cancer treatment see page 272

What Nancy Pelosi didn't want us to know until after the healthcare bill was passed. Remember she said, "pass it and then read it!!." Here it is! ______________________________ Obama Care Highlighted by Page Number THE CARE BILL HB 3200

JUDGE KITHIL IS THE 2ND OFFICIAL WHO HAS OUTLINED THESE PARTS OF THE CARE BILL.

Judge Kithil of Marble Falls, TX - highlighted the most egregious pages of HB3200

Please read this........ especially the reference to pages 58 & 59

JUDGE KITHIL wrote:

** Page 50/section 152: The bill will provide insurance to all non-U.S. residents, even if they are here illegally.

** Page 58 and 59: The government will have real-time access to an individual's bank account and will have the authority to make electronic fund transfers from those accounts.

** Page 65/section 164: The plan will be subsidized (by the government) for all union members, union retirees and for community organizations (such as the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now - ACORN).

** Page 203/line 14-15: The tax imposed under this section will not be treated as a tax. (How could anybody in their right mind come up with that?)

** Page 241 and 253: Doctors will all be paid the same regardless of specialty, and the government will set all doctors' fees.

** Page 272. section 1145: Cancer hospital will ration care according to the patient's age.

** Page 317 and 321: The government will impose a prohibition on hospital expansion; however, communities may petition for an exception.

** Page 425, line 4-12: The government mandates advance-care planning consultations. Those on Social Security will be required to attend an "end-of-life planning" seminar every five years. (Death counseling..)

** Page 429, line 13-25: The government will specify which doctors can write an end-of-life order.

HAD ENOUGH????

Judge Kithil then goes on to identify:

"Finally, it is specifically stated that this bill will not apply to members of Congress. Members of Congress are already exempt from the Social Security system, and have a well-funded private plan that covers their retirement needs. If they were on our Social Security plan, I believe they would find a very quick 'fix' to make the plan financially sound for their future."

- Honorable David Kithil of Marble Falls , Texas

All of the above should give you the ammo you need to support your opposition to obamacare. Please send this information on to all of your email contacts.

All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. -- Edmund Burke


TOPICS: Conspiracy; Health/Medicine; Society
KEYWORDS: deathcare; deathpanels; healthplan; insurance; mandate; obama; obamacare; rinoromney; romneybringsdeath; romneycare; romneydeathpanels; socializedmedicine
I just got this email, was wondering if anyone knows if these are actually stated in obamacare.
1 posted on 07/18/2012 8:24:46 AM PDT by thesaleboat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: thesaleboat

Since no one has read it, who knows?


2 posted on 07/18/2012 8:27:16 AM PDT by saganite (What happens to taglines? Is there a termination date?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thesaleboat

these folks say it is not. http://www.snopes.com/politics/medical/kithil.asp


3 posted on 07/18/2012 8:37:49 AM PDT by Iron Eagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Iron Eagle

I have read parts of this bill and the government does want access to your banking accounts!


4 posted on 07/18/2012 8:39:52 AM PDT by elephant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: thesaleboat
Page 241 and 253: Doctors will all be paid the same regardless of specialty, and the government will set all doctors' fees.

In a free society,no doctor with any self esteem would accept such a vile violation of rights and enslavement, unless he has no choice.

5 posted on 07/18/2012 8:41:01 AM PDT by mjp ((pro-{God, reality, reason, egoism, individualism, natural rights, limited government, capitalism}))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Iron Eagle

Snopes is always quick to put a favorable liberal spin on most issues. In most valid debates I have read, the language is so convoluted that almost every section of the law will be tested in court just to come up with a ruling about what it means.


6 posted on 07/18/2012 8:44:21 AM PDT by Baynative (A man's admiration for absolute government is proportionate to the contempt he feels for others)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: thesaleboat

My guess is that most, if not all, of the claims are accurate or close enough.
Snopes, of course, says it’s all a lie. I do not trust Snopes.

http://www.snopes.com/politics/medical/kithil.asp


7 posted on 07/18/2012 8:44:24 AM PDT by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thesaleboat

*


8 posted on 07/18/2012 8:50:04 AM PDT by PMAS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lancey Howard

While they lean liberal, they are not wacko’s there at Snopes. The majority of their stuff is spot on. In this case, I would double check with another source, but I’d bet that they have this one right, for the most part.


9 posted on 07/18/2012 8:52:16 AM PDT by Paradox (I want Obama defeated. Period.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: thesaleboat
HB 3200

That's an earlier form of the bill. ObamaCare, as passed, was H.R. 3590.

10 posted on 07/18/2012 8:59:20 AM PDT by Conscience of a Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thesaleboat
Real? All you need know is the Govt. is getting between you and your doctor. The Govt. screws up everything it touches. Projected costs for this major fuster cluck have tripled since inception. And, it's not even implemented yet. Any questions?
11 posted on 07/18/2012 9:08:34 AM PDT by PowderMonkey (WILL WORK FOR AMMO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thesaleboat
I'll bet that, as you get older, serious medical care will be hard to come by.

My aunt and I both have pacemakers. I'm almost 60 and she is
80. At some point, our pacemakers, like any other electronic device, will need to be replaced. As of now, if either of us needs a pacemaker, we get it — no fuss, no muss. However, under Obamacare, the replacement procedure will have to be approved by a bureaucrat or a panel of bureaucrats. The decision to replace the pacemaker will be made based, not on medical and health need, but rather, whether the procedure will be cost effective. My aunt may be deemed too old (she will probably die soon, so why waste money on her) and the money for a new pacemaker can be better spent elsewhere (like for some chippy's abortion). Never mind that if the old pacemaker quits, my aunt will be dead.

Me? I might be placed on a waiting list or I might be prescribed medication. Problem is, I did try medication to fix my problem and the result was a cardiac arrest. So without a new pacemaker, I will be dead too.

No wonder the new law is called Death Care

12 posted on 07/18/2012 9:23:20 AM PDT by fatnotlazy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thesaleboat

It absolutely IS real. I am sure of that. Social Security already has unfettered access to your bank accounts. They can withdraw or deposit without your permission.


13 posted on 07/18/2012 9:25:00 AM PDT by GeorgeWashingtonsGhost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: elephant
I have read parts of this bill and the government does want access to your banking accounts!

I do not understand how that could possibly be acceptable under our Constitution.

14 posted on 07/18/2012 9:31:06 AM PDT by RatRipper (Obama, YOU LIE!!! . . .again and again and again and again, ad infinitum. . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: thesaleboat

While it is convoluted, it is not secret. You can read it yourself. I get these emails forwarded to me a lot, and I disregard them. Go ahead and look for the situations (helpfully referenced); the law is a monstrosity, but these emails are a little over the top.


15 posted on 07/18/2012 9:35:09 AM PDT by Mr. Bird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thesaleboat
Obamacare was designed to fail so that Single Payer System can be implemented. Won't be long before doctors are wearing government-issued uniforms. That's where this is headed. Hitler would be proud. Hard to believe anyone could sign-on to this crap. The entire health care industry, including doctors, will be one giant government union. This keeps the votes in the 'Democrat' column. That's the ultimate goal here. As well as recruiting more members of the CIVILIAN NATIONAL SECURITY FORCE; "JUST as powerful, JUST as strong, JUST AS WELL FUNDED".
16 posted on 07/18/2012 9:37:17 AM PDT by GeorgeWashingtonsGhost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thesaleboat

“For here we have no continuing city, but we seek one to come.” Hebrews 13:14. There is no ultimate hope in man; look for the city to come, whose builder and maker is God. Thank you for your promises, Lord Jesus.


17 posted on 07/18/2012 9:46:15 AM PDT by beethovenfan (If Islam is the solution, the "problem" must be freedom.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fatnotlazy

Cost effectiveness will likely be determined by estimating the present value of the future taxes you will pay or, ir you will not be paying in, the present value of the future benefits you will receive. Compared to the cost of the specific care/procedure needed. Those with net tax payments will receive priority care over those who cannot or will not be paying any more in IMHO.


18 posted on 07/18/2012 9:48:58 AM PDT by NEMDF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: thesaleboat

Here’s the link to the PDF for the final version of 3590 http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/BILLS-111hr3590enr/pdf/BILLS-111hr3590enr.pdf

As far as Judge Kithel if you search using the search engine “dogpile” using the “&” ampersand (HR 3590 & judge kithel) you’ll find enough to support the theory he did say what’s attributed to him regarding H.R.3200. The problem is that the final bill H.R. 3590 may or may not say those same things. The final bill could have been washed of those things by hiding them somewhere else or eliminating them.

Sorry... just now saved the PDF so I’m not ready to declare one way or the other.


19 posted on 07/18/2012 12:39:25 PM PDT by overdog2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Iron Eagle

Do not believe Snopes.Very left leaning people who run that site.


20 posted on 02/08/2013 10:14:53 AM PST by Disgusted in Texas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson