Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

If not Romney, then .. who?
self ^ | April 30, 2012 | knarf

Posted on 04/30/2012 3:44:52 PM PDT by knarf

..and do we have the numbers and the clout to pull it off?


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: republicancandidate; vanity
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 361-380381-400401-420421-423 next last
To: Antoninus

...”Those who vote ‘based on fear’ are no different from medieval serfs who put themselves under the protection of the strongest lord to protect them from more rapacious ones”.....Antoninus

Bump!


401 posted on 05/01/2012 11:37:09 AM PDT by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 400 | View Replies]

To: Antoninus

>>You have chosen to trust a man who has shown himself to be utterly unworthy of trust. <<

No my FRiend, you have chosen to take the record of a President who is a known Marxist and has a total disregard for the American system of Government and ignore it to prove a point.

For all the above questions, I don’t know where Romney will go. It could be as bad as Obama or not. But I know for sure that leaving Obama in office WILL guarantee all of that will, at least continue.

If I eat ice cream every night, there is a chance my teeth will rot, or maybe not. Why would I take that chance? Voting BO in is a guarantee that those who has lived under Communism see. Perhaps you should speak to a few of them. That is not fear, my FRiend. That is fact. They will vote for anyone who is not Obama if that person has a chance to win. I will listen to those who know.


402 posted on 05/01/2012 11:44:54 AM PDT by netmilsmom (I am Breitbart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 400 | View Replies]

To: Antoninus

And please try to remember this

http://www.catholic.org/national/national_story.php?id=21656


403 posted on 05/01/2012 11:57:08 AM PDT by netmilsmom (I am Breitbart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 400 | View Replies]

To: knarf; a fool in paradise; Slings and Arrows
If not Romney, then .. who?

Ya mean Pete and Roger? As limeys they're ineligible.

404 posted on 05/01/2012 11:59:43 AM PDT by Revolting cat! (Let us prey!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: netmilsmom

“...vote in such a way as to allow the least harm to innocent human life and dignity. We would not be acting immorally therefore if we were to vote for a candidate who is not totally acceptable in order to defeat one who poses an even greater threat to human life and dignity.”

You should too.
___________________________________________

Kid I was pro-life and working against abortion with my own time and money years before it was cool and acceptable as a Republican platform...

Back then only the Catholic Church was interested in saving the lives of unborn babies..

all those years I was a pioneer pro-life activist, Willard Mitt Romney was a full blown natural born pro-abortionist...

He claims he got it from his liberal Mommy..

Although he blames his mother and the death of an aunt due to an illegal abortion, I cant tell you which came first...

I do know that in 1970 THREE YEARS before Roe V Wade, while abortion was STILL ILLEGAL in this country, Lenore Romney ran for US Senate from Michigan on the Republican ticket with a pro-abortion platform...

It appears nobody in her husbands cabal objected...

Willie Mitty says he is very proud of his mother and her pro-abortion politics..

Willie himself ran for US Senate in MASS in 1994 promising that he was more pro-abortion than Ted Kennedy and that he would not try to overturn Roe V Wade

In 2002 he again ran as a pro-abortion candidate for Gov of MASS promising once again to support the state laws and Roe V Wade on abortion...

This time also he promised that if a girl couldnt get her parents permission for an abortion she could go to a judge...

and you expect me to actually VOTE and ENDORSE that evil which I have spent a lifetime fighting against ???

and you call yourself PRO-LIFE ???

R U NUTS ??????????????


405 posted on 05/01/2012 12:33:20 PM PDT by Tennessee Nana (Why should I vote for Bishop Romney when he hates me because I am a Christian)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 373 | View Replies]

To: Tennessee Nana

>>Kid <<

Stopped right there. I haven’t been a kid in over fifty years.

The Mormons may take your cuteness, freak out and try to reason with you. I don’t. I learned a long time ago that those who belittle others, care little about anyone’s opinion but their own. Why waste the neurons on it.

You’re more than welcome to babble on. Bless your heart.


406 posted on 05/01/2012 12:47:27 PM PDT by netmilsmom (I am Breitbart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 405 | View Replies]

To: netmilsmom

Obviously youre from the South...

But I cant be insulted into voting for a murderous piece of trash...

You can lower your standards all yer want...

But not me...

I’m answerable to God for my decisions...

He is the only one I have to please...

It wasnt you that hung on that Cross and shed Blood to save me...

So you just go ahead and vote for whomever you can justify in your heart is right for your conscience...

Just remember theres no room for the LORD Jesus Christ and the acceptance of evil in the same heart..


407 posted on 05/01/2012 1:00:24 PM PDT by Tennessee Nana (Why should I vote for Bishop Romney when he hates me because I am a Christian)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 406 | View Replies]

To: netmilsmom
For all the above questions, I don’t know where Romney will go. It could be as bad as Obama or not. But I know for sure that leaving Obama in office WILL guarantee all of that will, at least continue.

You are wrong in this sense--with Obama, there will at least be opposition from the right.

With Romney, the opposition will only push him further to the left.

I'm amazed that more people don't get this concept. The worst outcome of this election would be Obama and a Democrat Congress. The next worst would be Romney and a Republican or Democrat Congress. Why? Because what he does to advance socialism and betray conservatives will lead to catastrophic defeats for Republicans in 2014/2016.

Strategically speaking from the long-term perspective, the best we can hope for in 2012 is a weak Obama and a solid Republican House and Senate. That would equal gridlock. And the way to achieve that is for Romney to lose due to a conservative third-party candidate.
408 posted on 05/01/2012 1:10:53 PM PDT by Antoninus (Sorry, gone rogue.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 402 | View Replies]

To: netmilsmom
And please try to remember this

I do remember it. Romney is the greater danger, frankly, for the reasons I outlined above.
409 posted on 05/01/2012 1:12:39 PM PDT by Antoninus (Sorry, gone rogue.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 403 | View Replies]

To: Antoninus

>>The next worst would be Romney and a Republican or Democrat Congress. Why? Because what he does to advance socialism and betray conservatives will lead to catastrophic defeats for Republicans in 2014/2016.<<

Let me pray on that. This does make some sense. God will lead me to the right conclusion.

Thank you.


410 posted on 05/01/2012 2:07:42 PM PDT by netmilsmom (I am Breitbart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 408 | View Replies]

To: netmilsmom
Let me pray on that. This does make some sense. God will lead me to the right conclusion.

Do that, please. I've prayed about this quite a bit. The GOP has crossed my line in the sand this election cycle and it's been very difficult to see any kind of positive outcome. But I trust in God to confound His enemies and give the ultimate victory to His people.
411 posted on 05/01/2012 2:31:13 PM PDT by Antoninus (Sorry, gone rogue.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 410 | View Replies]

To: netmilsmom

Oh please, Four more years of Obama will get us nothing. More kids will be indoctrinated, more SCOTUS picks for life will be appointed.

This will not lead to a GOP 2016. It will lead to another Marxist voted in by landslides.

Have you seen anyone oppose Obama yet that has had teeth? In 5 years, people who pay no attention now and are only 13 years old will be voting. And after 5 more years of union run schools, who do you think they will vote for?

Remember, Obama will hold the veto pen and rule by EO.


412 posted on 05/01/2012 2:40:34 PM PDT by dforest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 410 | View Replies]

To: dforest

Those aren’t my words, I just said that I would pray about it.


413 posted on 05/01/2012 2:56:35 PM PDT by netmilsmom (I am Breitbart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 412 | View Replies]

To: netmilsmom

Like I said, if that’s how you rationalize your vote, that’s your call. Every person has their limit....Romney is mine. In my book, you own it.

By the way if you really believe that Obama or anyone is capable of implementing Sharia law within the next 4 years, you might want to stock up on tin foil.

Those are Romney talking points designed to scare you into acquiescing towards his brand of “severe conservatism”/socialism.


414 posted on 05/01/2012 3:27:45 PM PDT by vmivol00 (I won't be reconstructed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 373 | View Replies]

To: vmivol00

>>Those are Romney talking points designed to scare you into acquiescing towards his brand of “severe conservatism”/socialism.<<

I haven’t paid a bit of attention to Romney.
I supported Newt and Santorum. They both dropped out.

And what makes you think that BO is the only person who can serve and install Sharia? Four more of BO, a couple of lib Justices and our law is moot.

Just keep bleating...


415 posted on 05/01/2012 3:40:25 PM PDT by netmilsmom (I am Breitbart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 414 | View Replies]

To: netmilsmom

Uh huh. Ok. Thanks for stopping by to spread the Romney talking points. Good luck with GOP endorsed socialism.


416 posted on 05/01/2012 4:39:57 PM PDT by vmivol00 (I won't be reconstructed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 415 | View Replies]

To: vmivol00; netmilsmom
Uh huh. Ok. Thanks for stopping by to spread the Romney talking points. Good luck with GOP endorsed socialism.

Uh huh. Ok. Thanks for your work toward reelecting Barry Obama. Good luck with conservatoid knotted knickers.
417 posted on 05/01/2012 4:45:24 PM PDT by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 416 | View Replies]

To: vmivol00

I think you’re mistaking me for someone who actually cares if you disregard the truth I tell you about myself.

No skin off my nose, I don’t know you, nor is this conversation getting anywhere.

See ya Comrade.


418 posted on 05/01/2012 5:20:55 PM PDT by netmilsmom (I am Breitbart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 416 | View Replies]

To: aruanan

>>Good luck with conservatoid knotted knickers. <<

LOL! Got that right.


419 posted on 05/01/2012 5:22:08 PM PDT by netmilsmom (I am Breitbart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 417 | View Replies]

To: aruanan

...and thank you for helping to support the destruction of conservatism in the GOP by supporting a “severe conservative”/socialist. He will do wonders for the party when he is able to stack all the RNC leadership positions with his gun grabbing, pro Planned Parenthood, liberal socialist buddies. “Severe Conservatism” will flourish, while true conservatives will be eliminated. I’m pretty sure his first action will be to try to spank conservatives for not supporting his candidacy.

Liberals figured out some time ago that a portion of the GOP sheep will vehemently support anything with an R behind it. (Even someone who outflanked a Kennedy to the left and adamantly disassociated himself with Reagan, one of the greatest conservatives the country has known). Romney proves that point.

Honestly if you want to support Romney, that’s fine. If You line up eith his views, fine. I cant support that. I think he is a sleazy empty suit willing to say or do anything to get elected. He honestly reminds me of a slightly cleaner version of John Edwards.

I’m tired of the Romneybots telling conservatives that they are closet Obama supporters because they don’t drink the Romney Kool Aide. Not sure if that’s what you pushing as well or not.


420 posted on 05/01/2012 6:32:42 PM PDT by vmivol00 (I won't be reconstructed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 417 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 361-380381-400401-420421-423 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson