Go, Ah say go away, boy, you bother me!
Posted on 02/19/2012 3:57:01 AM PST by Chance Hart
First off, I am a conservative and have spent countless hours listening to and reading the books of all these men. Reading Levin's Liberty and Tyranny was compelling, as were many of the publications of these Patriots. With the VAST amount of Constitutional research accumulated in order to write these best sellers, there is and has always has been one important fact known to ALL these men to be a Constitutional FACT missing. That non negotiable FACT is that according to the Constitution, Barack Hussein Obama is NOT eligible to be placed on the ballot, let alone occupy his present position as President of the United States of America! Obama himself touts the fact that his father was a British Subject at the time of his “BHO 2’s” birth, making him at the very least a duel citizen and not eligible to hold the office as president. Furthermore, Daddy was NEVER a citizen of the United States, again making Jr. ineligible with that fact alone. None of these men (as far as I know) served in the military for whatever reason and I think there may be some suppressed guilt because of that when I hear their accolades regarding current and former Men of Honor. As they refer to many of their callers and guests as “Brother”, they at the same time have never felt compelled to commit the heroic act of jumping on a Firecracker, let alone a Grenade to help save their “Brothers” and in the end help save this Nation. Levin is the one that has disappointed me the most when I heard him disenfranchise many of his loyal listeners on Jan 19th, 2010 (may have been the 20th) by referring to those that even questioned the eligibility issue as (paraphrasing) ignorant and foolish. He followed that comment by saying that Obama was of course eligible to be President. He, in my opinion is an expert on the Constitution and knows full well that his statement was an out and out lie. When the truth finally reveals itself, I can almost hear the excuses from these Less than Honorable radio and TV Patriots now – 1. I was given strict orders from station bosses not to bring up or allow discussion on the eligibility issue and to refer to those that do bring it up as ignorant Birthers. 2. Yes, I of course knew the simple truth, but decided it was the wrong approach to be honest when the proper way to handle this was at the Ballot Box. 3. Book sales were BOOMING and I was too GUTLESS to show the Courage that I ask my listeners to display on a daily basis. 4. There are a few in the business that are standing their ground on this issue and Liberals are calling them names. Sticks and Stones will break my Bones and even Words would really hurt me because I AM A COWARD! By the way, there are thousands of these Cowards walking the halls of Congress and other places that have at least to this point failed to MAN UP. All this makes me admire all the more the few that in their heart really do trust God Almighty and FEAR NO EVIL.
Learn HTML or don’t post.
This may help...
@Key Dates and Landmarks in United States Immigration History
So now explain how this is relevant to the Obama eligibility issue. We know the law had changed before he was born.
There is no evidence at all that his mother lost her citizenship even though it is very clear to the government was very aware she had married two foreign nationals and had left America to live.with one.
I’ve enjoyed the history lesson though - it was an interesting diversion.
Who said all states said the same. My only point is referencing clause 4 vice 5 resides in the legal code of at least two states and therefore it did not indicate shoddy scholarship on the part of the Ankeny judge.
How about addressing this...
Two examples is hardly evidence that all States have the same thing. And you have shown nothing as to why there is even such a discrepancy besides conjecture.
Show me the why and where and then you'll have a leg to stand on.
Here is our law in Texas... @ELECTION CODE TITLE 11. PRESIDENTIAL ELECTIONS
SUBCHAPTER B. PRESIDENTIAL AND VICE-PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATES
Sec. 192.031. PARTY CANDIDATE'S ENTITLEMENT TO PLACE ON BALLOT.
(a) A political party is entitled to have the names of its nominees for president and vice-president of the United States placed on the ballot in a presidential general election if:
No "renumbering" required.
Where, and how, does Indiana have, or get, the authority to "renumber" a clause of the Constitution?
The Indiana Code refers to the amended Constitution. A clause was removed from that section.
@The following text is a transcription of the Constitution in its original form.
Items that are hyperlinked have since been amended or superseded. (emphasis in the original)
Note: A portion of Article II, section 1 of the Constitution was superseded by the 12th amendment.
*Superseded by section 3 of the 20th amendment.
So the rest of Clause 3, that which wasn't superseded, still applies and the clause numbers are still the same.
Remind me.again why this is important. That’s right - it’s not.
The Indiana code says what it says. NH says the same. I am sure there are more if I cared to look further. But I don’t.
It doesn’t help your cause in the slightest.
A clause was removed from that section.
Some might even call your statement an outright lie!
You aren't even man enough to admit that you were wrong.
Oh that’s right - this completely undermines Ankeny and paves the way for frogmarching Obama to prison. Does that sum it up?
Every Republican candidate in NH certified he was a NBC in accordance with Clause 4 - they have been doing it for how many decades now? Do you think that is a legally binding certification?
You can always stop replying to me. Just stop typing if you don’t want any more replies from me. Takes a little self disipline but it works.
Learn HTML or don’t post.
Yeah BM - I will get right on that while your MOMMY fixes your Mac and Cheese dinner! Don’t forget to Boot-Up before you break out that new bar of Ivory Smooooooooooth.
Oh please. It's been so beat to death here on FR that most of the people trying to correct birther silliness have grown tired of it.
The Indiana code says what it says. NH says the same.
Indiana gave us Ankeny. New Hampshire allowed Obama on the ballot.
What are the odds of that?
Must be a deep cover conspiracy going back at least a hundred years. I would start looking at his great-great-great grandparents. This is deeper then you have ever imagined!!!
BTW - didn’t every state let Obama on their ballot?
Do you think those NH declarations were legally binding?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.