[philman_36]

So now explain how this is relevant to the Obama eligibility issue.
Why? You don't believe a thing anybody says if it's counter to what you believe so why bother trying. Despite your assertion you are not here to "learn" anything.
All I'm doing is giving context to your snippet as your snippet doesn't convey the whole intent intended.

How about addressing this...
Two examples is hardly evidence that all States have the same thing. And you have shown nothing as to why there is even such a discrepancy besides conjecture.
Show me the why and where and then you'll have a leg to stand on.

Here is our law in Texas... @ELECTION CODE TITLE 11. PRESIDENTIAL ELECTIONS
SUBCHAPTER B. PRESIDENTIAL AND VICE-PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATES
Sec. 192.031. PARTY CANDIDATE'S ENTITLEMENT TO PLACE ON BALLOT.
(a) A political party is entitled to have the names of its nominees for president and vice-president of the United States placed on the ballot in a presidential general election if:

(1) the nominees possess the qualifications for those offices prescribed by federal law;

No "renumbering" required.

[Harlan1196]

Remind me.again why this is important. That’s right - it’s not.

The Indiana code says what it says. NH says the same. I am sure there are more if I cared to look further. But I don’t.

It doesn’t help your cause in the slightest.