Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 02/09/2012 4:16:00 PM PST by cakid1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last
To: cakid1

I went to an all male Catholic school in New Orleans, my wife went to a girls school. In fact the public schools had a few separate schools, with waiting lists to get in them.

I am an advocate of single sex schools, everyone concentrates on school instead of appearances or whose dating who.


2 posted on 02/09/2012 4:19:44 PM PST by USAFJeeper (Who Dat Nation - Loving the Manning Face!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: cakid1

the boarding school i went to was like that...

and people who know me might observe “well, there’s your problem...” :)

seriously, what the public schools are doing now is not working, so it’s worth a try.


3 posted on 02/09/2012 4:20:45 PM PST by Reverend Wright (you voted for Obama to prove you're not racist, now vote against him to prove you're not stupid...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: cakid1

It was a good idea before the Supreme Court legalize sodomy.

It’s not a safe idea now.


5 posted on 02/09/2012 4:21:09 PM PST by donna (I want to live in a Judeo/Christian country where we know that, before God, men & women are equal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: cakid1

Home school is the best idea.


7 posted on 02/09/2012 4:24:04 PM PST by Retired Greyhound (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: cakid1

I reckon their aim is socialization. For the most part, that happens in the home. They’ll be educated but no less savage.


8 posted on 02/09/2012 4:24:12 PM PST by old school
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: cakid1

I reckon their aim is socialization. For the most part, that happens in the home. They’ll be educated but no less savage.


9 posted on 02/09/2012 4:24:20 PM PST by old school
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: cakid1

It’s a great idea. It’s well known that males and females learn differently. By making schools single sex, the schools can customize the respective educational needs of the students.


10 posted on 02/09/2012 4:24:55 PM PST by Jonty30 (What Islam and secularism have in common is that they are both death cults.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: cakid1

Since the moral equivalency of a homosexual relationship is now being taught as early as six years of age, maybe this would be an excellent experiment in its application.

Tensions are still going to be pretty high. And the average intellectual level will still not change very much.

Boys need almost one-on-one, or at most, very small groups, to be fully focused on obtaining a truly lifetime education.

Now girls, on the other hand, do really well in single-gender classrooms, even with relatively large class sizes.


11 posted on 02/09/2012 4:26:12 PM PST by alloysteel (Are Democrats truly "better angels"? They are lousy stewards for America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: cakid1

If you hate boys, boyishness, and maleness in general...if you’ve spent decades drugging boys, emasculating them with psy-ops, and otherwise forcing them to behave like “good little girls”...then no, this is definitely not a good idea.

Expect the NEA to oppose it tooth and nail.


12 posted on 02/09/2012 4:26:21 PM PST by LearsFool ("Thou shouldst not have been old, till thou hadst been wise.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: cakid1

If you get total isolation you get the Afghanistan worldview. You can integrate the sexes-—like for hundreds of years when the US had excellent schools-—one room. You need discipline, dress codes, and teachers of moral excellence and intelligence.

You need accountability and strictness and the ability to kick kids out of school. Going to school should be voluntary and the culture should glorify education and people who are of high intellect. All local control of schools.

And you need to teach morality and Ethics (judeo-Christian Ethics)-—what Aristotle and all intellectuals knew (until Marx) was the real purpose of education.

Central control of schools NEVER works-—no matter what you do.


15 posted on 02/09/2012 4:28:41 PM PST by savagesusie (Right Reason According to Nature = Just Law)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: cakid1

Good for some, bad for others. Life’s a bitch and then you die. Art Linkletter had it right, people ARE funny. (That’s almost a Haiku)


18 posted on 02/09/2012 4:37:47 PM PST by gorush (History repeats itself because human nature is static)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: cakid1

Because if boys aren’t interested in reading books for girls, and if math consists of cut-and-paste glitter projects * they won’t be interested in reading or math.

* here’s one for history
http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_ilbHq1j1YsE/SvnwGuXgOvI/AAAAAAAAB3o/3aLYSdyVAlo/s1600/IB+World+History+test.jpg


19 posted on 02/09/2012 4:48:11 PM PST by ari-freedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: cakid1

My son went to an all boys high school, my daughter went to an all girls high school, and I taught in a co-ed public school. The single sex schools were by far superior because most of the problems in school today revolve around tensions and issues involving the opposite sex. There was none of that in my kids’ schools. The only thing they could do was focus on academics (and sports).


22 posted on 02/09/2012 4:54:36 PM PST by FrdmLvr (culture, language, borders)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: cakid1
I teach in an all-boys school in Australia. Single sex education is pretty common here and it's accepted by virtually everybody that it produces far better outcomes in terms of discipline and academic results. Slightly more controversial, but generally accepted, is the idea that children educated in single sex environments leave school with better social skills, and a more positive and equitable view of the opposite sex. And contrary to popular belief, it's also better for kids who don't fit their traditional gender stereotype - a boy who is interested in, say, clothing design, or a girl who is interested in mechanical repair - in a single sex school, they are simply seen as "the boy who's into fashion" rather than "the boy who acts like a girl" or as the "girl who's good with engines" rather than "the girl who acts like a boy" - they are more likely to be accepted for who they are - ('one of the guys/girls, everybody has their quirks) without having their overall gender identity questioned.

Really, it should be a no-brainer. There's no reason to break up coeducational schools that are doing a good job (why fix something that isn't broken) but where you have a problem with significant numbers of schools that aren't doing a good job, this is worth looking at as part of the solution.

25 posted on 02/09/2012 4:59:20 PM PST by naturalman1975 ("America was under attack. Australia was immediately there to help." - John Winston Howard)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: cakid1

YES!! Our sons went to an all male high school. They actually paid attention and LEARNED, without the distraction of trying to look cool for the girls, or act bad-a$$ for their benefit.


28 posted on 02/09/2012 5:01:56 PM PST by SuziQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: cakid1

I wish our boys had the option....


30 posted on 02/09/2012 5:07:00 PM PST by browniexyz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: cakid1

Is it a good idea?

In a word - Yes.

Immature humans to whom their care is the responsibility of their parents and othe adults need structure and focus in their lives more than they do their Liberty.

Mixed gender schools provide the opportunity for distractions from the education purpose of school.

The loss of whatever liberties are minimized by single-gender schools are more than made-up by the benefits of greater focus on the academic side of school life there.

By the way, I’m in favor of school uniforms as well; which limit another area of distraction, social competition and immature social mean-spiritness over how well some student is or is not dressed.


32 posted on 02/09/2012 5:19:31 PM PST by Wuli (ui)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: cakid1

If parents want to send their kids to single sex schools that is their right. There are certainly advantages to it.


36 posted on 02/09/2012 5:29:30 PM PST by Harmless Teddy Bear (Would you sing if someone sucked YOU up the vacuum cleaner hose?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: cakid1

Good Idea? First of all it is a very OLD idea and in my opinion a very good one. I went to an all boys high school taught by Marist Brothers and I thank God that I was able to attend that school and not the public school. Not only did you get a good education but it built character in a rowdy bunch of boys who left a lot smarter and much more civilized.


38 posted on 02/09/2012 5:58:55 PM PST by mc5cents
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: cakid1

yes, it is a great idea!


40 posted on 02/09/2012 6:08:15 PM PST by television is just wrong
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson