Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Staring at naked women makes you smarter: Study
Canoe.ca ^ | November 24, 2011 | Mike Strobel, QMI Agency

Posted on 11/25/2011 11:23:36 PM PST by Slings and Arrows

-snip-

Researchers at the University of Tampere and Aalto University showed volunteer men and women photos of models in varying stages of undress.

Before all you women in sensible shoes cry “sexist pig!”, I hasten to add the models also were male and female.

The volunteers’ electrical brain activity was monitored.

Results appear in the current edition of the science journal PLoS One.

They make me proud to work for this newspaper, to share space with such brain food as the SUNshine Girl.

Professor Jari Hietanen reports the less clothes the models wore, the quicker each volunteer’s grey matter kicked into action.

This may have roots in how our cave-man ancestor identified a potential mate. It was easier if they were naked.

“In less than 0.2 seconds, the brain processes pictures of nude bodies more efficiently than clothed bodies,” Professor Hietanen says.

“Responses were the strongest when the participants looked at (nudes), the second strongest to bodies in swimsuits, and the weakest to fully clothed bodies.”

-snip-

(Excerpt) Read more at cnews.canoe.ca ...


TOPICS: Education; Health/Medicine; Science
KEYWORDS: nakedwomen; napl
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-73 next last
To: Lancey Howard

Hahaha ...


21 posted on 11/26/2011 1:25:55 AM PST by BunnySlippers (I LOVE BULL MARKETS . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Slings and Arrows

Belly laugh......GG


22 posted on 11/26/2011 1:52:53 AM PST by goat granny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Slings and Arrows
I'm a 68 years old DOM and have been spying nekkid women form many moons (only older guys will appreciate this) when as a young-un' we had to rely of National Geographic Magazine which occasionally published pic of African Women who went bare from the waist up.

Don't know if that has made me smarter, but it has made life more interesting and enjoyable, for just like the saying that we carnivores say to PETA that if God didn't want us to eat meat, He would not have made it so "tasty;" if God didn't want us to ogle the anatomy of beautiful women "au natural" why did he make the female anatomy so alluring and fascinating?

However, it goes without saying that there are some women (dare I suggest, Liberal females? lol) who should NEVER be seen clothed, never mind undressed, as some of us have weak stomachs.

Of course the previous declaration does not apply for males on the make, in bars, after about 8 to 10 drinks and it's 10 minutes before closing time; then that rule is null and void and they all (even the woof-woofs) look absolutely spectacular and desirable. lol

23 posted on 11/26/2011 2:01:26 AM PST by Conservative Vermont Vet (l)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Slings and Arrows
Apropos to resurrect this oldy but goody:

beer

24 posted on 11/26/2011 2:07:29 AM PST by Conservative Vermont Vet (l)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Slings and Arrows

So brain activity mimicking caveman instincts is now…. smarter?

OK, apparently the study concludes that, because of some measurable increase in the speed of brain activity, people seem smarter than they really are. Reading the article makes one dumber. Posting about it makes one an idiot.

Did I get that right? I’ve lost too many brain cells now to tell.


25 posted on 11/26/2011 2:28:34 AM PST by drierice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Slings and Arrows

Lord, I must have the smartest husband in the world. He can hear my shower running from six blocks away!


26 posted on 11/26/2011 2:51:17 AM PST by poobear (Facts, the TURD in the punchbowl of Liberal thought!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lancey Howard

In AFTER the Helen Thomas pick, dammit.


27 posted on 11/26/2011 2:56:41 AM PST by BenKenobi (Honkeys for Herman! 10 percent is enough for God; 9 percent is enough for government)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Lancey Howard

Brain Drain.


28 posted on 11/26/2011 3:03:18 AM PST by Cvengr (Adversity in life and death is inevitable. Thru faith in Christ, stress is optional.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Slings and Arrows

29 posted on 11/26/2011 3:25:45 AM PST by Berlin_Freeper (For years the Left protested "the occupation of Iraq"- now they want to "Occupy" all across the US)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Slings and Arrows

Would be a much better story if it were backed up with an extensive photo spread.


30 posted on 11/26/2011 3:32:45 AM PST by Joe Boucher ((FUBO) obammy is just a quota boy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Slings and Arrows
Staring at naked women.... Brilliant!
31 posted on 11/26/2011 3:47:11 AM PST by Shqipo (I am AttackWatch parolee #1,237. I am breaking my parole once more.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Joe Boucher

Go to the picture gallery, Joe. Then scroll down.


32 posted on 11/26/2011 3:56:38 AM PST by Scotsman will be Free (11C - Indirect fire, infantry - High angle hell - We will bring you, FIRE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Slings and Arrows

LAZAMATAZ

33 posted on 11/26/2011 4:00:04 AM PST by Lazamataz (For the balance of the day, I will reply to a thread on another thread.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: alexander_busek
Accurate experimental findings, faulty logic, and wrong conclusion (or at least: misleading article).

Another great theory ruined with logic and facts. What do you plan on shooting down next, Santa Claus, the Easter Bunny, the Tooth Fairy, or Obamacare?

34 posted on 11/26/2011 4:02:08 AM PST by verga (I am not an apologist, I just play one on television.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Slings and Arrows

What kind of results would I get if I tried it with projected holograms? Sign me up!


35 posted on 11/26/2011 4:23:38 AM PST by equaviator ( "There's a (datum) plane on the horizon coming in...see it?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Slings and Arrows
I find this hard to believe. I'll have to test this theory.
36 posted on 11/26/2011 4:31:07 AM PST by Major Matt Mason (The Chicago Way isn't the American Way.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: paudio

“How does the author comes into a conclusion that faster reaction on certain stimuli makes us smarter?”

Yeah, seems he spent too much time staring at numbers.

Seriously though, seems a “duh” that the brain processes the natural unconcealed figure than when adorned with a proliferation of random concealments.


37 posted on 11/26/2011 4:34:34 AM PST by ctdonath2 ($1 meals: http://abuckaplate.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Slings and Arrows
TTIUWOP

Just sayin'...

38 posted on 11/26/2011 4:34:53 AM PST by AF_Blue ("America is all about speed. Hot, nasty, bad ass speed." - Eleanor Roosevelt, 1936)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: One Name

“Well ya see Norm, it’s like this... A herd of buffalo can only move as fast as the slowest buffalo. And when the herd is hunted, it is the slowest and weakest ones at the back that are killed first. This natural selection is good for the herd as a whole, because the general speed and health of the whole group keeps improving by the regular killing of the weakest members.

“In much the same way, the human brain can only operate as fast as the slowest brain cells. Excessive intake of alcohol, as we all know, kills brain cells, but naturally it attacks the slowest and weakest brain cells first. In this way, regular consumption of beer elimates the weaker brain cells, making the brain a faster and more efficient machine. That’s why you always feel smarter after a few beers.”


39 posted on 11/26/2011 4:40:39 AM PST by savedbygrace (But God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: paudio
How does the author comes into a conclusion that faster reaction on certain stimuli makes us smarter?

Astute question - probably being pushed to increase accessibility of porn to the kids so they can be smarter too.

It's like saying that showing the whole face of a family member, vs. showing a shot from the lips to the eyebrows, makes you smarter because you recognize the person faster.

40 posted on 11/26/2011 4:46:32 AM PST by trebb ("If a man will not work, he should not eat" From 2 Thes 3)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-73 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson