Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Treadmill shows medieval armour influenced battles
BBC News ^ | July 19, 2011 | Rebecca Morelle

Posted on 08/27/2011 6:37:40 AM PDT by SunkenCiv

Medieval suits of armour were so exhausting to wear that they could have affected the outcomes of famous battles, a study suggests.

Scientists monitored volunteers fitted with 15th Century replica armour as they walked and ran on treadmills.

They found that the subjects used high levels of energy, bore immense weight on their legs and suffered from restricted breathing.

The research is published in the Proceedings of the Royal Society B.

The effect of the heavy armour was so great, that the researchers believe it may have have had an impact on the Battle of Agincourt.

"It is a huge fraction of the wearer's body weight" -- Dr Graham Askew University of Leeds

In this famous Anglo-French conflict of 1415, French knights were defeated by their English counterparts, despite the fact that they heavily outnumbered them.

The researchers say their study suggests that the armour-clad French, who had to trek through a muddy field to meet the stationary English line, were so slowed and exhausted by their march that they would have stood little chance.

(Excerpt) Read more at bbc.co.uk ...


TOPICS: History; Science; Travel
KEYWORDS: agincourt; battleofagincourt; charlesthemad; england; france; godsgravesglyphs; henryv; hundredyearswar; longbow; longbowmen; middleages; renaissance; revisionism
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081 next last
To: SunkenCiv
They could have just asked this guy...

8:42 mile.

21 posted on 08/27/2011 7:05:42 AM PDT by Tijeras_Slim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv
If you put Joe Blow from Peoria into full desert battle gear and dropped him into Anbar, he'd fall to pieces in short order too.

Just like US Rangers train extensively in full gear and extreme weather to prepare for battle, medieval knights trained from the age of 12 on in the art of warfare, including repeated drills and contests in full armor.

Putting randomly selected people from the street, putting them in armor for the first time in their lives and then putting them on a treadmill isn't very meaningful.

22 posted on 08/27/2011 7:14:33 AM PDT by wideawake
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv
Let's look at some REAL Gubmint-Funded Science:



23 posted on 08/27/2011 7:17:46 AM PDT by SERKIT ("Blazing Saddles" explains it all......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv
I've been reading about the history of Plymouth Plantation. During King Phillip's War the puritans were armed as their brethren in England were - breastplates, muskets and 14' pikes. After a couple of disastrous months of trying to chase the Indians into the swamps they figured out that a flintlock and sword is much better.
24 posted on 08/27/2011 7:20:51 AM PDT by Pan_Yan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Citizen Tom Paine

They might as well have said that the swords are real heavy too and that would have slowed them down as well as the heavy armor. But like you said, the people wearing them trained in them, so the armor wouldn’t have been as much of a problem for them as four volunteers who never wore armor in their lives before the experiment.


25 posted on 08/27/2011 7:34:12 AM PDT by driftless2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: wideawake

It’s meaningful since they are looking at the CHANGE in energy consumption going from unarmored to armored, not the absolute value.

If you double the energy consumption walking you can make valid inferences about what additional energy was consumed by putting armor on a man on horseback.

Question for historians: What fraction of actual battle time did knights spend on their horse and how much knocked off and fighting on the ground?


26 posted on 08/27/2011 7:52:40 AM PDT by DManA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: glorgau

I carried 65 to 90 pounds in Vietnam (No, I did not see John Kerry while there), the lighter load while patrolling in the mountains. Walking is OK, but if you have to run with it, it’s a kicker! Especially through rice paddies!

Later in training in the mountains in Korean my team had packs weighing 105 to 115 lbs. I would not want to carry much more AND fight. Of course, we always dropped the bulk of the load before an assault.

I was 5’ 8” and 155 lbs at the time.


27 posted on 08/27/2011 7:53:07 AM PDT by BwanaNdege (“Man has often lost his way, but modern man has lost his address” - Gilbert K. Chesterton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: driftless2

If your arm is twice as heavy for being encased in metal then you can slash your sword half as often regardless of how fit you are.


28 posted on 08/27/2011 7:56:33 AM PDT by DManA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

Why bother doing the study? All one needs do is read the battle accounts written at the time. They all say the same thing, no matter which battle. Extended fighting in armor is exhausting. Doh!


29 posted on 08/27/2011 8:01:14 AM PDT by jimtorr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

30 posted on 08/27/2011 8:03:37 AM PDT by martin_fierro (< |:)~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv
These threads are fascinating!

The charge was led by Captain Obvious.

Albeit messy, but the coffee should come right off my monitor... ; )

31 posted on 08/27/2011 8:04:37 AM PDT by Caipirabob ( Communists... Socialists... Democrats...Traitors... Who can tell the difference?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Roccus
Medieval suits of armour as depicted were expensive. I doubt that commoners and serfs were able to afford them. Rather, the aristocracy and mercenaries would employ them and I would think on horseback, not on foot.

Think of it as "medieval stimulus". There were frequent reported incidents where peasants would strip the dead for their armor after a battle. I've read of stories where they'd kill a armored soldier if they had a chance just for the value of their gear if they could get away with it.

Gotta love these threads. There's so many tidbits to take away from them.

32 posted on 08/27/2011 8:11:25 AM PDT by Caipirabob ( Communists... Socialists... Democrats...Traitors... Who can tell the difference?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

I once read that the Roman foot-soldier trained in heavy armor but fought in light armor.


33 posted on 08/27/2011 8:19:56 AM PDT by Hiddigeigei ("Talk sense to a fool and he calls you foolish," said Dionysus - Euripides)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Citizen Tom Paine
“I would submit as a working hypothesis that a medeival knight was in much better physical shape that the average volunteer selected today.”

We have a tendency today to downgrade the men of those times as ‘smaller and weaker’ than we are. However when a few actual english Long Bows were pulled up from some water that had preserved them perfectly it was found that the “pull” on them was a lot higher than formerly theorized. The truth is that when a mans life depended upon his mastering a thing HE MASTERED THE HELL OUT OF IT!

34 posted on 08/27/2011 8:25:07 AM PDT by TalBlack ( Evil doesn't have a day job.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Caipirabob

;’)


35 posted on 08/27/2011 8:29:58 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (It's never a bad time to FReep this link -- https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Hiddigeigei

Roman legionnairies relied (like their hoplite predecessors in Greece and Macedonia, among other groups) on fairly heavy shields, a decent helmet, and of course, the formation. Those on the outside would fight, then their officers would blow a loud whistle (not makin’ this up) and the soldiers behind would move up. Those retiring would head to the back of the line to rest and wait their next “shift”. These cycles of combat were measured in minutes, and help account for both the effectiveness of the Roman army and for its fairly small size, given the length of the frontiers and extent of the territory.


36 posted on 08/27/2011 8:35:11 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (It's never a bad time to FReep this link -- https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: zot

body armour ping


37 posted on 08/27/2011 8:35:33 AM PDT by GreyFriar (Spearhead - 3rd Armored Division 75-78 & 83-87)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: martin_fierro

Always a good idea.


38 posted on 08/27/2011 8:35:36 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (It's never a bad time to FReep this link -- https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: BwanaNdege

> I was 5’ 8” and 155 lbs at the time.

So, how tall are you now? /rimshot

:’)

Thanks, that’s an excellent anecdote, because the wet terrain in Vietnam is analogous to the field conditions at Agincourt (freshly ploughed ground, rained for days before).


39 posted on 08/27/2011 8:37:45 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (It's never a bad time to FReep this link -- https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Pan_Yan

Thanks Pan_Yan.


40 posted on 08/27/2011 8:37:59 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (It's never a bad time to FReep this link -- https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson