You are dead right. The image has been doctored with a digitally-added number. Who's B/C was it copied from? Someone in the range 10642 to 10649?
Posted on 04/27/2011 10:24:09 AM PDT by piytar
If you import the original le from the White House in to Illustrator you will see the image is a clipping mask, meaning they were merged together. The next three pages show the individual pieces. If this were just a scan then why would it be able to be taken apart liket his? Why does the type-writer font look so digitized? Look at the di erence between the two signatures. One looks like it was written on the computer while the other looks like it was actually signed by hand on the document.
(Excerpt) Read more at docs.google.com ...
All the items showing pixilation existed in the original “layer”.
Both of the ‘K’s in Kansas and Kenya as well as the ‘M’ in box 5b.
You answered your own question.....
It is a tar baby.
You are dead right. The image has been doctored with a digitally-added number. Who's B/C was it copied from? Someone in the range 10642 to 10649?
Like I said elsewhere, it is as fraudulent as he is. Common sense tells you that. Of course, this “settles it” as far as CNN goes.
Lets assume for a second that the document is genuine - (it has provenance, and as far as a scanned image it looks very much like the Nordyke image to me, with the exception of “Oahu” being listed as State in the middle-left of the Nordyke document where Obama’s says “Hawaii.”
But all these details aside - This document shows that Obama is NOT a natural born citizen based on the definition in use at the time of the writing of the Constitution. Natural born at the time meant born on US soil to TWO citizen parents.
The only catch is if the 14th amendment eliminated all grades of citizenship upon ratification, effectively removing the natural born citizen requirement of the presidency. (Which it would have had to do expressly, not through implication - I think.)
Hmmmmm
I have. Not just me, either. Working FB angles.
Would like some Freeper to check the WH doc now and see if the layers have been merged. (I don’t have Illustrator.)
I would think that all of this would've been typed at the same time.
I’ll go beyond “tired head”. Just finished Aguire’s book and I will bet folks are gonna start going to jail for questioning this document. Sort of a “golden calf”. Worship or die.
Did you notice that the local registrar’s name is spelled wrong?
Panic in the WH...to put this ridiculous fake bc for the world to see...and how easy to prove it is a fake...
Please!
This is the way typewriters worked. And think!! Kansas is where SAD was born. I don't think anyone has ever suggested that SHE was born in Kenya.
ML/NJ
look at the certificate # - on the green doc it shows to be 61 10641. Unlayer it, and look at the pixaliztion on the 1064 “1” on the green. I am just getting started and what I see already is a freaking felony alteration of gov’t documents. There is no way this doc is real or legitimate....red
Cross-checked with the Nordyke certs.
The ‘M’ is smaller because it is on the original blank form (fill in only an ‘A’ or ‘P’) Boilerplate inclusion.
A lot of you have mentioned some interesting points, but this thread is about the fact the WH PDF is a LAYERED - as in comouter assembled - document! That’s a smoking freaking gun!
I also wonder how long until the WH quietly replaces the PDF with a merged layer doc. Can someone with Illustrator check to see if that has been done?
Note that the "Registrars" differ. I'm not saying this proves anything, but it is rather surprising.
ML/NJ
“What is this supposed to be? What is with the curled page set on top of another page. That is clearly what was done. Yet all the green security paper pattern lines up? This doesn’t even make sense. “
This one point is a non-starter.
Go get a book. Fill your copier with security paper. Now, open you book and make a copy of a page by pressing the open book against the glass. The copy will come out on security paper, but the photocopied portion will have a curve along the edge.
The copied from the birth cert book onto a piece of security paper. Simple answer.
Then they certified and signed the copy, because they aren’t going to RIP the page out of their book and send it to Obama. They’d make a copy.
So you are way off base with your analysis.
Pay closer attention to the folks talking about layers in the PDF document. That part has some merit so far, but not yet sure how much merit.
the last “1” in box 20 was definitely added using MS Paint or ??
Drudge now on it. Link from his page: http://wireupdate.com/video/2011/04/president-obamas-birth-certificate-pdf-has-layers/
I’ve got a copy from the website of the layerd document - and I’m sure many others do too by now. The white hut can do what they want, but this won’t go away even if they scrub the website...red
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.