Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Archaeologists discover saber-toothed vegetarian
AP ^ | 3/24/11 | AP

Posted on 03/24/2011 2:10:25 PM PDT by illiac

In before the Helen Thomas and Mooochelle pics...

WASHINGTON (AP) — Surprised scientists have discovered the remains of a saber-toothed vegetarian. The leaf-crunching animal — about the size of a large dog — lived 260 million years ago in what is now Brazil, researchers report in Friday's edition of the journal Science. Its upper canine teeth were nearly 5 inches long.

Such large teeth are more often the mark of a meat-eating animal, used to capture and kill prey.

(Excerpt) Read more at google.com ...


TOPICS: Chit/Chat; History; Science
KEYWORDS: godsgravesglyphs; history; humor; reptiles
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-58 last
To: illiac

Maybe the long canines were used to help till the soil in preparation for planting a MichelleousObamus garden full of aragula and other tasty treats for children.


41 posted on 03/24/2011 5:27:16 PM PDT by wildbill (You're just jealous because the Voices talk only to me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: illiac

“In addition to its saber shaped fangs, the newly discovered animal named Tiarajudens eccentricus (tee-AH-ruh-HOO-denz ek-SIN-trik-us) had rows of teeth on the roof of its mouth for chewing, the researchers said. The lower jaw was incomplete, but they expect it would have had similar rows of teeth.”


42 posted on 03/24/2011 5:27:50 PM PDT by TigersEye (Who crashed the markets on 9/15/08 and why?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeronL; StayAt HomeMother; Ernest_at_the_Beach; 1010RD; 21twelve; 24Karet; 2ndDivisionVet; 31R1O; ..

· GGG managers are SunkenCiv, StayAt HomeMother, and Ernest_at_the_Beach ·
· join list or digest · view topics · view or post blog · bookmark · post a topic · subscribe ·

 
 Antiquity Journal
 & archive
 Archaeologica
 Archaeology
 Archaeology Channel
 BAR
 Bronze Age Forum
 Discover
 Dogpile
 Eurekalert
 Google
 LiveScience
 Mirabilis.ca
 Nat Geographic
 PhysOrg
 Science Daily
 Science News
 Texas AM
 Yahoo
 Excerpt, or Link only?
 


Thanks GeronL.

260 million years ago there were no burger joints.

To all -- please ping me to other topics which are appropriate for the GGG list.
 

· History topic · history keyword · archaeology keyword · paleontology keyword ·
· Science topic · science keyword · Books/Literature topic · pages keyword ·


43 posted on 03/24/2011 5:55:43 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (The 2nd Amendment follows right behind the 1st because some people are hard of hearing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Recovering_Democrat
Who says you get to define the rules?

I didn't set the rules. Obviously you are not scientifically inclined.

44 posted on 03/24/2011 6:17:45 PM PDT by SeeSac
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Red6

“Now the anthropologist will tell us that this tiger was also gay!”

In my typical smartass fashion I googled for a gay tiger image.

Going to look for eye bleach now...


45 posted on 03/24/2011 6:55:50 PM PDT by Rebelbase
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: illiac

Whoever wrote the headline should buy a dictionary. Archaeologists study human remains and other things made used or altered by humans. Paleontologists study ancient animal remains.


46 posted on 03/24/2011 7:15:45 PM PDT by XRdsRev (New Jersey - Crossroads of the American Revolution)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: youngidiot; SunkenCiv; blam; All

Its other teeth seemed to be of the grinding variety like plant eaters. The suggest that the teeth may have been defensive, or perhaps part of sexual display. I am going to guess they may have been used to rake into the earth for roots. At any rate these seem to have been Permian protomammalian/reptiles that showed great promise, but were wiped out by whatever caused the great Permian extinction, leaving the field to the early dinosaur types.

SC here is an interesting link you might want to post separately, a hot tea temperature brown dwarf star:

http://www.aolnews.com/2011/03/24/astronomers-discover-coldest-star-ever-video/?ncid=webmail


47 posted on 03/24/2011 10:44:41 PM PDT by gleeaikin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: illiac
"..lived 260 million years ago in what is now Brazil..."

Africa and South America were still connected at this time and would stay that way for another 140 million years.

48 posted on 03/25/2011 4:13:55 AM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeeSac

Obviously you have a higher opinion of your inductive skills than is accurate.


49 posted on 03/25/2011 6:33:42 AM PDT by Recovering_Democrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: XRdsRev; SunkenCiv
Archaeologists study human remains and other things made used or altered by humans. Paleontologists study ancient animal remains.

So a few thousand years from now, when they are studying our remains, will they be archaeologists, or paleontologists???

50 posted on 03/25/2011 6:42:45 AM PDT by bigheadfred (Beat me, Bite me...Make Me Write Bad Checks)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: gleeaikin; blam; SunkenCiv; Christian Engineer Mass; katana; XRdsRev
The lower jaw was incomplete, but they expect it would have had similar rows of teeth.

Everybody knows, (except for the LOOK AT ME, I HAVE A Ph.D(ers)!!) for example, a beaver's front teeth keep growing. So they are constantly having to chew on wood to help keep the teeth worn down to a usable level.

Without a lower jaw, or a number of other examples of this critter, who is to say those teeth simply didn't have corresponding lower teeth to wear against.

They would have grown until the animal couldn't forage properly and died.

51 posted on 03/25/2011 7:05:09 AM PDT by bigheadfred (Beat me, Bite me...Make Me Write Bad Checks)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Recovering_Democrat
Obviously you have a higher opinion of your inductive skills than is accurate.

I posted nothing about my 'inductive skills'. I posted about the scientific method.

52 posted on 03/25/2011 7:34:27 AM PDT by SeeSac
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: SeeSac

I’ll go ahead and use my inductive reasoning to surmise you are unable or unwilling to understand what I posted.

By the way, welcome to FR, noob.


53 posted on 03/25/2011 7:51:52 AM PDT by Recovering_Democrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: gleeaikin

Thanks gleeaikin. I found a link to that brown dwarf article (or rather a similar one, sorry), but haven’t decided whether to post it and the dozen or so others waiting in a holding file, or to do something useful, like the laundry. :’) The day at work was remarkably unproductive.


54 posted on 03/25/2011 5:07:12 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (The 2nd Amendment follows right behind the 1st because some people are hard of hearing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: bigheadfred

Well, if they’re digging around in Poland, they’ll be Polandtologists.


55 posted on 03/25/2011 5:07:52 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (The 2nd Amendment follows right behind the 1st because some people are hard of hearing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

What conclusions do you think they would make, there in the far future, digging around in Poland in strata from this general time period?

“These people shore gnu how to party. And this musta been a real gas. But they musta all et the brown acid. It is the only way to explain why they are all piled higher and deeper.”


56 posted on 03/25/2011 6:31:46 PM PDT by bigheadfred (Beat me, Bite me...Make Me Write Bad Checks)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Recovering_Democrat
I’ll go ahead and use my inductive reasoning to surmise you are unable or unwilling to understand what I posted.

Since it was irrelevant to my posts, I do not understand why you posted it.

57 posted on 03/28/2011 10:40:46 AM PDT by SeeSac
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: SeeSac

...and you’ve just confirmed my suspicion. G’nite.


58 posted on 03/28/2011 12:45:55 PM PDT by Recovering_Democrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-58 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson