Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Palin and Supporters Busted - Alaska Offered to Pay Palin Legal Costs
Independent Council Report | 6-26-10 | Bob J

Posted on 06/26/2010 9:37:58 AM PDT by Bob J

One of the most flogged excuses by both Palin and her supporters for her resignation as Governor of Alaska was that ethics complaints were "bankrupting" her. But the Independent Council Report issued in conjunction with the decision on her Legal Defense Fund says otherwise.

Not only does it show the State of Alaska offered to make payments for her legal costs it shows that even bfore the election the Palin campaign was making alternate plans to not only get the McCain campaign to pay for them but to hit up the Rnc AND set up a legal defense fund.

When confronted with Palin's legal bills in relation to the ethics violations charged against her, the State of Alaska offerred to pay begin paying bills to the tune of 100k. Now this was just the start and 100k was a round number they picked. Once they made the precedent of funding her legal expenses there would have been an obligation to continue...in for a penny, in for a pound.

But Palin and her legal advisors rejected the offer based IMO in a flimsy "accounting problem". It is clear the Palin's had bigger plans for much more money and the Alaskan offer was only going to get in the way of that.

Before you start reading these snippets from the report you must be aware that the first plan of attack from the Palinistas will be to portray the Independent Investigaror as partisan, compromised and corrupt. But you must also be aware that this is the very same IC that ruled in Paln's favor over the much more serious "Troopergate" allegations.

This report is full of eye opening relevations and I will be posting reports on several of them as time goes on. Here is the relevant section on this issue from the report.

"C. Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law.

1. Certain ethics complaints and legislative inquiries were conducted involving Governor Palin during the national presidential and vice presidential campaign when Governor Palin was a candidate for Vice President of the United States.

2. A contract for legal services was issued by the State of Alaska to the law firm of Clapp, Peterson, Van Flein, Tiemesson & Thorsness to represent Governor Palin, and others, in connection with these matters, for up to $ 100,000 at public expense.

3. No invoices were submitted to the State by Mr. Van Flein's law firm, pursuant to this state contract, due to the decision by Governor Palin and her attorneys that it would be too difficult to separate the functions of representing Governor Palin in her official capacity in the pending state-related matters, and representing her in other related campaign or partisan matters beyond the scope of the state contract. Thus, to avoid an appearance of impropriety or any allegation that legal fees were being paid for legal services beyond the scope of the state contract, Van Flein's law firm and Governor Palin agreed that funding for these services would be sought from sources other than state funding.

4. Among the sources of funding discussed were the Republican National Committee and the McCain campaign. However, after the conclusion of the presidential campaign, it became apparent that funding from the McCain campaign would not be forthcoming. Governor Palin and her advisors discussed alternative sources of funding to defray the continuing costs of defending past and future Ethics Act complaints, as well as other claims that may be brought as a consequence of serving in the Governor's Office. Among the sources discussed were the Republican Governor's Association and the creation of a trust. The trust would solicit private funding to pay for the past and future defense costs of Governor Palin, and potentially her family, her aides in the Governor's Office, and potentially, future governors and state officials.

EPIC FAIL - This is going to hurt...


TOPICS: Humor; Test Topic, Ignore It
KEYWORDS: alaska; anklebiters; attentionwhore; bobj; bobj4romney; bobjattentionwhore; bobjdouchebag; bobjibtz; bobjisanidiot; bobjthetroll; bobsdroolingagain; busted; dbagbobj; demint; fallonyoursarahsword; fisters4romney; gagdadbob; hunter; johnwayne; kittychow; legalcosts; lookatmeeeee; loserbobj; lynchmobmentality; onecosmos; palin; palinistasattack; palinistasgonuts; palinzombies; pds; ridethelightening; rinobobj; troll; umakekittiesangry; vkalert; whenmittbotsattack; youlie; zotbait; zottime
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 301-316 next last
To: rintense

Of course! That makes perfect sense!!


121 posted on 06/26/2010 11:18:34 AM PDT by CAluvdubya (WASS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies]

To: Skip Away

So are drooling Trolls.

Do you like Gladiator movies?

Get used to the words “President Palin”, because if she runs, she will be America’s next REAL president and that filthy traitor and his worthless tribe will be gone.

Justice it coming......

Have you ever been to a Turkish bathhouse?


122 posted on 06/26/2010 11:18:44 AM PDT by Gator113 (OBAMA IS NOT SUSTAINABLE.. IMPEACH OBAMA NOW..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: grey_whiskers
I think it's moose envy. He hasn't been the same since his old lady left and took his moose blanky.


123 posted on 06/26/2010 11:19:23 AM PDT by MestaMachine (De inimico non loquaris sed cogites- Don't wish ill for your enemy; plan it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: P-Marlowe
Too bad its not Fryday...
N3 {!} ?
124 posted on 06/26/2010 11:19:38 AM PDT by Fichori ('Wee-Weed Up' pitchfork wielding neolithic caveman villager with lit torch. Any questions?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: machogirl
Especially two days in a row.

Can we expect a third?

125 posted on 06/26/2010 11:20:45 AM PDT by CAluvdubya (WASS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: upsdriver

Or perhaps a combination of both.

But yes, very results driven individual.


126 posted on 06/26/2010 11:22:46 AM PDT by ozarkgirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Virginia Ridgerunner
As soon as I get my check, I'm going to turn around and send it right back to the new fund.

I'm with you! She is gong to need $$ to help with what we know will be the onslaught of cr*p thrown at her if she runs for Pres.

127 posted on 06/26/2010 11:24:24 AM PDT by CAluvdubya (WASS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: CAluvdubya

Joining in the piling on, 128 comments on a thread and no defense by Bob J of his vanity.

I guess “eviscerated” isn’t too strong a word to use when it comes to the debunking of this hit piece by Bob J.


128 posted on 06/26/2010 11:28:43 AM PDT by stylin_geek (Greed and envy is used by our political class to exploit the rich and poor.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

To: CAluvdubya
Can we expect a third turd?

There, fixed it.

129 posted on 06/26/2010 11:29:42 AM PDT by Eddie01 (All we every really knew was it was crazy to be doin' it any other way)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]

To: kanawa

That’s a beautiful picture, have not seen that before.

Used to have a boss and I’d accidently catch her praying at her desk. Excellent to find your “leaders” praying. Does my heart good.


130 posted on 06/26/2010 11:32:06 AM PDT by ozarkgirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: Bob J
So she refused to take taxpayers $$$ for her defense...oh my! Will her silly moral standards never stop. (Yes, this is sarcasm.)

This article is a convoluted piece of tripe.

131 posted on 06/26/2010 11:35:18 AM PDT by pepperdog (As Israel goes, so goes America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pepperdog
This article is a convoluted piece of tripe.

B itter
O ld
B arnacle

J unk

132 posted on 06/26/2010 11:37:42 AM PDT by b9 (P rinciple A uthenticity L eadership I ntegrity N ational pride)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies]

To: Hardraade
Who the h*ck are you, and why are you in my cereal? Didn’t I see you on Obama’s upper lip??

Found him in my soup earlier today. Saw the pic of him on ol'sugarlips. I remember when he was just a maggot....

133 posted on 06/26/2010 11:43:00 AM PDT by Louis Foxwell (He is the son of soulless slavers, not the son of soulful slaves.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Skip Away
A defense fund was set up privately (with legal private contributions) and the moniker "Official" was added at the webpage to differentiate it from any others that may or may not have been scams. IIRC, the fund has never been tapped and the money will be or is being reimbursed to the donors.

This coincidentally becomes an issue within a week of a $20 billion fund being extorted without any legal authority from BP, one of Obama's biggest corporate sugar daddies. Sorry, I've got no outrage for the one but plenty for the other.

134 posted on 06/26/2010 11:46:31 AM PDT by katana (For what is an Irishman ? But a .......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Sivana; Bob J
"REALLY generic name and no link. Source please?????"


The source appears to be the Independent Counsel's Report, which can be found here: http://media.adn.com/smedia/2010/06/24/14/Palin%20report%202010-06.71097.source.prod_affiliate.7.pdf
135 posted on 06/26/2010 11:51:26 AM PDT by rob777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ozarkgirl

It was taken prior to her going on stage to debate Joe Biden.


136 posted on 06/26/2010 11:56:44 AM PDT by kanawa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies]

To: grey_whiskers; Bob J
Dear Admin, can we have this troll banned already?

Why would you want a person banned for posting contrary opinions? Why can't you just debate him instead?

137 posted on 06/26/2010 12:02:17 PM PDT by EveningStar (Karl Marx is not one of our Founding Fathers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: EveningStar
Why would you want a person banned for posting contrary opinions? Why can't you just debate him instead?

We did debate him. We completely destroyed his argument. He has not replied to any of the points made.
That's the definition of a troll, when you keep making the same debunked points over and over again.

138 posted on 06/26/2010 12:07:17 PM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist (Mexico is the U.S. version of Hamas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist; Bob J
We did debate him. We completely destroyed his argument.

You haven't destroyed his arguments. You've merely offered counter arguments.

He has not replied to any of the points made.

Bob is reliable about posting replies. He's probably away from his computer conducting real world things. Give him time.

That's the definition of a troll, when you keep making the same debunked points over and over again.

Bob makes different points. You folks offer counter arguments. As to whether his arguments have been debunked, who's the final arbiter who determines that?

139 posted on 06/26/2010 12:20:49 PM PDT by EveningStar (Karl Marx is not one of our Founding Fathers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies]

Comment #140 Removed by Moderator


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 301-316 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson