Posted on 06/25/2010 9:43:42 AM PDT by Polarik
Sometime between October 31, 2008, and July 27, 2009, the dates of Health Director Chiyome Fukino's two press releases, Hawaii amended Obama's birth record. A brand-new Certificate of Live Birth (not Certification of Live Birth) was issued to him.
The DOH Director decides what goes in or gets taken out of birth records. She went on record as saying that "President Obama posted a copy of his certificate on his campaign website" even though she has refused to authenticate it for the past two years. This created a conundrum that could only be resolved by changing Obama's birth records to match what is in that online copy - which is a stone-cold forgery, and Fukino knows it!
That forged COLB also has its origin within the DOH: watch the video to find out the shocking truth as to whose COLB was used for the forgery.
You'll also realize that you've been staring at a forgery this whole time and not realizing that the most obvious sign of it was right there under your noses.
Not only did Obama get a new birth certificate, the certificate itself was designed with him in mind as Rev. 10/08 - coincidentally, the date of Fukino's first press release (10/31/08). Hawaii ditched the old Certification of Live Birth and switched to a hybrid form called a “Certificate of Live Birth” - formerly the name of the long-form birth certificate.
Say, "Aloha" to Obama's new COLB (Certificate of Live Birth):
Click on the thumbnail for a full-size copy
I like to second that, he’s nothing but a FINO!!!
Not sure if link will work. May have to shorten it.
RosettaSister “Polarik” posts 6/30/2008 – 12/31/2008 (These are ordered by date, so some are more relevant than others. But you can choose your own parameters.)
A “blog hog”??? Never heard that one before. Praytell, what does that even mean? You’re the one who created a false document, tried to pass it off as real, and is trying to drive hits to their YouTube Channel... You asked me what I’ve done to try to expose Obama, and I answered, and NOW your response is to say I’m a ‘blog hog’? I totally do NOT understand your logic.
As far as not being a “Birther”? That’s laughable. It REALLY is. I suppose you don’t remember all the discussions you and I had a few years back during the campaign, but that’s OK. You’ve been ‘gone’ for quite a while here at FR, so maybe you really DON’T remember.
You’re saying I came on here and ‘dominated’ the discussion. Am I not allowed to express my feelings on this free public forum? You’re the one that’s passing false information on this forum. As far as ‘commandeering” the thread? There are over 400 posts on this thread. I fail to see how my 5 posts are “hijacking” of the thread. Seems like people have been free to say what they want regardless of your claims otherwise.
I’m done speaking to you about this. Go ahead and play your games, but pulling stunts like this won’t help any of us to get the real truth out there.
ping a ding ding
FRAUD IN THE USA: the greatest birth certificate fraud in history is divided into a four-part Chapter One, a two-part Chapter Two, and three special feature videos (About the Author, It's the Conspiracy, Stupid, and Blue Hawaii: caught red-handed) that go along with these six.
Much of the confusion over the last video stems from the fact that it was never meant to be watched as the only video on the subject, but as a follow-up to my other videos - at least with the first and last ones. Because of YouTube restrictions on length, I had to break my full-length movie into 10 minute intervals.
My YouTube videos have been posted online between April 30 and May 3, but even before anyone had watched the first video, Part 1-1, the comments started flowing in. I know that some here will never watch any of it, but will comment on it, anyway. Please keep that in mind as you read their comments.
To acquaint you with what is in these videos, and to hopefully, engender enough interest to watch them in their entirety, I have written a synopsis of each one. The amount of time it took to produce these videos was massive, and I hope you taken that into consideration when watching them.
Part 1-1: Who is a natural-born citizen? This is an overview of the natural-born citizen (NBC) debate beginning from the time that John McCain 's eligibility was questioned by the mainstream media in February 2008 (actually it first began in 1998), to the Senate resolution declaring him a NBC. This section is a tour-de-force that could stand alone as an expose of media duplicity. The focus then shifts to the same eligibility questions about Obama but adding another wrinkle in that Obama had British citizenship at birth. Unlike their attacks on McCain, the media kept totally silent about Obama's citizenship dilemmas throughout 2008, and the first quarter of 2009. By mid-year, the media had launched into a blitzkreig on the "Birthers" - a term coined by Politico writer, Ben Smith - in a well-orchestrated attack on their credibility, sanity, and their geneology! Towards the end of Part 1, the viewer gets their first introduction to the political fact-checkers, Factcheck.org and Politifact.com and sets the stage for the in-depth analysis of these online media groups in Part 1-2.
Part 1-2: The third installment begins with an explanation of who are Politifact and Factcheck - the so-called, nonpartisan political fact-checkers that everyone references in defense of Obama's birth narrative. However, Politifact.com is the center of attention here for two reasons: one, they allegedly received a copy of Obama's iconic COLB image on the same day that the Daily Kos blog (and My.Barackobama.com) published the first COLB copies; and, two, Politifact was the first online media group to defend the birth certificate by attacking people who questioned its authenticity. More importantly, however, was the discovery that Politifact fradulently back-dated their first birth certificate story to June 13, 2008, when, in reality, it was posted late on the evening of June 24, 2008. Politifact's first legitimately-dated article appeared on June 25, and repeated the fraudulent dates that their nonexistent story cited. Politifact's statements about receiving the COLB from the Obama Campaign on June 12, and the quotes they received from Janice Okubo on June 13, were all lies, and prompted this author to research every story that Politifact published in 2008. There were more shocking discoveries that followed: (1) Politifact had intentionally fabricated a bogus rumor about Obama (that his middle name is "Muhammed") and repeatedly "debunked" it for the entire year; (2) Politifact never discussed Obama's citizenship or eligibility issues, and (3) in every other story that they wrote, Politifact continue to either lie outright about an issue or deceptively reword the issue and change its meaning. The evidence of this fraud, the reasons behind starting and spreading a bogus rumor, and the propaganda techniques they employed are explored in Part 1-3.
Part 1-3: Politifact used their bogus rumor and the bogus "debunking" that went along with it to lie about every facet of Obama's political life, from his associations with Rev. Wright and Bill Ayers, to being a "Committed Christian" and not a Muslim, to his "support" for Israel, to his healthcare plans, to ragging on Republicans, and so on. This part also uncovers the direct relationship between Politifact and "their friends at" Factcheck, and how the two took turns bashing Conservatives. Part 1-3 segways from this relationship to an introduction of Factcheck and Part 1-4 in which their pivotal role was to convince everyone that Obama's COLB exists and that they had "authenticated" it with photos.
Part 1-4: This is all about the forgeries: the first being the bogus "scan image" that went viral on the Internet between June 12 and August 16, 2008; and the second, more egregious, forgery in which a bogus COLB was physically-fabricated from laser-printed film on paper and then photographed. Here is the game-changer that conclusively proves that these photos were taken of a forged, fabricated COLB, and finally shoots down Factcheck's "Born in the USA" story - one that the media has lifted up to heaven as being the "ultimate proof" that Obama's COLB is authentic.
Part 2-1: There is some overlap between Part 2-1 and Part 1-4 specifically for viewers who skipped that part. This video is, really, a stand-alone in the sense that it directly targets the bogus COLB scans and, in particular, Factcheck's photo forgeries, explaining in detail how they were made. Part 2-1 is also a lead-in for Part 2-2, which is an instructional video that shows how to replicate the forged scan image and the film overlay used for the physically-fabricated COLB object. Basically, all of the major steps are presented, from scanning an actual COLB into Photoshop, to preparing the background and border layers, and things like the Seal and stamps.
Part 2-2: How the forgeries were made. This is a step-by-step guide for entry-level Photoshop users to create the main parts of the forgeries. Most of it is devoted to creating the individual text layers, merging them together, and then duplicating all of the idiosyncratic features of the scan image, such as those "pixel halos" and the "funky border."
About the author: Pretty much self-expanatory as to who I am, what is my experiences in scientific research, photography, computer graphics, and so on
Its the conspiracy, Stupid!: The title is a parody of Clinton's campaign motto, "It's the economy, Stupid!" and attempts to connect the dots among Factcheck, Politifact, Hawaii Health Department, and the Obama Campaign/Administration as they relate to the birth certificate fraud. The primary point of this video is that this is no theory, but a documented case of conspiracy, driving home the facts that the Left's responses to everything that has been said about Obama's birth certificate and his eligibility issues was planned out in advance, from the "liberal Birther" attacks on McCain beginning in February 2008 and ending in September 2008, the Senate resolution introduced by Barack Obama, the display of his COLB and a defense against the predictable reactions of the public, the press releases by Fukino in Oct. 2008 and July 2009, the coordinated media attacks in July 2009 on the "conservative Birthers," that continue today. The bottom line, of course, is that not a single piece of valid, concrete evidence has ever been presented that proves where Obama was born.
Blue Hawaii: caught red-handed!: Shakespeare asked, "What's in a name?" In the case of YouTube videos about Obama's birth certificate, the name is what drives visitors to the channel, more so than the content. The video with the mind-numbing voice-over, and the hackneyed spinning+newspaper+fake headlines, followed by a screenshot of WND's article, then three zoomed-in head shots of Obama that we've seen millions of times, that basically add nothing to what Tim Adam actually said. So, what appropriate title do they use?
"BREAKING NEWS! Hawaii Elections Official: Obama not born here! JUNE 10, 2010 - SMOKING GUN?"
This has accumulated 427,000+ views in the past two weeks. For what? Think it would get that many hits with a more accurate title like, "Elections official: "In my opinion, Obama was not born in Hawaii?" Why is it that nobody complained about that title? How was this "Breaking News?" Since when is someone's opinion a "Smoking gun?" So, yes, I used a cheesy title in place of "Blue Hawaii," and it's had 1,120 views since it went online yesterday.
Yet the bottom line is that this video is little more than an advertising billboard.
Blue Hawaii is all about how one person in the Hawaiian Health Department, Director Chiyome Fukino, has single-handedly thumbed her nose at the American people, patronizing them with, "I have seen his vital records. Obama was born in Hawaii. He's a natural-born citizen. I have nothing further to add," and told everyone to go stick it in their ears. We have known for two years that Obama was not born in Hawaii. If he was, Fukino would have personally thrown a luau in his honor.
Blue Hawaii is also about the source of the birth certificate fraud. Ground Zero. The buck started here. All anyone needs to do is process what Fukino, Okubo, and now Lingle have said - see how none of it fits - then ask yourself, "What are they hiding from us?"
Director Chiyome Fukino, with the blessing of Gov. Linda Lingle, knowing, full-well that Obama posted a forged COLB on his website and that this forgery contains false birth information <b>amended</b> Obama's birth records to match the falsified information on his forged COLB - thereby eliminating the inconvenient truth that the online COLB, which Fukino and Lingle acknowledged and which has never been authenticated by them, contained information that did not match Obama's original birth record.
Now, Fukino commissions a new "birth certificate form," which is basically a COLB, but adds the most important (after birth in the US) criteria for classifying the birth registrant as a "natural-born citizen," namely, the birth place of the father and mother. If father, mother, and child are all born on US soil, then they are all US citizens under the 14th Amendment, and the child is unquestionably a "natural-born citizen." However, there are only two ways that Fukino can claim that Obama is a natural-born citizen: one is by confusing natural-born with native-born, as per the 14th Amendment, or two, Obama's biological father is not Obama Sr. - a British citizen at the time of his birth - but someone else who is a US citizen.
The evidence against Obama Sr. being his daddy is as strong or stronger than the evidence in favor of him being his daddy, and that secret would destroy a lot of people.
“The third installment” should read “The second installment.”
The part number is right though
“The third installment” should read “The second installment.”
The part number is right though
“Has Smith ever taken a polygraph?”
Not that I am aware of.
A lie can travel halfway around the world while the truth is still putting on its boots.
— Mark Twain...
Dr Conspiracy - now there’s a real winner. Here’s your phony “Dr.” with phony credentials - or should I say, NO credentials of any kind.
Gee, I wish I could have a cool user name like Dr. Conspiracy.
As you can see, like all libs, he’s got a bit of a problem with independent rational thinking.
I especially like the neck/head job on the woman second from the left in the front row.
Yeah, I spotted that, too along with the rest of the doctoring. Poor Stanley looks to be in his 50’s, the geek look (pencil holder in shirt pocket) was not in vogue yet. Woman 4th from left had her neckline painted on to match that little black, 1960 Jackie Kennedy dress. Sailor’s whites are “whited out.”
I seem to remember that he did take a polygraph for Orly when he submitted the Kenyan BC to the court. I know for sure he signed a declaration attesting to the provenance of the document which was also submitted to the court. Of course the case got no where so none of that came under legal scrutiny.
I see a small line on her neck, right below the shadow of her jawline. Definitely not a necklace.
I was thinking of making this response as a separate post, but I do not have the time to do it. I would not mind it is someone else did.:-)
Please ping the list if you have not done so.
Thanks!!
I noticed the white out but not the neckline. Will have a look. Not exactly a collection of the beautiful people, are they?
What was/is the purpose of creating this “photo”???
Tancredo is calling for impeachment proceedings, but too many in Congress like the status quo and would rather stick their heads in the ground.
I’m hoping that a few of them will stand up and bash their fellow Republicans harder than the Dems and the media bash them, that this is NOT business as usual, and they can forget about their jobs once Bambi signs an EO authorizing amnesty and adding another 20 million registered Democrats to the rolls to vote them out of office.
Wait, I miscounted. It should be 40 million if you count the number of times they can vote.
It’s a terrible job. Try to get your head in that position. Too much neck, head too small, face at impossible position versus neck position. She looks alien.
No, there's not. The photo came from CBS.com. And here's the caption:
"Obama's father, Barack Obama Sr., center, is shown wearing floral leis on his graduation day at the University of Hawaii in the early 1960s."
Graduation day. Not "welcome committee."
Now, should I expect the response that CBS is wrong, the caption is false, and that random ignorant people online made up a different story for the photo that just happened to be the secret truth?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.