http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f2-2E65uFHM
Does Dr. Polland = Polarik?
Bump
Just vote the guy out of office the next Presidential election and be done with him ... :-)
I wish Michael Medved would view the videos.
Bookmark
| HOW CAN A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN'S STATUS BE "GOVERNED" BY GREAT BRITAIN? |
“When Barack Obama Jr. was born on Aug. 4,1961, in Honolulu, Kenya was a British colony, still part of the United Kingdom’s dwindling empire. As a Kenyan native, Barack Obama Sr. was a British subject whose citizenship status was governed by The British Nationality Act of 1948. That same act governed the status of Obama Sr.‘s children.http://fightthesmears.com/articles/5/birthcertificate.html
Factcheck.org goes on to say this about Obama Sr., Jr. and the British Nationality Act of 1948:
In other words, at the time of his birth, Barack Obama Jr. was both a U.S. citizen (by virtue of being born in Hawaii) and a citizen of the United Kingdom and Colonies (or the UKC) by virtue of being born to a father who was a citizen of the UKC.http://www.factcheck.org/askfactcheck/does_barack_obama_have_kenyan_citizenship.html
Even the modern day State Department rules discusses the problems associated with dual citizenship:
7 FAM 081: U.S. Policy on Dual Nationality:http://www.state.gov/documents/organization/86563.pdf(e)While recognizing the existence of dual nationality, the U.S. Government does not encourage it as a matter of policy because of the problems it may cause. Dual nationality may hamper efforts by the U.S. Government to provide diplomatic and consular protection to individuals overseas. When a U.S. citizen is in the other country of their dual nationality, that country has a predominant claim on the person.
...
the U.S. Supreme Court has stated that dual nationality is a "status long recognized in the law" and that "a person may have and exercise rights of nationality in two countries and be subject to the responsibilities of both." See Kawakita v. United States, 343 U.S. 717 (1952).
So, back to the question: "HOW CAN A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN'S STATUS BE "GOVERNED" BY GREAT BRITAIN?"
It can't. Of course not. Yet, right there, on his campaign web site F.T.S., it's stated that a foreign government "governed" Barry from birth and the reason it did, was that Barry inherited that foreign citizenship by way of his foreign national father (no matter where he was born), a fact backed up by Factcheck.org. Assuming, of course, that Sr. was his legal father at birth.
How, then, could he possibly be a "Natural Born Citizen" of the U.S.?
Barry Soetoro, the divided citizen at birth!
| Barack Obama a/k/a Barry Soetoro * | NOT Obama / Soetoro |
 |
 |
| * This assumes HI birth. A citizen of 2 countries at birth. |
|
Furthermore: Hawaii's Territorial Law, Chapter 57 - "VITAL STATISTICS, I", shown beginning pg 23 of 29, (the law in effect in 1961) allowed the parents (or grandparents or other relative) of baby's born anywhere in the world to be eligible to apply for a Hawaiian birth certificate. A mailed-in form (without mention of a hospital, doctor, or midwife) signed by one of his grandparents (who forged the parent signature(s)) would have been enough to set up a birth record and a birth certificate at the Dept of Health. The Dept of Health would (presumably) then have automatically sent the names of the parents, their address as given on the mailed-in form , the gender of the child, and the date of birth to the Honolulu Advertiser and Star-Bulletin. The address given for the parents in the newspaper announcements is actually, however, the August 1961 home address of Obama’s maternal grandparents Stanley and Madelyn Dunham [6085 Kalanianaole Highway], and not the 1961 home address of Barack Obama, Sr. [625 11th Ave].) This notification would then have automatically generated the newspaper announcements. (This was the practice of the Honolulu Advertiser and Star-Bulletin at the time).
Bottom line: Even IF (big IF) he was born in HI, he inherited his father's foreign citizenship as well, making him a US citizen by US law and a subject to the crown of her majesty the Queen of England by inheritance and England's law. He could not be considered a Natural Born Citizen as known by and as intended by the framers.
bookmarking for when I have an connection to view.
I object to this `expert’s qualifications. Since you haven’t laid a foundation—why we should accept that his opinion is worth anymore than my opinion or yours, or Rahm Emmanuel’s, his `expert testimony’ is irrelevant to prove the truth of the matters asserted, that is, your position that obama is the real deal and we should all just hang our heads and walk away, Renee.
His offering is held inadmissable.
OK .... I’ll do it for you. http://www.bitwine.com/advisors/16252-docrjp
He sounds like an expert in a number of things, except document verification. Maybe as a professional witness, with a straw in his shoe, he will prepare himself to say just about anything you want?
Bailiff, whack his pee-pee.
Have missed you here! Hope you’re lurking! Can’t wait to read your book. :)
mrkd
http://www.youtube.com/TheDrRJP
DrRJP Home Page
list of videos posted in order.
“Fraud in the USA: The end of the birth certificate controversy.”
bfl
I watched until — at 3:16 — he declares that “John McCain was born in a small military hospital ona US Naval Submarine Base in the Panama Canal Zone...”
As far as I’m concerned this guy destroyed his own credibility as a researcher with that statement.
John Sidney McCain III was born at the Colon Hospital, located at Avenida Melendez and 2nd Street, Manzanillo Island, City of Colon, Republic of Panama. The time of birth on the birth certificate issued by Panama Railroad Company (that owned the Colon Hospital) was 5:25 PM and the day and date of birth was Saturday, August 29, 1936.
http://politicalastrologyblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/john-mccain-birth-certificate.jpg
I think Polarik dropped out of Free Republic partly to do this book (he mentioned a project he was working on), and partly because he couldn’t take any more from the trolls that infest every birther thread.
He took the insults personally, which is something you need to learn to shrug off. After all, which is more important, who can deliver the worst insults, or who can speak the truth? Polarik spoke the truth, and backed it up with clear evidence, and did a great job of it.
By the way, “birther” is supposed to be an insult, but I take it as an honorable name—also, it is short, convenient, and to the point. I’m proud to be a birther. Meaning that I think, on good evidence, that Obama is covering up, allowing forged documents to be published in his name, lying under oath, and commiting crimes with the aid of Pelosi and others, and that the prostitute press is disgracing itself, worse than it ever did for Clinton, by covering up for him instead of doing their necessary job.
The Shakers and Quakers were given those names by their enemies, who intended to make fun of them because they claimed “to stand before God in fear and trembling.” Ha, ha, how funny. Well, the Quakers and Shakers were closer to the truth than their detractors. Their detractors are now all dead and forgotten, and the shameful intent behind those names is now also forgotten.
Thanks for finding this. I will view later for sure.
