Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

“Fraud in the USA: The end of the birth certificate controversy.”
YOUTUBE ^ | May 1, 2010 | Fred Nerks

Posted on 04/30/2010 7:45:37 PM PDT by Fred Nerks

Dr. Ronald J. Polland, PhD, has posted on YouTube a series of videos that are part of a book he has been writing for two years. The title is “Fraud in the USA: The end of the birth certificate controversy.”

As described in his, “About Me” video, Dr. Polland’s expertise is in Research and Program Evaluation, with over 31 years of post-doctoral scientific research experience. He is also the leading authority on scanning, photographing, (and videotaping) both sides of authentic, paper Hawaiian COLBs.

Because of YouTube length restrictions, Chapter 1 has been split over four parts (uploaded now) and Chapter 2 has been split over two parts (will be uploaded by 6pm EST). He has also posted an “About Me” video that has his full credentials and highlights important aspects of his career.

For those who wish to see it as one entire video, he will be posting the full-length version on Screencast.com and will be available tomorrow morning).


TOPICS: Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: birthcertificate; birther; certifigate; factcheck; fraud; naturalborn; naturalborncitizen; obama; politifact; whoisbarackobama
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 241-260 next last
To: Hoosier-Daddy

yes, seems Dr Pollard has great taste in music!

Interesting the grilling the MSM gave McCain about his status, and not a word about the other fellow...

MILLIONS OF ‘BIRTHER’ HITS - FOR A WORD THAT DIDN’T EXIST!

ALINSKY, CAN YOU SMELL IT?


21 posted on 04/30/2010 8:14:49 PM PDT by Fred Nerks (fair dinkum!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Fred Nerks

Talk about an obvious conspiracy.


22 posted on 04/30/2010 8:17:33 PM PDT by Hoosier-Daddy ( "It does no good to be a super power if you have to worry what the neighbors think." BuffaloJack)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Fred Nerks; All
How can a USURPER command our armed forces?
How can a USURPER sign any treaties with foreign governments?
How can a USURPER sign anything into law, let alone the health care monstrosity?

HOW CAN A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN'S STATUS BE "GOVERNED" BY GREAT BRITAIN?

“When Barack Obama Jr. was born on Aug. 4,1961, in Honolulu, Kenya was a British colony, still part of the United Kingdom’s dwindling empire. As a Kenyan native, Barack Obama Sr. was a British subject whose citizenship status was governed by The British Nationality Act of 1948. That same act governed the status of Obama Sr.‘s children.
http://fightthesmears.com/articles/5/birthcertificate.html

Factcheck.org goes on to say this about Obama Sr., Jr. and the British Nationality Act of 1948:

In other words, at the time of his birth, Barack Obama Jr. was both a U.S. citizen (by virtue of being born in Hawaii) and a citizen of the United Kingdom and Colonies (or the UKC) by virtue of being born to a father who was a citizen of the UKC.
http://www.factcheck.org/askfactcheck/does_barack_obama_have_kenyan_citizenship.html

 

Even the modern day State Department rules discusses the problems associated with dual citizenship:

7 FAM 081: U.S. Policy on Dual Nationality:

(e)While recognizing the existence of dual nationality, the U.S. Government does not encourage it as a matter of policy because of the problems it may cause. Dual nationality may hamper efforts by the U.S. Government to provide diplomatic and consular protection to individuals overseas. When a U.S. citizen is in the other country of their dual nationality, that country has a predominant claim on the person.

...

the U.S. Supreme Court has stated that dual nationality is a "status long recognized in the law" and that "a person may have and exercise rights of nationality in two countries and be subject to the responsibilities of both." See Kawakita v. United States, 343 U.S. 717 (1952).

http://www.state.gov/documents/organization/86563.pdf

So, back to the question: "HOW CAN A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN'S STATUS BE "GOVERNED" BY GREAT BRITAIN?"
It can't. Of course not. Yet, right there, on his campaign web site F.T.S., it's stated that a foreign government "governed" Barry from birth and the reason it did, was that Barry inherited that foreign citizenship by way of his foreign national father (no matter where he was born), a fact backed up by Factcheck.org. Assuming, of course, that Sr. was his legal father at birth.
How, then, could he possibly be a "Natural Born Citizen" of the U.S.?
Barry Soetoro, the divided citizen at birth!

Barack Obama a/k/a Barry Soetoro * NOT Obama / Soetoro
* This assumes HI birth.
A citizen of 2 countries at birth.

http://www.jeffersonsrebels.blogspot.com

Furthermore:  Hawaii's Territorial Law, Chapter 57 - "VITAL STATISTICS, I", shown beginning pg 23 of 29, (the law in effect in 1961) allowed the parents (or grandparents or other relative) of baby's born anywhere in the world to be eligible to apply for a Hawaiian birth certificate. A mailed-in form (without mention of a hospital, doctor, or midwife) signed by one of his grandparents (who forged the parent signature(s)) would have been enough to set up a birth record and a birth certificate at the Dept of Health. The Dept of Health would (presumably) then have automatically sent the names of the parents, their address as given on the mailed-in form , the gender of the child, and the date of birth to the Honolulu Advertiser and Star-Bulletin. The address given for the parents in the newspaper announcements is actually, however, the August 1961 home address of Obama’s maternal grandparents Stanley and Madelyn Dunham [6085 Kalanianaole Highway], and not the 1961 home address of Barack Obama, Sr. [625 11th Ave].) This notification would then have automatically generated the newspaper announcements. (This was the practice of the Honolulu Advertiser and Star-Bulletin at the time).

Bottom line: Even IF (big IF) he was born in HI, he inherited his father's foreign citizenship as well, making him a US citizen by US law and a subject to the crown of her majesty the Queen of England by inheritance and England's law. He could not be considered a Natural Born Citizen as known by and as intended by the framers.

23 posted on 04/30/2010 8:25:35 PM PDT by rxsid (HOW CAN A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN'S STATUS BE "GOVERNED" BY GREAT BRITAIN? - Leo Donofrio (2009))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Razz Barry
Bump for later
24 posted on 04/30/2010 8:27:03 PM PDT by Razz Barry (Round'em up, send'em home.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fred Nerks

bookmarking for when I have an connection to view.


25 posted on 04/30/2010 8:27:38 PM PDT by razorback-bert (So many questions, so few answers about Barry.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fred Nerks

Watch what I’m doing with my hand here. Don’t look at my other hand.


26 posted on 04/30/2010 8:28:08 PM PDT by Hoosier-Daddy ( "It does no good to be a super power if you have to worry what the neighbors think." BuffaloJack)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Star Traveler

Sorry if this sounds offensive but you seem to be demonstrating the very reason this is not happening! We no longer take the rule of law seriously. We no longer take the necessary action to preserve the republic. Jefferson and Franklin must be on their knees at the throne of God begging Him to just end our pathetic lazy misery. Our founders would have done far more than hold respectable tea parties and complain that nothing can be done. You think this mobster regime in DC will leave you a recognizable country by 2012? We are to concerned about decorum to really mind the fact the criminals in DC have shredded the Constitution and are stealing us blind. Oh yea, we can’t do anything. Just sit around on our fat buts and hope he gets voted out. That sure worked when the dull of mind in America voted him in. If there were a man in the weepublican party he would be holding up the Senate and House every day exposing the corruption. Do you ever wonder why they don’t?


27 posted on 04/30/2010 8:28:58 PM PDT by Conservative9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Conservative9

I’ve been around this problem with Obama as long as the next guy, as I was here during the run-up to the election too. And I know why he got elected... it’s pretty simple... he had 10 million more votes than we did.

And the simple solution to getting him out is to have more votes for our candidate in the next election — or else — you’re going to see Obama in here for another four years after that.

That’s what it comes down to no matter what else you want to talk about. You may decry “this” and “that” and “the next thing” ... but nothing has gotten him out of office. And I know what gets a President out of office... that’s simple, too. You have Impeachment by the House and Conviction by the Senate. But, if you think that’s happening, you’re not in touch with reality then. If you think anything else is going to get him out of office before the next election, you haven’t been in touch with reality for the last year and a half, either...

It very simply comes down to “vote the guy out of office” — if you don’t want him as President.

I would concentrate on what I know works 100% of the time, and is “based in reality” and works without fail — i.e., “if you get more votes than the opposition, your guy wins!” ... :-)


28 posted on 04/30/2010 8:36:03 PM PDT by Star Traveler (Remember to keep the Messiah of Israel in the One-World Government that we look forward to coming)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: mad_as_he$$; Star Traveler
No. He will do too much damage in the meantime. He needs to go ASAP.

The only right thing to do, and whatever it takes to remove this totally fraud!!!

29 posted on 04/30/2010 8:42:54 PM PDT by danamco (")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Man50D

I’m either too tired to be reading or I’m just not following this. Does this guy suggest that the “Won” IS a natural born citizen and we’ve been “alinsky-ed”?


30 posted on 04/30/2010 8:45:53 PM PDT by Mortrey (Impeach President Soros)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

Comment #31 Removed by Moderator

To: pissant

Well, if you don’t like reading my posts... all you’ve got to do is skip over them... doncha know ... LOL ...


32 posted on 04/30/2010 8:53:49 PM PDT by Star Traveler (Remember to keep the Messiah of Israel in the One-World Government that we look forward to coming)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Star Traveler; derSchurfer
If you want to get rid of him, your best shot is to vote him out of office. And that's the reality of the situation.

Wishful thinking and circumventing a Constitutional crime!!!

33 posted on 04/30/2010 8:53:51 PM PDT by danamco (")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Star Traveler

thanks for making the point again. I get it. It is okay with you for a fraudulent impostor to be stealing our country blind. It is okay with you that his thug cronies and judges are destroying the future of our children for the next four generations. It is okay with you that he steals from citizens and hands it off to corrupt marxist union thugs. Sorry, I misspoke. It is not okay with you. It is just not motivating enough to do anything for another three years. There is no law. Where there is no law the people perish.


34 posted on 04/30/2010 8:56:43 PM PDT by Conservative9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Fred Nerks

I object to this `expert’s qualifications. Since you haven’t laid a foundation—why we should accept that his opinion is worth anymore than my opinion or yours, or Rahm Emmanuel’s, his `expert testimony’ is irrelevant to prove the truth of the matters asserted, that is, your position that obama is the real deal and we should all just hang our heads and walk away, Renee.
His offering is held inadmissable.

OK .... I’ll do it for you. http://www.bitwine.com/advisors/16252-docrjp
He sounds like an expert in a number of things, except document verification. Maybe as a professional witness, with a straw in his shoe, he will prepare himself to say just about anything you want?
Bailiff, whack his pee-pee.


35 posted on 04/30/2010 8:57:12 PM PDT by tumblindice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Star Traveler

we all know you want Obama to serve out his term and you think he’s legitimate. we all know that. So kindly keep off these threads. You have zilch to add of value.


36 posted on 04/30/2010 8:57:24 PM PDT by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Conservative9

You just ran into one of the few SP!!!


37 posted on 04/30/2010 8:58:15 PM PDT by danamco (")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Star Traveler

STFU, dingbat


38 posted on 04/30/2010 9:02:09 PM PDT by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: pissant
You were saying ...

we all know you want Obama to serve out his term and you think he’s legitimate. we all know that. So kindly keep off these threads. You have zilch to add of value.

Only in your imagination... because you'll never see a post where I say that I ever wanted him in office (and you haven't ever seen such a post) ... sorry to disappoint you. I'm already on record as opposing him before the election and after the election and to this day.

But, as I've already posted, he was elected with 10 million more votes that we had. And I also happen to know from reading many other FReeper posts here on that previous Presidential election that part of that reason why he got more votes than us -- is that some FReepers (and I'm sure a lot of others who are not FReepers) did not vote for the GOP ticket (as I did).

And thus, this made the GOP ticket a loser in addition to Obama getting more votes. As I see it, there were FReepers and others who cut their own throats by not voting for the GOP ticket, which was the only Presidential ticket that could come close to even defeating Obama. Many abandoned the GOP for that election.

So, once again, if one wants to get Obama out of office, then they all better jump on the GOP ticket as that's the only one that is going to have any chance of beating Obama -- or else -- these GOP-defectors are going to hand us another defeat and give us Obama once again.

There's one part of the problem right there...

39 posted on 04/30/2010 9:03:14 PM PDT by Star Traveler (Remember to keep the Messiah of Israel in the One-World Government that we look forward to coming)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Star Traveler

STFU, dingbat


40 posted on 04/30/2010 9:04:18 PM PDT by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 241-260 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson