Posted on 03/18/2010 7:59:03 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach
Jo Nova has more from Frank Lansner on what older records, this time from weather balloons, tell us about recent adjustments to the temperature record. WUWT readers may recall Rewriting the decline where the graph from National Geographic below raises some questions about temperature graphs today.
Above: Matthews 1976, National Geographic, Temperatures 1880-1976
Frank Lansner has done some excellent follow-up on the missing decline in temperatures from 1940 to 1975, and things get even more interesting. Recall that the original hide the decline statement comes from the ClimateGate emails and refers to hiding the tree ring data that shows a decline in temperatures after 1960. Its known as the divergence problem because tree rings diverge from the measured temperatures. But Frank shows that the peer reviewed data supports the original graphs and that measured temperature did decline from 1960 onwards, sharply. But in the GISS version of that time-period, temperatures from the cold 1970s period were repeatedly adjusted years after the event, and progressively got warmer.
The most mysterious period is from 1958 to 1978, when a steep 0.3C decline that was initially recorded in the Northern Hemisphere. Years later that was reduced so far it became a mild warming, against the detailed corroborating evidence from rabocore data.
Raobcore measurements are balloon measures. They started in 1958, twenty years before satellites. But when satellites began, the two different methods tie together very neatlytelling us that both of them are accurate, reliable tools.
You can see how similar the data from both methods is:
So what do the raobcores tell us about the period before satellites started recording temperatures? They make it clear that temperatures fell quickly from 1960-1970.
The decline in the original graph in National Geographic in 1976 is apparently backed up by highly accurate balloon data, and was based on peer reviewed data: Budyko 1969 and Angell and Korshover (1975). These two sets overlap from 1958 to 1960, and correlate well, so stitching them together is reasonable thing to do and it doesnt make much difference which year is chosen from the overlap period (indeed any other choice makes the decline slightly steeper).
Whats thought provoking is that the raobcore data above is for 30N-30S, covering all the tropics on both sides of the equator, and yet still shows the decline. That begs the question of whether the Southern Hemisphere data has been adjusted too. It would be good to see the raobcore sets further up towards the arctic. It would also be good to look at the Southern Hemisphere. Where are the data sets and peer reviewed papers on temperature from 1965 to 1980? Id like to follow that up.
Three decades of adjustments
When did the funny business begin? By 1980 Hansen and GISS had already produced graphs which were starting to neutralize the decline. His graphs of 1987 and then 2007 further reduced the decline, until the cooling from 1960 to 1975 was completely lost.
Watch how the cooling trend of the 1960s to 1970s is steadily adjusted up so that 0.3 degrees cooler gradually becomes 0.03 rising (notice the red and blue horizontal lines in the graphs above).
Mathews Graph 1976: 1955 1965 was around 0.3C warmer than 1970s
Hansen/GISS 1980: 1955 1965 was around 0.1C warmer than 1970s
Hansen/GISS 1987: 1955 1965 was around 0.05C warmer than 1970s
Hansen/GISS 2007: 1955 1965 was around 0.03C cooler than 1970s
And in 1974, there was the fore-runner of the Its worse than we thought message.
Frank has more information and details on his blog Hide the decline.
If 1958 temperatures were similar to the 1990s, it rewrites the entire claim of all the unprecedented warming of late. Lansner also remind us of the photos taken in the arctic by submarines that surfaced around the north pole.
fyi
There’s lies, damn lies and global warming data!
Ping.
LOL!
Hide the decline and rewrite history? ( Global Warming.....??)
If you might add some of your comments on the thread on this one...I think I follow this a bit better.
Certainly more evidence of the “warmers” working on the data.
KFI's John and Ken Show was hammering on her the other day....she is now trying to represent herself as tough on crime....
It looks like an example of the Universal Adjustment Factor being applied to the past.
Clicking to enlarge the picture under “Three decades of adjustment,” shows just how blatant the scamming of the data was, It’s damning!
Yes the article is from JONOVA, who I found yesterday. But it later made it to WUWT, which is a great site because of the informed, and scholarly posters who comment there. I think we shall see more and more scientists and scholars falling off the AGW bandwagon, as they realize the data they were counting on to be valid, is proven to be bogus.
And it’s got Hansen’s group fingerprints all over it....
***************************
Central Europe record composed from 2 up to 14 stations, covering eastern half of Slovakia and bits of Poland, Ukraine and Hungary:
80ties are colder than beginning of 20th century. Quite similar to Armagh or CET record.
AND:
Central England air temperatures since 1659
From the comments at WUWT:
****************************************
Compare to above photos....of subs at the North Pole.
Another ooops moment?
Way bigger than that!
march 18, 2010...
*****************************EXCERPT*******************
Enneagram
We must remember that there were sent Clima-Gate emails to many countries all over the world, so there was a widespread cooperation to Hide the decline.
I wrote to my own country contact, which appeared as recepient of some emails. the same day climate-gate happened and he didnt answer me. In every country, as it has been shown here at WUWT weather stations were cherry picked and all those which recorded lower temperatures just disappeared.<
We saw this from the North Australia data....remember Darwin zero....
**************************my comment*****************************
Guess I could find that JoNova article on what they did to show North Australia Heating UP!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.