Finally, a judge with some sense.
1 posted on
03/09/2010 2:42:15 PM PST by
NCjim
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-30 next last
To: NCjim
2 posted on
03/09/2010 2:43:42 PM PST by
Dr. Ursus
To: NCjim
“...was dismissed in Small Claims Court.”
Presumably for lack of evidence...
To: NCjim
Aw, they could have provided him with some reading glasses.
4 posted on
03/09/2010 2:45:21 PM PST by
HiTech RedNeck
(I am in America but not of America (per bible: am in the world but not of it))
To: NCjim
Clearly the doctor in PVR got this wrong. This dude was on his period.
had the flight attendant touched this guy, the airline would have been REALLY open to a real lawsuit for providing medical care by non medical personnel.
I hope the airline got its expenses as well as the win.
5 posted on
03/09/2010 2:45:30 PM PST by
freedumb2003
( Tagline lost -- anyone seen it?)
To: Eaker
Relevant to your interests ping.
To: NCjim
So we have reached a point where men think they have the right to have a women look at his privates.
What if she had started laughing. would he have sued for emotional distress.
7 posted on
03/09/2010 2:45:45 PM PST by
Marty62
(former Marty60)
To: NCjim
It’s called a blart (bloody fart)
Unfortunately, they’re not too stinky, just messy.
9 posted on
03/09/2010 2:47:07 PM PST by
hkp123
To: Slings and Arrows
“Please look at my scrotum” ping.
To: NCjim
14 posted on
03/09/2010 2:52:19 PM PST by
albie
To: NCjim
And you wonder why tickets are so high?
To: NCjim
It is not the aircrew’s job to look at your sack. No way. No how. It’s just not.
17 posted on
03/09/2010 2:56:16 PM PST by
RichInOC
(No! BAD Rich! (What'd I say?))
To: NCjim
19 posted on
03/09/2010 2:59:28 PM PST by
wbill
To: NCjim

..."the diagnosis was made when you got out of the cab, and two red caps said"look at that a$$hole"
21 posted on
03/09/2010 3:02:08 PM PST by
Doogle
(USAF.68-73..8th TFW Ubon Thailand..never store a threat you should have eliminated)
To: NCjim
Since the flight attendant was not a medical professional, then he had no obligation to render medical aid.
An interesting factoid here: At the dawn of air travel in the 1930’s, Pan Am used to hire only registered nurses as flight attendants.
23 posted on
03/09/2010 3:02:17 PM PST by
Blood of Tyrants
(Truth - Reality through the eyes of God.)
To: NCjim
Doesn’t TSA have scanners for that?
25 posted on
03/09/2010 3:03:19 PM PST by
LouD
("against all enemies, foreign and domestic...")
To: NCjim
Flight attendants aren't trained to make a medical diagnosis. They don't have consent forms that are necessary and routine in medical offices. And it would be dangerous for flight personnel to come in contact with blood without protection from sterile gloves and clothing.
This case was, so to speak, nuts.
To: NCjim
Applause for Michele Pauze...!!
27 posted on
03/09/2010 3:05:13 PM PST by
Osage Orange
(A fear of weapons is a sign of retarded sexual and emotional maturity. - Sigmund Freud)
To: NCjim
“Excuse me sir, I am leaking bodily fluids, a potential biohazard; I would like you to subject yourself and your company to additional legal liability by coming into contact with my biohazardous bodily fluids and rendering a medical diagnosis and/or treatment. Wait? Where are you going? Why are you laughing? Won't someone PLEASE look at my scrote?”
29 posted on
03/09/2010 3:08:45 PM PST by
allmendream
(Income is EARNED not distributed. So how could it be re-distributed?)
To: NCjim; Lazamataz
this story needs the input of lazamataz! (probably not actually, but...)
30 posted on
03/09/2010 3:09:21 PM PST by
robomatik
(III%)
To: NCjim
Now that is strange, most of the male attendants I’ve seen look like the kind that would jump at the chance to inspect some guy’s “package”.................
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-30 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson