Posted on 02/15/2010 8:07:54 PM PST by GL of Sector 2814
WASHINGTON (Reuters) Scientists have created the hottest temperature ever in the lab -- 4 trillion degrees Celsius -- hot enough to break matter down into the kind of soup that existed microseconds after the birth of the universe.
They used a giant atom smasher at the U.S. Department of Energy's Brookhaven National Laboratory in New York to knock gold ions together to make the ultra-hot explosions -- which lasted only for milliseconds.
But that is enough to give physicists fodder for years of study that they hope will help them understand why and how the universe formed.
"That temperature is hot enough to melt protons and neutrons," Brookhaven's Steven Vigdor told a news conference at a meeting of the American Physical Society in Washington on Monday.
(Excerpt) Read more at news.yahoo.com ...
http://www.bnl.gov/bnlweb/pubaf/pr/PR_display.asp?prID=1074
This is the press release from Brookhaven
I think we've found the source of all of that globull warming scientists are worried about. Competing grants...
Scientists will be hiring philosphers for this I presume...
Nah. High energy physics is genuine science.
http://www.bnl.gov/rhic/default.asp
Big machines operating at these energy levels with the precision needed to collide heavy ions and then measure the results are pretty expensive, though.
What happens when ice melts? In physical terms, the average ambient energy, as measured by temperature, becomes greater than the binding energy of the water molecules, and so they break free of one another.
All you have to do is compare kT to the binding energy. If this is greater than the binding energy of the quarks comprising a proton or neutron, then they do indeed "melt".
“What happens when ice melts? In physical terms, the average ambient energy, as measured by temperature, becomes greater than the binding energy of the water molecules, and so they break free of one another.
“All you have to do is compare kT to the binding energy. If this is greater than the binding energy of the quarks comprising a proton or neutron, then they do indeed “melt”.”
With respect, that seems pretty strained. When water melts, H20 turns into H20. But when a proton “melts”, it turns into something else. But it’s definitely not a proton by another name.
The reporter might as well have described the result of heating H2 or CH4 as “melting.” It’s just binding energy that’s being broken.
Of course, the proton "melts" into its constituent quarks.
The reporter might as well have described the result of heating H2 or CH4 as melting. Its just binding energy thats being broken.
What is the result of heating H2 or CH4? You seem to have combustion in mind, but you don't mention O2. This does point out a flaw in the idea of "melting protons", though, since they are discrete combinations of 3 quarks, rather than an extended conglomeration of identical constituents, such as ice is.
If we admit "melting protons", I guess we would have to admit "melting hydrogen" in the center of the sun, where the electrons are no longer bound to their nuclei. Maybe a stretch, but it does seem to be a legitimate extension of the concept.
That’s racist.
And clocks.
They are obviously unfamiliar with my mom's turkey pot pie filling.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.