Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pssst! 2010 does not kick off a new decade
Nashua Telegraph ^ | 12/31/09 | W.B. Heffernan Jr.

Posted on 12/31/2009 2:36:00 PM PST by La Enchiladita

As we approach the end of the year 2009, we are seeing a repeat of the innumeracy that was so prevalent as we came to the end of 1999.

To wit, the first of January 2010 is not the first day of a new decade, but the first day of the last year of the first decade of the 21st century, which began Jan. 1, 2001.

Ours is a decimal system, based on the numbers 1 through 10, and when you count things – be they apples, fingers, cars or years – you begin with 1.

This is because if you don’t have at least one, you have nothing to count. Calling 2009 the end of the decade is akin to telling a child to count his fingers as follows, 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, and telling him: “You have 10 fingers.”

As final emphasis, in our decimal system any number ending in zero is the final number in a group of 10. A number ending in two zeroes is the final number in a group of a hundred, whilst three zeroes is the last in a group of a thousand, etc.

Why is this hard for otherwise intelligent people to grasp?

Oh, and in passing, saying that “most people think this is the end of the decade” is of no import whatsoever. Numbers, arithmetic, mathematics is not subject to “what people think.”


TOPICS: History; Science
KEYWORDS: happy2010; notanewdecade
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-106 next last
To: La Enchiladita

A decade is any 10 years, this clown is wrong!!!


81 posted on 12/31/2009 4:02:09 PM PST by dalereed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lower55

You would be correct......


82 posted on 12/31/2009 4:04:07 PM PST by deport (62 DAYS UNTIL THE TEXAS PRIMARY....... MARCH 2, 2010)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: DennisR

Wrong. The first year is ONE, not zero. Think, Man. sd


83 posted on 12/31/2009 4:05:32 PM PST by shotdog (I love my country; it's my government I'm afraid of.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: La Enchiladita

This is dumb.

A person is 1 year old when they’ve put 12 months behind them.

A person is 10 years old when they’ve completed 10 years.

2010 is 10 years after 2000. And I’m going to consider it to end of one decade, and the beginning of another.


84 posted on 12/31/2009 4:05:42 PM PST by Theo (May Rome decrease and Christ increase.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: discostu
Well, to play the devil's advocate...maybe the powers that be didn't think they had to specify 0 A.D. Perhaps they assumed that everyone would know?

Is it possible to get one or more before none?

85 posted on 12/31/2009 4:07:46 PM PST by Freedom Dignity n Honor (There are permanent moral truths.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: shotdog

I heard Dr. Williams say “It’s not a new decade! The new decade — the second of the second millennium — does not start until 365 days from today.”

I didn’t hear his discussion with the caller.


86 posted on 12/31/2009 4:09:57 PM PST by La Enchiladita (The Light shines in the darkness.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: deport

I agree with you and that is what I said in different words.

But now, I am worried about that week between his birth and what we call the start of the year. Why don’t his birthday and the new year coincide?


87 posted on 12/31/2009 4:12:15 PM PST by La Enchiladita (The Light shines in the darkness.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: Lower55

Anno Domini (A.D.) The Christian era, begins with A.D. 1 in the Julian and Gregorian calendars. Presumed to be the birth year of Christ for the purposes of those calendars. The date was not correct.

A.D. is now a politcally incorrect term, you could probably get arrested for using it in some progressive countries. C.E. is now used, the Common Era - no God involved don’t you see. BC becomes BCE, before common era, so much more inclusive, non threatning, and fitting with the goals of multiculturalism and diversity. You’ll learn this in reeducation camp.


88 posted on 12/31/2009 4:13:10 PM PST by centurion316
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: Lower55

Okay, I meant time elapsed from 0 A.D. through the END of 1 A.D.


89 posted on 12/31/2009 4:13:52 PM PST by La Enchiladita (The Light shines in the darkness.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: La Enchiladita

Maybe we could go to the lunar calendar and really screw things up for counting.... lol.


90 posted on 12/31/2009 4:15:42 PM PST by deport (62 DAYS UNTIL THE TEXAS PRIMARY....... MARCH 2, 2010)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: La Enchiladita

Some column headings will have mm/dd/ccyy to indicate for you to enter the 4 digit year which should properly be yyyy not ccyy. The line of thinking is cc=20 yy=09 when actually it’s the 21st century.

ccyy = 2109 (as of 12/31/2009)
yyyy = 2009 (as of 12/21/2009)


91 posted on 12/31/2009 4:15:42 PM PST by CodeJockey (Poor Al Gore. Global warming completely debunked via the very Internet he invented. Oh, the irony!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: La Enchiladita
I had a mini-rant about this a couple of weeks ago as well, based on the Dazed & Confused mag cover I posted here. I've seen a bunch of these premature "retrospectives". Amazing.
92 posted on 12/31/2009 4:19:14 PM PST by AnnaZ (I keep 2 magnums in my desk.One's a gun and I keep it loaded.Other's a bottle and it keeps me loaded)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Freedom Dignity n Honor

I think the “powers that be” didn’t really care much about declarations of decades and centuries and stuff like that. Chunk up history into blocks is something a people with a lifestyle of luxury get to do, subsistence farmers tend to be a little too busy staying alive to care what decade it is and why.


93 posted on 12/31/2009 4:21:39 PM PST by discostu (The Bluebird of Happiness long absent from his life, Ned is visited by the Chicken of Depression)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: Petronski

From a cultural standpoint, the eighties were Reagan’s decade, so his inauguration day was the key date.

The first decade of the 21st century began at 8:46am on September 11, 2001. The attacks have defined the decade.

From a purely math standpoint, the next decade begins on the first day of the year 2011, but from a cultural standpoint, the decade really begins on a critical moment that will end up defining the decade.


94 posted on 12/31/2009 4:24:39 PM PST by MediaMole
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: MediaMole

You scored nil.


95 posted on 12/31/2009 4:39:06 PM PST by Petronski (In Germany they came first for the Communists, And I didn't speak up because I wasn't a Communist...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: Joan Kerrey
I guess I am more practical. 2000 was a big year for me because it was the year that all computers had to be reprogrammed to work accommodate 4 digit years. Previously most computer had two digit years and the 19 was assumed. Well that was not going to work once 2000 hit, whether or not it was the official start of the millennium or not.

I think that is why the disconnect happened. If we had waited until the official start of the millennium to complete the changes there would be a lot of things that didn't work quite right. And I think that is where all this trouble started.

96 posted on 12/31/2009 5:04:41 PM PST by w1andsodidwe (Jimmy Carter(the Godfather of Terror) allowed radical Islam to get a foothold in Iran.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: La Enchiladita

So don’t call it a decade. It’s the time when, for the next ten years the date will end with 201_.

Call it whatever you want. the odometer is turning over.

Happy New Year.


97 posted on 12/31/2009 5:13:36 PM PST by Canedawg (FUBO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: discostu
I agree only I am sure subsistence farmers didn't even know how to read but the upper classes and clergy would have the luxury to worry about such things.

To me, when Jesus was 6 months old, it was .5 A.D. Something starts when it starts and that's usually from zero or nothing to something.

Of course, I'm a computer science person and we start stuff with 0's. *shrug* People shouldn't get so worked up about such stuff, we have other things to worry about.

98 posted on 12/31/2009 5:27:19 PM PST by Freedom Dignity n Honor (There are permanent moral truths.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: La Enchiladita

Thanks for a little truth telling. Even I know that the new decade doesn’t start tomorrow. That makes me smarter that most of the idiots on TV today!


99 posted on 12/31/2009 5:31:10 PM PST by Sunshine Sister
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TXBlair

Why yes, I believe I was. :)


100 posted on 12/31/2009 5:32:13 PM PST by GOP_Raider (You can now check out GOP_Raider on Twitter at twitter.com/RaiderUte)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-106 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson