Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Palin's SarahPAC Backs Portman, Graham, Hatch (Palin loves RINOs)
CQPolitics ^

Posted on 08/28/2009 5:07:24 PM PDT by Falcon28

Former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin's SarahPAC has donated money to the campaigns of Sens. Lindsey Graham of South Carolina and Orrin Hatch of Utah, as well as to Republican Ohio Senate candidate Rob Portman, according to a Friday filing with the Federal Election Commission.

The exact amounts of the contributions were not reported, but Palin had to list the names of candidates she had financially supported to make SarahPAC a bona fide political action committee.

Her contributions to Arizona Sen. John McCain, for whom she served as a running mate in the 2008 presidential campaign, and Alaska Sen. Lisa Murkowski had been reported in a previous filings

(Excerpt) Read more at blogs.cqpolitics.com ...


TOPICS: Free Republic Policy/Q&A
KEYWORDS: 2010; 2012; alaska; elections; graham; hatch; johnmccain; mccain; murkowski; pac; palin; portman; rino; sarahpac; sarahpalin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-170 last
To: MaggieCarta
"I most certainly do not have a problem with the truth.

Something you cannot escape is a public lie.

When I corrected your first misleading statement with "You never supported Palin, ever, you were attacking her on freerepublic the very day that she was chosen by McCain, but you are a long time Romney supporter.", you posted a more blatant lie.

"Not true on both counts."

The problem for you is that your posting history is permanent and I was posting the truth from your posting history which is what you tried to deny
"It most certainly is true, your posting history is permanent.
You are a long time Romney fan and you started going after Palin on the day that she was first announced and you never let up.
You seem to have a little problem with truth, no wonder you keep going after Governor Palin."

You have been caught out in a bald faced lie and that is a shame that is there for everyone to see in your posting history, that would embarrass a conservative but I do notice that it is rarely a big deal to the typical romneybot.

It is called lying and making up posts for whatever thread you are on at the time and being caught by someone simply looking at your posting history.

161 posted on 09/01/2009 9:11:47 AM PDT by ansel12 (Romney (guns)"instruments of destruction with the sole purpose of hunting down and killing people")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 160 | View Replies]

To: ansel12
??????

You are not responding at all to the substance of any of my earlier posts. Talk about a "bot."

Kindly understand, I don't "make up posts for whatever thread I am on at the time." How dare you.

Well...ok...except for the posts where I'm escaping from my straitjacket and the locked room on the PDS ward at the local psych facility to find my way to an unattended keyboard in order to post on FR. I made some of that up. I have a laptop.

162 posted on 09/01/2009 10:35:03 AM PDT by MaggieCarta (We're all Detroiters now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 161 | View Replies]

To: MaggieCarta

Because you are a liar that will post anything on a particular thread.

By being willing to lie you remove the possibilities of someone being able to interact with you on a conservative forum, being a liar is more like trolling, it doesn’t lead to and it isn’t intended to lead to honest discussions.

Revealing a willingness to lie on a forum removes you from the credible list.


163 posted on 09/01/2009 11:58:11 AM PDT by ansel12 (Romney (guns)"instruments of destruction with the sole purpose of hunting down and killing people")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 162 | View Replies]

To: ansel12; All
Because you are a liar that will post anything on a particular thread.

By being willing to lie you remove the possibilities of someone being able to interact with you on a conservative forum, being a liar is more like trolling, it doesn’t lead to and it isn’t intended to lead to honest discussions.

Revealing a willingness to lie on a forum removes you from the credible list.

I'm sorry, ansel12, but you should provide specific instances of my "lies." Your bizarre ad hominem attack (can I say "attack the man" if I'm a girl?) demands substantiation. I insist that you provide a specific post so that I may respond to that.

And, Dude/Dudette-- I am being quite truthful when I say that you are a lousy Palin apologist.

In the first place, every time you "paste and post" you bump a thread that might prompt readers to examine the filings from SarahPAC for themselves and discover that she has indeed, aligned herself with a certain RINO element, at least initially.

Secondly, you should have directed me to another FR thread that reports that SarahPAC has seen the light recently and has donated to Republicans of a more conservative nature. While these donations are not yet captured on the latest FEC filings, I have no doubt that they will appear in subsequent filings.

I think it is shameful that you consider yourself a Palin supporter (and ostensibly conservative), yet you will not respond in a civilized, intelligent manner to the substance of my posts.

Frankly, I have some very real concerns about Mrs. Palin's "conservatism"--at best, I have come to think that she is a "compassionate conservative." At worst, she sounds like a populist progressive at times. A cursory peek at the SarahPAC disbursements did nothing to reassure me otherwise.

To all FReepers of good will--I'm sorry, I have said before that I know that Mrs. Palin is the sweetheart of FR, but I just don't like her.

164 posted on 09/02/2009 5:13:23 AM PDT by MaggieCarta (We're all Detroiters now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 163 | View Replies]

To: MaggieCarta
"I most certainly do not have a problem with the truth.

Something you cannot escape is a public lie.

When I corrected your first misleading statement with "You never supported Palin, ever, you were attacking her on freerepublic the very day that she was chosen by McCain, but you are a long time Romney supporter.", you posted a more blatant lie.

"Not true on both counts."

The problem for you is that your posting history is permanent and I was posting the truth from your posting history which is what you tried to deny
"It most certainly is true, your posting history is permanent.
You are a long time Romney fan and you started going after Palin on the day that she was first announced and you never let up.
You seem to have a little problem with truth, no wonder you keep going after Governor Palin."

You have been caught out in a bald faced lie and that is a shame that is there for everyone to see in your posting history, that would embarrass a conservative but I do notice that it is rarely a big deal to the typical romneybot.

It is called lying and making up posts for whatever thread you are on at the time and being caught by someone simply looking at your posting history.

165 posted on 09/02/2009 8:29:52 AM PDT by ansel12 (Romney (guns)"instruments of destruction with the sole purpose of hunting down and killing people")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 164 | View Replies]

To: ansel12
*sigh*

Thanks for playing.

166 posted on 09/02/2009 10:12:58 AM PDT by MaggieCarta (We're all Detroiters now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 165 | View Replies]

To: Falcon28
Portman is having trouble.

GOP moderation hobbles Portman's Ohio run

167 posted on 05/11/2010 10:20:53 PM PDT by FTJM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Man50D
Then she will have to sacrifice any conservative principles to gain national support. That's the same syndrome the rest of the OP has fallen into over the years.

That isn't true. Did Obama sacrifice his Marxist principles when he got elected with the support of moderate Democrats and Independents? Sarah Palin can still be her own person should she be elected president. In fact, I would trust her to stay true to her principles far more than any other talked about candidate for president.

168 posted on 05/11/2010 10:28:08 PM PDT by upsdriver (ret.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: popdonnelly
Fight with the Democrats, not other Republicans. Or their won’t be anything left of your country.

Amen!!!! I want the best conservative candidate possible nominated but this desire to destroy everyone else in the process is not helpful. People should pick their candidate, accentuate their positives. They should sell others on why their candidate is the best choice.

169 posted on 05/11/2010 10:40:03 PM PDT by upsdriver (ret.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: FTJM
I'm not a big fan of Portman. He's no conservative and he's an open-border nut as well. Very disappointing that this is who we're stuck with in Ohio. No more bloody RINOs.
170 posted on 05/12/2010 9:57:24 AM PDT by Falcon28
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 167 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-170 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson