Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Do Single Women Seek Attached Men?
New York Times ^ | August 13, 2009 | JOHN TIERNEY

Posted on 08/13/2009 9:40:05 AM PDT by nickcarraway

Researchers have debated for years whether men or women are likelier to engage in “mate poaching.” Some surveys indicated that men had a stronger tendency to go after other people’s partners, but was that just because men were more likely to admit engaging in this behavior? Now there’s experimental evidence that single women are particularly drawn to other people’s partners, according to a report in the Journal of Experimental Social Psychology by two social psychologists, Melissa Burkley and Jessica Parker of Oklahoma State University.

Noting that single women often complain that “all the good men are taken,” the psychologists wondered if “this perception is really based on the fact that taken men are perceived as good.” To investigate, the researchers quizzed male and female undergraduates — some involved in romantic relationships, some unattached — about their ideal romantic partner.

Next, each of the experimental subjects was told that he or she had been matched by a computer with a like-minded partner, and each was shown a photo of an attractive person of the opposite sex. (All the women saw the same photo, as did all the men.)Half of the subjects were told that their match was already romantically involved with someone else, while the other half were told that their match was unattached. Then the subjects were all asked how interested they were in their match.

To the men in the experiment, and to the women who were already in relationships, it didn’t make a significant difference whether their match was single or attached. But single women showed a distinct preference for mate poaching. When the man was described as unattached, 59 percent of the single women were interested in pursuing him. When that same man was described as being in a committed relationship, 90percent were interested. The researchers write:

(Excerpt) Read more at tierneylab.blogs.nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: Conspiracy; Science; Society
KEYWORDS: godsgravesglyphs; men; science; women
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-73 next last
To: Vigilanteman

Just one, I told the Mrs. “You don’t put it up for me. Why do I have to put it down for you?”


Yep...we fight gravity when lifting the seat...tell her that ;)


41 posted on 08/14/2009 2:02:31 AM PDT by chasio649 ( Palin 2012...'nuff said!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Steve Van Doorn

Beginning at the base knuckle of the fourth finger, cut carefully along the joint while grasping the distal phalangeal and tugging just enough to allow a clean incision along the joint with the palm; holding the proximal phalangeal tightly while extending outward will aid in the separation; make sure you have adequate antiseptic solution and gauze at hand to stanch bleeding as you slide the offending band of foreign material from the severed member.

To reattach, simply reverse the removal procedure being sure to suture all severed tendons and/or nerves; for additional fingers it is advisable to have a separate set of sterile instruments to avoid potential complaints from ‘injured’ parties...


42 posted on 08/14/2009 2:07:18 AM PDT by Old Professer (The critic writes with rapier pen, dips it twice, then writes again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: ryan71; boxerblues; Hammy; Petruchio; Phinanceguy; DollyCali; Yorlik803; ...

Been a while since a pingable thread came along. Sorry, FRiends.
43 posted on 08/14/2009 2:10:51 AM PDT by RandallFlagg (30-year smoker, E-Cigs helped me quit, and O wants me back smoking again?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Old Professer

yeah real funny :)


44 posted on 08/14/2009 2:21:09 AM PDT by Steve Van Doorn (*in my best Eric cartman voice* 'I love you guys')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: RandallFlagg
Do Single Women Seek Attached Men?

Of course we do , they are used to being bossed around ......just joking for those who haven't had their coffee
45 posted on 08/14/2009 5:50:01 AM PDT by boxerblues
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
Women are the most competitive creatures on the planet.

They can't resist the urge to take another woman's man.

46 posted on 08/14/2009 5:51:30 AM PDT by ryan71 (We're in deep kimchi!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RandallFlagg

Hello! Please add me to your Single Freeper ping list. Thank you.


47 posted on 08/14/2009 5:58:49 AM PDT by LuvFreeRepublic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: cammie

“One’s considered permanent, the other is temporary”

I tend to disagree here.
One is certainly permanent; or at least that is the way it is supposed to be.

The other is not necessarily temporary at all. Rather that is your perception of the matter. Within that relationship there may be the goal of moving toward permanence, though simply not fully arrived just yet. Many couples date with the intent of finding the permanent mate and to that end do not view dating as temporary, rather the preface to permanence. Granted, often, after dating for a period of time, one, or both realize that a permanent relationship is not ideal and so they break it off.

For me, I date with a purpose.
Certainly to enjoy the time with one I’m attacted to, but also to find the one with whom I can settle down. In that, I don’t go into any relationship viewing it as temporary. Rather, I view it as an opportunity to explore permanence.

...and to enjoy the time spent with the one I’m dating. Obviously.


48 posted on 08/14/2009 6:10:05 AM PDT by woollyone (I believe God created me- you believe you're related to monkeys. Of course I laughed at you!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: LuvFreeRepublic

You’re in. Thank you.


49 posted on 08/14/2009 6:15:04 AM PDT by RandallFlagg (30-year smoker, E-Cigs helped me quit, and O wants me back smoking again?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

it is just a coo coo (sp?) bird behavior.

Humans do MANY differnet things. To say this is a set behavior in such a large population is dubious at best.

Star Trek was cancelled in the 1960’s but the small fan base kept the franchise alive. Does this mean EVERYONE in the USA is a latent fan of the series? don’t think so.


50 posted on 08/14/2009 7:19:44 AM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RandallFlagg

Please add me to your ping list. Thanks!


51 posted on 08/14/2009 9:38:19 AM PDT by HoneysuckleTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: cammie

I’m talking specifically about marriages and drawing an analogy to the study about “couples.” In either case the specific behavior is still about horning in on someone else’s relationship. It’s not that complicated. And I would disagree that all “relationships” are impermanent. I know many lifelong unmarried couples who are very much committed, short of a state license. So just because someone isn’t “married” doesn’t mean a neurotic interloper wouldn’t be attempting to ruin what for all intents and purposes is a “marriage,” whether sanctioned by the state or not.


52 posted on 08/14/2009 9:39:09 AM PDT by Trod Upon (Obama: Making the Carter malaise look good. Misery Index in 3...2...1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Trod Upon

question: would not the success of the relationship breaker (at least in part) be based on her ability to offer something the current woman was unable or unwilling to provide?

Depends on what you wanted.

In the end, it seems it is all about the maturity of the people in the relationships.

It is a paradox. If all of the good ones are taken and you have to be taken to be “good” NOBODY is good until a leap of faith happens..

ahhhh amore....


53 posted on 08/14/2009 10:33:25 AM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: HoneysuckleTN

You’re in. Thank you.


54 posted on 08/14/2009 4:40:31 PM PDT by RandallFlagg (30-year smoker, E-Cigs helped me quit, and O wants me back smoking again?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: martin_fierro

Sperm Travels Faster Toward Attractive Females
[this thread is useless without pictures]
discovery | Jennifer Viegas
Posted on 08/13/2009 5:27:09 AM PDT by JoeProBono
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/2314914/posts


55 posted on 08/16/2009 7:02:50 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/__Since Jan 3, 2004__Profile updated Monday, January 12, 2009)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Only if he’s rich.


56 posted on 08/16/2009 7:06:14 PM PDT by madison10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: StayAt HomeMother; Ernest_at_the_Beach; 1ofmanyfree; 21twelve; 24Karet; 2ndDivisionVet; 31R1O; ...

· join list or digest · view topics · view or post blog · bookmark · post a topic ·

 
Gods
Graves
Glyphs
To all -- please ping me to other topics which are appropriate for the GGG list.
GGG managers are SunkenCiv, StayAt HomeMother, and Ernest_at_the_Beach
 

·Dogpile · Archaeologica · ArchaeoBlog · Archaeology · Biblical Archaeology Society ·
· Discover · Nat Geographic · Texas AM Anthro News · Yahoo Anthro & Archaeo · Google ·
· The Archaeology Channel · Excerpt, or Link only? · cgk's list of ping lists ·


57 posted on 08/16/2009 7:06:42 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/__Since Jan 3, 2004__Profile updated Monday, January 12, 2009)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
I've been married for over 25 years now. When I was single, I know if I went to a party with a date, a lot more girls would flirt with me and try to give me their numbers than would if I was alone. I noticed when I tended bar that girls hit on me all the time, also.

I think women like the idea of an escape hatch. If I'm behind the bar, they can leave if they wish, and if I'm at a party with another woman, they could do the same.

(Some) Women do like to try and take a guy away from another woman. It's their version of an athletic event.

58 posted on 08/16/2009 7:08:06 PM PDT by Richard Kimball (We're all criminals. They just haven't figured out what some of us have done yet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Forget it girls, I’m taken...


59 posted on 08/16/2009 7:14:48 PM PDT by null and void (We are now in day 207 of our national holiday from reality. - 0bama really isn't one of US.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

Not in a biker bar, you don’t.


60 posted on 08/16/2009 7:24:20 PM PDT by Salamander (Like acid and oil on a madman's face, reason tends to fly away..............)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-73 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson