Posted on 07/05/2009 12:58:12 PM PDT by ckilmer
A private investigator has released to WND an affidavit that casts doubt on whether Barack Obama's family lived at the address listed in the published notice of his birth in 1961.
(Excerpt) Read more at worldnetdaily.com ...
During the Rodney King riots in Los Angeles, marauding gangs of black youths decided to drive out of their neighborhoods and burn nice office buildings in the surrounding suburbs. Destruction of prime real estate buildings racked up insurance claims into the billions. This strategy was probably encouraged by black community organizers to hit the system back for letting the LA cops off the hook over the beating trial. This factor played a role in the trial of the black teenager rioters for their beating of an innocent white truck driver caught on heliopter video. The trial was strange because the judge made several strange rulings during the trial that let the black teenagers off on a lesser charge than attempted murder. My buddies in LA basicly informed me that the local government was pressured by the insurance companies that they did not want another round of rioting that already cost them plenty in property claims. Rule of thumb in riots (I have lived thru two in 1960’s). It takes about 72 hours for the authorities to take full control assuming timely decisions are made. A lot of damage can be done in that time frame. LA took about five days before the NG and Fed troops entered the city.
) fraudulently inserted by Grandma Dunham in order to ensure her grandson would be eligible to be president.
Well not to be president but rather to be a citizen.
It seems to me that if you were going to fabricate a birth announcement, you would pick one of the addresses more frequently cited for the Obamas.
seems reasonable to me too. However, if this stuff were strictly on the up and up— why not then just release the original long form birth certificate.
the worst it could would be to show that obama’s kenyan dad is not really his dad but rather — the family friend. but in that instance the case is closed. obama is a natural born citizen.
Beatrice Arakaki affirmed she was a neighbor of the address listed. She has lived at her current residence of 6075 Kalanianaole Highway from before 1961 to the present. Mrs. Arakaki said that Obama, his ‘mama,’ and his ‘papa’ never lived there. Arakaki told investigators that she had no recollection of Obama being born or of the family living next door having a black child born to a white mother.
No.
There is an excellent brief posted in July of last year which sets out a detailed analysis of the citizenship law. Our Citizenship statutes are clear and specific describing the circumstances under which a person born outside the US acquires citizenship at birth. Under the law in effect at the date of his birth, in order to pass citizenship at birth, his mother needed to have resided in the US for more than a specified number of years of which four needed to be after she had reached the age of 16. Since she was not 20 when he was born, by definition, she could not have met the statutory test.
The statute was amended in 1984 to reduce the after age limit however the modification was specifically effective only as to persons born after November, 1984, and was thus not applicable to Obama.
No argument. He clearly flunks the "citizen when he came down the shute" test.
Further, that is not dispositive of the issue. Even if he had been a citizen when born, that still would not meet the constitutional test.
The "natural born citizen" test was incorporated from an English common law concept of "natural born subject". Point is that when a person is born, they are subject to the law of the sovereign of the place they are born who has the legal power under applicable international law to control what they can do after they are born.
Drafters of our Constitution were unwilling to permit a person to act as chief executive of the US under circumstances where they were technically subject to the rule of a foreign power. Thus the purpose of the "natural born" clause was to require that only those persons subject to the sovereignty of the US from birth would be eligible.
For example, it was generally argued by Constitutional Lawyers in the U S in 1964 that Goldwater was eligible even though he was not born in the territory incorporated in the states of the US because the territory of Arizona was always subject to sovereignty of the U S and was subsequently incorporated into the state. That analysis was never tested and many DC lawyers continued to argue until it was clear that Goldwater would not be elected, that if he were elected, his position would be subject to challenge under the "natural born" test even though Arizona was subsequently included in the Union.
Even if he was born in Hawaii?
However, and here's the point that the liberal defenders of Obama miss, vis-a-vis this NBC interpretation, people who act in a suspicious way bring upon themselves further investigation. the liberals ALWAYS, and I do mean ALWAYS, ignore the present by referring only to the past under the time-honored tradition of “two wrongs make a right.”
For them, it does not matter if Obama did X because Bush did Y, thereby negating X. This is exactly their twisted logic. The reason why we are “picking on Obama” with respect to his eligibility is that he, AND THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY, brought it upon himself by claiming to be open, straightforward, and transparent but whose actions, with respect to his identity, are the most secretive, suspicious, and downright duplicitous behaviors ever exhibited by a Presidential candidate, and now a sitting President, in the history of America.
It's like what happens when a Muslim boards a jetliner prior to takeoff, and then engages in very suspicious behavior. If he's then escorted off the plane by an air marshall, we'll be sure to hear groups like CAIR screaming, “Racial profiling” and “Islamophobia.”
We have a totally different scenario with President Obama because there are dozens of other factors, beyond the NBC issue, that should have kept him from ever being a Presidential candidate, let alone serving as President.
His Presidency was predicated on a mountain of deceit and treachery, the likes of which have never been witnessed - compared to this, Tammany Hall and Boss Tweed look like Mayberry RFD and Barney Fife.
people who act in a suspicious way bring upon themselves further investigation.
Exactly.
Try telling a cop something stupid and see how many more questions you get and how many are repeats having no construct to a logical conversation.
It ain’t the big things that make people question you it/s all those little things that are not consistent with reality or life that cause suspicion.
How’s my tag line?
Divided loyalties appears to be the focus of the founders when requiring a President be a natural born citizen as they understood that term to mean in their day. Hence the need for an honest SCOTUS ruling on the Constitutional term 'natural born citizen'.
The smell of this affirmative action fraud is not quite as bad as that arising from judges and congress critters refusing to uphold their oath to OUR CONSTITUTION because of black community organizing extortion. [I agree with you, Fee, this smacks of cowardice and manipulation by massive business interests.]
I'm guessing the Laforges didn't see anything...
I have a similar theory, but basically what it boils down to is that BHO is a fraud and must be hiding something that would show he is not qualified to be POTUS.
Yes, a fraud, a liar, a Commie and a Traitor.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.