Posted on 05/03/2009 1:56:41 PM PDT by JoeProBono
A UFO was allegedly seen by a number of witnesses hovering above a shopping mall in a satellite town of Moscow in Russia early last month. One lucky witness managed to film the craft with astonishing results. The footage below shows the very clear outline of a disc shaped craft that suddenly vanishes towards the end of the clip.
The sighting took place in the town of Kashira, on the outskirts of Russia's capital city Moscow. The UFO was spotted above the well-known Kisharsky Shopping Mall, leading some local UFO researchers to speculate that it may have been tapping into the Mall's substantial energy system.
UFO sightings and footage have never been more frequent in Russia and many local ufologists believe that aliens will soon be openly revealing their presence on our planet.
Damn, that reminds me of a division manager I once had ;^)
My point *was*, with the increasing sophistication of computer-aided manipulation, both the contents and chain of custody of any such materials will have to be looked at closely.
Perhaps if you know of any shutterbug or video-type FReepers, they'd be in a position to comment.
Hope all is well with you and yours.
g_w
I’ll tell ya what is spooky. The emptiness of that shopping mall. All of that space, looks like halfway nice buildings, and NOBODY around. (I thought OUR malls were hit hard by the poor economy!)
Neat video though. I hope we can hear from some of the other observers.
I stand very corrected.
I’ll TRY harder to amend my ways.
Sorry.
Maybe you can tell the level of my pique at the naysayers that results in such wrong misperceptions. Sigh.
Very sorry.
Sorry for being wrong about him.
I assume the occult stuff was your joke.
Otherwise, that stuff doesn’t stand any better chance with me than the ET’s do.
Oh, I misunderstood you. Hey, as I said in a couple of my early posts on this thread, it’s quite possible that this video is a fake. I’m just working from its aesthetic surface, as it were. I’ll say that, if it’s a fake, it’s a very well done fake. It doesn’t hit you over the head with stuff; it’s subtle. That little one frame appearance of the object as it reappears on the left side of the building could be easily overlooked. But, again, that could be part of the subtlety of a fake, so who knows?
That's the part that fires the "almost too good to be true" neuron in my little brain.
That's the part that fires the "almost too good to be true" neuron in my little brain.
It had occurred to me, as I said. I'd probably rest in the position that either the video is a remarkably fine fake, or else it shows some sort of robotic craft using advanced technology (it's unlikely that biological beings could withstand the acceleration that the craft exhibited without at least being damaged).
A lot of people agree with me, but Quix thinks it’s a real alien. It’s funny, but I don’t feel too devalidated by that!
What does “projection” mean to you? It’s never used in that context.
Thanks for posting.
Cute.
Tooooo funny.
I chucked our TV out years ago.
Didn’t really then feel the need to try so vainly to become a sit down comedy act, though.
I suppose Wiki might have a Reader’s Digest explanation of ‘projection’ for you.
Just what in my post deserved that personal attack?
Go read the Bible a couple of times. You haven’t got it quite figured out yet.
Yes. I quite fail at being
loving ENOUGH.
I repent.
Will seek to do better.
I still don’t like cheap naysayer shots destroying decent dialogue on these threads.
That doesn't strike you as a personal attack?
It's a RELENTLESSLY REPEATED one by naysayers on these threads. It helps shred virtually any possibility of decent dialogue by the more than 150 of us interested in serious dialogue on the topic.
And, imho, it's also grossly hypocritical and ironic in terms of most naysayers.
“cheap naysayer shots destroying decent dialogue”
No, that’s WRONG. It was constructive dialogue that many people agreed with. ONLY you did not.
It was none of “cheap” “naysayer” “shot” or “destroying”.
You either have a very blinkered worldview and an ego that contorts reality to protect itself, or you are purely manipulative. Being the generous sort, I will assume the former. Work on this please. We all have the ability to improve ourselves.
Now please go back, review what I have posted, notice that it has all been reasonable and not in bad spirit, and do not come back with another attack. Perhaps you were carrying arguments with other people into replying to me. I used to do that, back in the day.
The ghost of Matthias Rust?
I mean this well, but honestly, that post is weird.
“And, imho, it’s [”You’re too gullible dude.”] also grossly hypocritical and ironic in terms of most naysayers.”
ooooooookay then.
I pray God’s peace for you. Personal change is an incremental process. It can take many years. It might help to have a picture in your mind of where you want to be in 2 years, in 3 years, not just in your job and finances and relationships, but also in terms of who you are, and the peace of mind you would like to have.
One thing is for certain. If there was a second video from a different perspective, the issue would be settled.
Why is there never two videos? How many videos of 911 were there in comparison?
I certainly tend to lump naysayer sounding posts and naysayer sounding posters
all together.
And that’s a problem and a hazard.
Perhaps you’d be so kind . . . with all your evident mature wisdom . . . not meant satirically . . .
HOW WOULD YOU SUGGEST that I do what I actually can within the limits of my station on such threads
to maximally discourage the thread trashing activities and posts of so many naysayers?
I realize that 100% ignoring would be helpful—does not seem likely given all our personalities—sooner or later some member of the ping list will be hooked enough or irate enough or something enough to respond and we’re off and running.
So, I tend to just dispense with the waiting and formalities and go for it to begin with.
BTW, I don’t see at all what was weird about tossing your accusation of gullibility back at you as an example of your derided “personal attack.”
You deflected the point but didn’t really respond to it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.