My point *was*, with the increasing sophistication of computer-aided manipulation, both the contents and chain of custody of any such materials will have to be looked at closely.
Perhaps if you know of any shutterbug or video-type FReepers, they'd be in a position to comment.
Hope all is well with you and yours.
g_w
Oh, I misunderstood you. Hey, as I said in a couple of my early posts on this thread, it’s quite possible that this video is a fake. I’m just working from its aesthetic surface, as it were. I’ll say that, if it’s a fake, it’s a very well done fake. It doesn’t hit you over the head with stuff; it’s subtle. That little one frame appearance of the object as it reappears on the left side of the building could be easily overlooked. But, again, that could be part of the subtlety of a fake, so who knows?