Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Microsoft Snubs Standards with IE8 — Fails Acid3 Test
ChannelWeb ^ | March 20, 2009 | Ed Moltzen

Posted on 03/22/2009 9:32:50 PM PDT by Swordmaker

Microsoft's Internet Explorer 8 has now been available, downloaded, installed and tested around the world and, so far, the reviews have been OK if not mixed. But a mini-storm could be brewing on the horizon. When IE 8 dropped on Thursday, many in the development community rushed to download it, install it and try it out on the Acid 3 Test, developed by The Web Standards Project. All over the world, the score was turning up the same for almost everyone. Out of a possible score of 100, IE 8 rang up 20. It failed the test and failed it badly.

What's the early reaction to IE8's performance on Acid3? Well, on Twitter, there's this:

Ugh! Activating that ActiveX control did nothing. IE8 is still 20/100 on Acid3. What a waste.

Or this:

Acid3 test FAIL in Internet Explorer 8. Actually crashed the browser.

Or this:

I did the acid3 test on my wife's phone with 2.2 and got 74/100.

Or this:

So IE8 scores 20/100 on the Acid3 test. The next 8 years should be fun trying to work around the usual IE incompatibilities... :/

Is this all just a bunch of developer psychodrama?

Consider this: Developers cast a vote every day for the technology that will ultimately win out in the marketplace - - the technology that can more than most help them to be successful. Standards help them to be successful. And while IE 8 is scoring 20 out of 100 on the Acid 3 standards test, a company down the coast, in Cupertino, Calif., did just a tad better. Apple's Safari 4 browser scores 100 on Acid 3. They also have a little product called the iPhone that uses Safari, that's enjoying some success.

In and of itself, standards compliance for free software like a browser won't determine the king of the marketplace. But Microsoft is losing market share on the desktop, and its desktop business actually shrunk during its most recent quarter. Right now it could use all the friends it can get. And in a community critical to the technology industry, its longtime rival Apple now has a big advantage.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Computers/Internet
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-96 next last
To: Blue Highway
> I’m not a troll, but let me guess you’re an Apple groupie?

Not a bit. Read this if you want the details:

http://www.freerepublic.com/~dayglored/

Specifically the section at the end titled "Computer-tech Full Disclosure Section".

21 posted on 03/22/2009 10:12:05 PM PDT by dayglored (Listen, strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: dayglored
But I think you're being silly saying that complex webpage formatting is not of interest to people surfing the web. Are you stuck in the mid-90's or something?

Not stuck in the mid 90's, but I think all this web 2.0 crap is just that crap. The technology will always improve, but their utilization of said technology isn't very innovative.

22 posted on 03/22/2009 10:13:13 PM PDT by Blue Highway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: the anti-liberal
On the other hand from this article...


Microsoft's newest is big leap for browser

The newest version of Microsoft’s Internet Explorer has major improvements.
By WALTER MOSSBERG
THE WALL STREET JOURNAL
March 22, 2009

The Web browser is arguably the most important piece of software on a computer. No longer just a tool for perusing or searching for information, it has become, for many people, their principal communications medium, their photo album, their newspaper, social club, bank and shopping mall.

And, among Web browsers, by far the most popular is Microsoft's Internet Explorer, or IE, which comes on every new Windows computer. So when Microsoft changes Internet Explorer, those changes affect vast numbers of people, and the Web itself. This week, Microsoft is changing its browser in a major way. On Thursday, the company released IE8, the biggest overhaul of Internet Explorer in years.

I've been testing IE8 for months, first using its prerelease versions and, more recently, the final version. I've found it to be a big improvement over its predecessor, IE7, and a much closer competitor to its main rival, Mozilla's Firefox. IE8 is more stable than IE7, more compatible with industry-wide Web standards, and packed with new features that improve navigation, search, ease of use, privacy and security.

Some of these features can't be matched out of the box by its main rival browsers. For instance, related tabs are color-coded, the search field can show images along with text, you can get instant fly-out maps of place names in Web pages, and you can easily hide your tracks online from the prying eyes of advertisers.

This is an excerpt.

23 posted on 03/22/2009 10:13:18 PM PDT by Swordmaker (Remember, the proper pronunciation of IE is "AAAAIIIIIEEEEEEE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: dayglored

Well glad to see you take a middle of the road approach regarding computers. I am in that boat myself, as I am no big fan of Microsoft or Intel/AMD, but I see and recognize the PC as a standard. The Apple tried to buck the trend and I see them as the black sheep of the family, and there are always those out there that want the runt of the litter. I just find it ridiculous for Apple fanatics to be just that. I am their devil’s advocate.


24 posted on 03/22/2009 10:18:29 PM PDT by Blue Highway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Blue Highway
> Not stuck in the mid 90's, but I think all this web 2.0 crap is just that crap. The technology will always improve, but their utilization of said technology isn't very innovative.

Ok, I'll agree on the last part. OTOH, you said that fancy formatting only mattered to, let's see...

... HTML/XML and CSS and Java graphic designer geeks ...
I submit that it -does- matter to the average viewer, and whether or not they know how it was done is secondary or less. But we need not argue about that, I'm willing to agree to disagree on its relevance, not having any handy statistics to throw around at the moment.
25 posted on 03/22/2009 10:19:01 PM PDT by dayglored (Listen, strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Blue Highway
I think all this web 2.0 crap is just that crap.

I guess you are OK with Microsoft setting their own proprietary standards that results in all other browsers not working properly with web pages designed by MS web design software?

26 posted on 03/22/2009 10:20:43 PM PDT by Swordmaker (Remember, the proper pronunciation of IE is "AAAAIIIIIEEEEEEE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Blue Highway
The Apple tried to buck the trend and I see them as the black sheep of the family

So accepting and using international standards and formats is "bucking the trend," and because they aren't using Microsoft Windows, they are the Black Sheep. Sorry. Why should we lower our standards?

27 posted on 03/22/2009 10:24:18 PM PDT by Swordmaker (Remember, the proper pronunciation of IE is "AAAAIIIIIEEEEEEE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Swordmaker

I will agree with ytou there Swordmaker, Microsoft is the lagging company of browsers, and they do seem to want to be the most non compliant. That I will say I hate, but on the other hand that brings me to how Apple is basically proprietary for the most part and we won’t open that old can of worms here.


28 posted on 03/22/2009 10:24:51 PM PDT by Blue Highway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Swordmaker

He does say that he found it to be slower than Firefox, but it may be that I’m using Win7 and so either Firefox doesn’t run as well, or IE8 runs better.


29 posted on 03/22/2009 10:25:02 PM PDT by the anti-liberal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: the anti-liberal
He does say that he found it to be slower than Firefox, but it may be that I’m using Win7 and so either Firefox doesn’t run as well, or IE8 runs better.

So you are running the beta version?

30 posted on 03/22/2009 10:27:51 PM PDT by Swordmaker (Remember, the proper pronunciation of IE is "AAAAIIIIIEEEEEEE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: the anti-liberal

I’m a recent convert to Firefox 3, since 3.0.5 to the newest 3.0.7. I will say it is a bunch faster than IE7 and IE8. In Windows 7 IE8 does seem quicker than it does under Vista Sp1 or SP2 RC1 or XP SP3. Firefox 3 is also quicker in Win7 and I’d say it is neck and neck with IE8. Only problem is my version of IE8 crashed in Win7 so I have been using FF exclusively until Microsoft offers a stand alone download of IE 8 for Win7 or if there is a way to repair the version I have now that is inoperable.


31 posted on 03/22/2009 10:30:13 PM PDT by Blue Highway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Blue Highway
> Well glad to see you take a middle of the road approach regarding computers. I am in that boat myself,...

Actually I'd characterize myself as "all over the road", since I've got one wheel in each of about 4 lanes simultaneously. But thanks anyway...

> ... as I am no big fan of Microsoft or Intel/AMD, but I see and recognize the PC as a standard. The Apple tried to buck the trend ...

"Buck the trend" vs. "Lead the trend"... Depends on how you read your computer history. Apple was there years before IBM brought out the PC, and has most often been the first out with any given innovation. That's well-documented, I encourage you to research it. While the numbers of computers certainly have been in the PC's favor since the mid-80's, the fact is that most times, Apple brings out something new, and the PC "trend" follows it a year or two later. "Trend-setting" is Apple's stock in trade, not the PC's.

> ... and I see them as the black sheep of the family, and there are always those out there that want the runt of the litter.

That's inaccurate, as a characterization -- be careful, you're showing your hatred of Apple. ;-)

> I just find it ridiculous for Apple fanatics to be just that.

I have no time for Apple fanboys either.

> I am their devil’s advocate.

I think you need to look up the definition of "devil's advocate".

32 posted on 03/22/2009 10:30:59 PM PDT by dayglored (Listen, strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Swordmaker
I'm using build 7057 64bit on my laptop, and I'm very happy with it.

:^)

33 posted on 03/22/2009 10:31:26 PM PDT by the anti-liberal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Blue Highway
> Only problem is my version of IE8 crashed in Win7

I'm pretty sure that MS acknowledges that IE8 does not yet run stably in Win7. I'm sure they'll address that quickly, but I haven't seen it yet.

34 posted on 03/22/2009 10:34:04 PM PDT by dayglored (Listen, strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Blue Highway
If you don't mind my asking, what build of Win7 are you using? That might make a difference. And are you using 64bit Win7, 64bit IE8 (I am)?

Build 7057 includes the release version of IE8, btw.

35 posted on 03/22/2009 10:34:28 PM PDT by the anti-liberal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Blue Highway
> ...on the other hand that brings me to how Apple is basically proprietary for the most part and we won’t open that old can of worms here.

For what it's worth, I don't use Safari unless forced to, just as I don't use IE unless forced to. Firefox runs on my Linux, Windows, and Mac boxes, and I like portability and commonality because it makes me have to fight with it less, my bookmarks file moves from machine to machine without hassle, etc. etc.

36 posted on 03/22/2009 10:38:10 PM PDT by dayglored (Listen, strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Blue Highway
I should also mention that others have found Opera to run better in Win7 than Firefox, and I've found that it runs well too - but there are some Firefox addons that I like that don't run in Opera.

I basic switch between all three, depending on what I'm doing.

37 posted on 03/22/2009 10:42:02 PM PDT by the anti-liberal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: the anti-liberal

‘I basic’ s/b ‘I basically’


38 posted on 03/22/2009 10:42:59 PM PDT by the anti-liberal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Blue Highway; the anti-liberal
> I'm pretty sure that MS acknowledges that IE8 does not yet run stably in Win7. I'm sure they'll address that quickly, but I haven't seen it yet.

Consider this from:

http://www.microsoft.com/windows/Internet-explorer/default.aspx

We’re sorry, but you won’t be able to download Internet Explorer 8 for Windows 7 Beta at this time.

Windows 7 Beta already includes a pre-release candidate version of Internet Explorer 8 that is optimized for that release. Windows 7 enables unique features and functionality in Internet Explorer 8 including Windows Touch and Jump Lists which require additional product tests to ensure we are providing the best Windows experience for our customers.

We will continue to update the version of Internet Explorer 8 running on Windows 7 as the development cycles of Windows 7 progress and plan to include the final version of Internet Explorer 8 in the release candidate version of Windows 7 later this year.


39 posted on 03/22/2009 10:43:59 PM PDT by dayglored (Listen, strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: dayglored
I think you need to look up the definition of "devil's advocate".

In common parlance, a devil's advocate is someone who takes a position, sometimes one he or she disagrees with, for the sake of argument. This process can be used to test the quality of the original argument and identify weaknesses in its structure.

I stand by my earlier statement.

40 posted on 03/22/2009 10:45:01 PM PDT by Blue Highway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-96 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson