Posted on 01/26/2009 7:22:57 AM PST by Sopater
Darwin is dead and his unscientificracist ideas should to be buried also.
Led by the atheistic and misnamed National Center for Science Education and enabled by the main-stream media, colleges, museums, and public schools have launched a last ditch effort to salvage Darwinism.The theme is a yearlong celebration based upon Darwin's 200th birthday on February 12 and the 150th anniversary of the publication of his famous book (see blow) on November 24.
In my state, West VirginiaUniversity has already placed a newspaper add listing events WVU will use to honor Darwin.Revealing consummate hypocrisy is the fact that WVU evolutionist professors are exposed as Debate Dodgers at http://www.lifescienceprize.org/.
Universities and, museums, if public funded, are using tax-payer money to celebrate a man whose ideas have led to the destruction of untold numbers of human lives.What is even more objectionable is that it is a certainty that the public schools, nationwide, will be a focus of this avalanche of propaganda.As a recently retired public school teacher, I find that thought quite disturbing.
For the last five years of my full-time career, with the full knowledge (and dismay) of state and county school officials, as well as the ACLU, I demonstrated to my students that mathematics proves beyond the shadow of doubt that evolutionism is nonsense. The students saw that the evidence clearly shows that every item associated with humans, animals and plants are Intelligent Designs and Intelligent Design is science. I always let the students figure it out for themselves and allowed them to believe what they chose, but at least they were exposed to the scientific facts that extremists want to censor from the minds of public school students.
Few teachers will dare do what I did, especially with today's political situation.Therefore, public school students remain brain-washing subjects for atheists who use cowardly or uninformed educators to propagate their dogma of evolutionism.
Evolutionists use a "bait-and-switch" method of hood-winking gullible children as well as adult products of public schools.Depending on the success of public school brain-washing and the tendency of public school graduates to be too lazy to investigate the facts for themselves, evolutionists mix the term "evolution" with real scientific facts that have nothing to do with the evolution from a particle to a president.
While they put on a good show, behind the scenes evolutionists are scurrying to find a way to explain life without Darwinian references.
Darwinism is all a facade. Darwin's icons (such as the finch beaks) are shams and his disciples want to censor scientific facts about those icons from students.Even the famous Miller-Urey experiment was scientifically debunked years ago.Public school students will not see that in their textbooks or hear that from their teachers.
Public school students are being misled by the imaginative art and wishful thinking of Darwin devotees.A small (25 page) booklet, Biology for the 21st Century (Mastropaolo, 2005.Available from the author at Mastropaolo@surfside.net.) clearly exposes the forgeries and frauds that have accompanied evolutionism throughout history.Bio21C also points out that the exact opposite of evolution is scientific because "billions of people for thousands of years have seen…that all things, viable and nonviable alike, are ravaged by time and that process is found with absolute consistency throughout the universe and is called, devolution." (pg.3)Also, "from trillions of observations by billions of observers for thousands of years, all life forms are fixed…" (pg. 20)In other words, evolution is the exact opposite of reality.
This article began by declaring that Darwin's ideas were racist.The complete title of Darwin's book is On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life. There is ample proof that evil men, following what Darwin believed, have committed atrocities upon humans.Even the liberal Washington Post recently ran an article on this subject (Basest Instinct,January 3, 2009; Page C01.Available on line.)
Amazingly, many Christian (in name) churches are being willingly recruited to align themselves with Unitarians, atheists, and other left-wing true-believers in Saint Darwin.The NCSE knows that one "collar" is worth ten Ph. D.'s in persuading the people in the pews that Darwinism is compatible with biblical beliefs. To counter the propaganda pastors are encouraged to sign the Creation Letter at http://kcsg.wordpress.com/.Also, churches are encouraged to invite speakers from local Creation Science groups and have a Creation Sunday..
To celebrate the life of a theology student (Darwin) in the public schools is equivalent to endorsing an "inverted-fantasy religion taught in the public schools in violation of the First Amendment of the Constitution of the United States of America" (Mastropaolo).
Someone said: "Evolution is bad science, bad thinking, bad logic, and certainly bad theology".Society and public schools would be much better served by celebrating the real scientists such as Louis Pasteur orFrancesco Redi.
Let's dump Darwin's beliefs and leave his memory buried with him in the English churchyard.
Published January 26, 2009
Great information.
bump
bump!!
What I learned from reading this article:
1) That EducationNews.Org is most likely yet another front for the creationist movement.
2) That the author used questionable “mathematics” to “prove” that evolution is impossible - mathematics that he likely doesn’t fully understand himself, and that his students almost certainly don’t. Apparently teaching the scientifically widely accepted theory of evolution is a bad thing, but “proving” that evolution is wrong and thus only design (i.e. creationism) can explain the world using some debatable mathematics is A-OK.
Take the “OMG UR A RACIST” smears to the DUmp where they belong.
Near as I can tell, the biggest single group which does not buy into Darwinism is likely mathematicians and not Christians. Evolution is basically incompatible with modern mathematics and probability theory.
Go back to DC where you belong.
Well, if someone said it, it certainly must be true.
I always get a kick out of it when some joker comes along and claims to have debunked - usually in his spare evenings - one of the most unassailable and comprehensive bodies of scientific work to have developed over the past few centuries. This nutcase seems to differ in that he has apparently made a full-time career our of it.
The article is laughable.
Regards,
OK, my first obseration was incorrect - I suppose I should have followed the link, first. I stand by my second point, however.
“Near as I can tell, the biggest single group which does not buy into Darwinism is likely mathematicians and not Christians.”
I’m guessing you polled a good number of mathematicians to obtain this conclusion?
...because somewhere someone has proven the theory incorrect in a peer-reviewed research article.
Must've missed sucha monumental verdict...
Can you provide a link to mathematics journals to back that assertion up?
This is the internet, where scientific theories developed from thousands of hours of lab and field work and analysis can be disproven from the comfort of your computer chair, with little more than a few google searches and a bit of sophistry.
He makes a lot of assertions, and yet doesn’t actually show in the linked Web page how “mathematics proves beyond the shadow of doubt that evolutionism is nonsense.”
He also seems to be unclear about which aspects of evolution he is trying to refute. Evolution itself (the emergence and spread of new genes in a population) is an observable fact - in the small scale observable in a human lifetime, as anyone who reads about antibiotic-resistant bacteria, or the development of copper-resistant plants around old mines will know.
So is he trying to disprove that speciation doesn’t occur? That the mechanism isn’t Darwininian ‘survival of the fittest’ selection pressure”? Or is he arguing about the origins of life (which is rather different to the evolution of life and should not be conflated).
I suspect that the author is a very good mathematician who is a bit confused about evolutionary biology.
“I demonstrated to my students that mathematics proves beyond the shadow of doubt that evolutionism is nonsense.”
If you go to the link, you'll see the students in question are 7th and 8th graders. It does my old heart good to see that we can do away with universities and the like. Just think of all the money we'll save by having 13 year olds disprove the most robust biological theory in the history of scientific achievement in a 50 minute class.
Must've missed sucha monumental verdict...
What a riot...there's literally no such thing as "peer review" of the cult of evolution because each and every time it's challenged, cultists scream with their hair on fire about religious attacks on science!
I'm sure that many people have disproved the existance of God with similar mathematical rigor.
TEACHING MATERIALS
5. Book Of Pandas and People (Davis and Kenyon. Haughton Publishing. 1993)
It looks like that is the version referring to "design proponents" rather than the earlier "creationist" or the intermediate form "cdesign proponentsists".
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.