Got 'em! Remember these clueless, wastes of space?
1 posted on
01/14/2009 1:35:31 PM PST by
Red Reign
To: Red Reign
Their father, Heath Campbell
What kind of a-hole would name their kid "Heath"?
To: Red Reign
So I know this is kind of an provocative reply...But the goverment can take your kids now for politcaly incorrect reasons?
3 posted on
01/14/2009 1:41:56 PM PST by
Explodo
(Pessimism is simply pattern recognition)
To: Red Reign
from the article:,p> "Part of it is the infantile nature of the parents behavior," Berrill said. "You can name your dog something weird, but they think theyre making some kind of bold statement with the children, not appreciating that the children will have separate lives and will be looked at in a negative light until theyre able to change their name. It is abuse."
what do dweezil and moonunit zappa have to say?
6 posted on
01/14/2009 1:45:32 PM PST by
robomatik
((wine plug: renascentvineyards.com cabernet sauvignon, riesling, and merlot))
To: Red Reign
Looks like Child Protective Services did what Tom Cruise couldn’t do.
7 posted on
01/14/2009 1:46:39 PM PST by
Joe 6-pack
(Que me amat, amet et canem meum)
To: Red Reign
Were they removed because of their names or other circumstances? Some official somewhere along the line had to certify the names submitted on the birth certificate.
This is not a new turn of events, these kids have been around for years.
So what changed?
8 posted on
01/14/2009 1:51:01 PM PST by
weegee
(Beware the Green Menace, the socialists warning you of global warming under your bed are hysteric.)
To: Red Reign
A paper to be published in March in Social Sciences Journal by economists David E. Kalist and Daniel Y. Lee of Shippensburg University found that unpopular first names, when mixed with factors like a disadvantaged home life, can increase the tendency toward juvenile delinquency...
This is crap. I deal with adjudicated juvenile males on a daily basis and none of their problems stem from their names. 99.9% of them have "everyday" names.
While I think the parents were irresponsible for naming their children the names they did, I don't think that's any reason to remove the children from the home.
To: Red Reign
I suspect that this kid will grow up to be another Adfolf Hitler!
15 posted on
01/14/2009 2:09:41 PM PST by
Revolting cat!
(After all is said and done I'm goodier goodier than you!)
To: Red Reign
16 posted on
01/14/2009 2:11:55 PM PST by
Revolting cat!
(After all is said and done I'm goodier goodier than you!)
To: Red Reign
Don't blame the kid!
19 posted on
01/14/2009 2:18:18 PM PST by
Revolting cat!
(After all is said and done I'm goodier goodier than you!)
To: Red Reign
Well, if Mel Brooks is to be believed, Der Fuhrer’s middle name was Elizbeth.
21 posted on
01/14/2009 2:20:39 PM PST by
TBP
To: Vor Lady
If this goes unchallenged, they better start rounding up all the unfortunates named ‘Nevaeh’...Nothing says “My parents are criminally retarded” like that name.
22 posted on
01/14/2009 2:21:19 PM PST by
LongElegantLegs
(Deplore the profligate scattering of corpses!)
30 posted on
01/14/2009 4:21:44 PM PST by
SunkenCiv
(https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/____________________ Profile updated Monday, January 12, 2009)
To: Xenalyte; Gabz
name and nanny state ping
36 posted on
01/15/2009 4:28:09 PM PST by
metmom
(Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson