Skip to comments.
Young 'Adolf Hitler' and Two Sisters Removed From Home
Fox News Web Site ^
| January 14, 2009
| Sara Bonisteel
Posted on 01/14/2009 1:35:31 PM PST by Red Reign
A 3-year-old boy named Adolf Hitler and his two Nazi-named younger sisters were removed from their New Jersey home last week and placed in state custody, police said.
Adolf Hitler Campbell and his sisters, JoyceLynn Aryan Nation Campbell and Honszlynn Hinler Jeannie Campbell, were taken from their Holland Township, N.J., home on Friday by the state's Division of Youth and Family Services (DYFS), Sgt. John Harris of the Holland Township Police Department told FOXNews.com.
Their father, Heath Campbell, is expected in court Thursday in Flemington, N.J., in connection with the case.
(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...
TOPICS: Miscellaneous; Society; Weird Stuff
KEYWORDS: cake; cpswatch; govwatch; hitler; jbt; tennessee; youth
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-36 next last
Got 'em! Remember these clueless, wastes of space?
1
posted on
01/14/2009 1:35:31 PM PST
by
Red Reign
To: Red Reign
Their father, Heath Campbell
What kind of a-hole would name their kid "Heath"?
To: Red Reign
So I know this is kind of an provocative reply...But the goverment can take your kids now for politcaly incorrect reasons?
3
posted on
01/14/2009 1:41:56 PM PST
by
Explodo
(Pessimism is simply pattern recognition)
To: Question Liberal Authority
heath ledger’s parents did.
4
posted on
01/14/2009 1:43:27 PM PST
by
tbw2
(Freeper sci-fi - "Humanity's Edge" - on amazon.com)
To: Explodo
Yea it is kind of ironic that the state is upset because these moron parents named their son Hitler so in response the state marches into their private home like the SS and takes their kids away. Who are the Nazis in this case?
5
posted on
01/14/2009 1:44:27 PM PST
by
TheBigIf
To: Red Reign
from the article:,p> "Part of it is the infantile nature of the parents behavior," Berrill said. "You can name your dog something weird, but they think theyre making some kind of bold statement with the children, not appreciating that the children will have separate lives and will be looked at in a negative light until theyre able to change their name. It is abuse."
what do dweezil and moonunit zappa have to say?
6
posted on
01/14/2009 1:45:32 PM PST
by
robomatik
((wine plug: renascentvineyards.com cabernet sauvignon, riesling, and merlot))
To: Red Reign
Looks like Child Protective Services did what Tom Cruise couldn’t do.
7
posted on
01/14/2009 1:46:39 PM PST
by
Joe 6-pack
(Que me amat, amet et canem meum)
To: Red Reign
Were they removed because of their names or other circumstances? Some official somewhere along the line had to certify the names submitted on the birth certificate.
This is not a new turn of events, these kids have been around for years.
So what changed?
8
posted on
01/14/2009 1:51:01 PM PST
by
weegee
(Beware the Green Menace, the socialists warning you of global warming under your bed are hysteric.)
To: robomatik
And yet Saudi textbooks are used to teach anti-semitism in American schools and no one calls it child abuse.
9
posted on
01/14/2009 1:52:09 PM PST
by
weegee
(Beware the Green Menace, the socialists warning you of global warming under your bed are hysteric.)
To: robomatik
"Part of it is the infantile nature of the parents behavior," All of the Code Pinkos should be losing their children if this were a valid excuse.
10
posted on
01/14/2009 1:53:00 PM PST
by
weegee
(Beware the Green Menace, the socialists warning you of global warming under your bed are hysteric.)
To: TheBigIf
The article mentions that the reason for removal can’t be revealed, due to confidentiality laws. I don’t think they should take the kids just because the parent’s are too stupid to see what impact this could have on them. However, if the state could use this opportunity to knock some sense into the parents, well, then I’d be all for it!
11
posted on
01/14/2009 1:54:53 PM PST
by
Red Reign
(Storm clouds gather. Fear not, it's a Red Reign that's coming.)
To: Red Reign
A paper to be published in March in Social Sciences Journal by economists David E. Kalist and Daniel Y. Lee of Shippensburg University found that unpopular first names, when mixed with factors like a disadvantaged home life, can increase the tendency toward juvenile delinquency...
This is crap. I deal with adjudicated juvenile males on a daily basis and none of their problems stem from their names. 99.9% of them have "everyday" names.
While I think the parents were irresponsible for naming their children the names they did, I don't think that's any reason to remove the children from the home.
To: Red Reign
the name “red reign” might remind some of stalinist russia and it’s crimes against humanity. would you like your children taken away because of your choice of an internet handle? /devil’s advocate. :^)
13
posted on
01/14/2009 2:04:53 PM PST
by
robomatik
((wine plug: renascentvineyards.com cabernet sauvignon, riesling, and merlot))
To: Red Reign
However, if the state could use this opportunity to knock some sense into the parents, well, then Id be all for it!I've been told by liberal Mandarins that I have no sense for being a FReeper.
Should the State come knock some sense into me?
14
posted on
01/14/2009 2:07:55 PM PST
by
Flycatcher
(Strong copy for a strong America)
To: Red Reign
I suspect that this kid will grow up to be another Adfolf Hitler!
15
posted on
01/14/2009 2:09:41 PM PST
by
Revolting cat!
(After all is said and done I'm goodier goodier than you!)
To: Red Reign
16
posted on
01/14/2009 2:11:55 PM PST
by
Revolting cat!
(After all is said and done I'm goodier goodier than you!)
To: Revolting cat!
Adfolf Adolph's uglier, meaner, and smellier older brother.
17
posted on
01/14/2009 2:12:23 PM PST
by
Flycatcher
(Strong copy for a strong America)
To: Revolting cat!
18
posted on
01/14/2009 2:13:51 PM PST
by
Revolting cat!
(After all is said and done I'm goodier goodier than you!)
To: Red Reign
Don't blame the kid!
19
posted on
01/14/2009 2:18:18 PM PST
by
Revolting cat!
(After all is said and done I'm goodier goodier than you!)
To: TheBigIf
Who are the Nazis in this case?Liberals, same as always.
Not much difference in their philosophies.
20
posted on
01/14/2009 2:19:47 PM PST
by
TBP
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-36 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson