To: Red Reign
from the article:,p> "Part of it is the infantile nature of the parents’ behavior," Berrill said. "You can name your dog something weird, but they think they’re making some kind of bold statement with the children, not appreciating that the children will have separate lives and will be looked at in a negative light until they’re able to change their name. It is abuse."
what do dweezil and moonunit zappa have to say?
6 posted on
01/14/2009 1:45:32 PM PST by
robomatik
((wine plug: renascentvineyards.com cabernet sauvignon, riesling, and merlot))
To: robomatik
And yet Saudi textbooks are used to teach anti-semitism in American schools and no one calls it child abuse.
9 posted on
01/14/2009 1:52:09 PM PST by
weegee
(Beware the Green Menace, the socialists warning you of global warming under your bed are hysteric.)
To: robomatik
"Part of it is the infantile nature of the parents’ behavior," All of the Code Pinkos should be losing their children if this were a valid excuse.
10 posted on
01/14/2009 1:53:00 PM PST by
weegee
(Beware the Green Menace, the socialists warning you of global warming under your bed are hysteric.)
To: robomatik
Exactly what I was thinking. If stupid names are a reason to take kids away, then there are a whole lota kids who should be in state custody right now!
23 posted on
01/14/2009 2:26:52 PM PST by
brytlea
(You can fool enough of the people enough of the time.)
To: robomatik
what do dweezil and moonunit zappa have to say?
25 posted on
01/14/2009 2:27:06 PM PST by
TBP
To: robomatik
I hope the state has a better reason than the names. If this stands its certainly a precident.
Stupid parents but govt’s are always worse.
31 posted on
01/14/2009 4:45:14 PM PST by
driftdiver
(I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson