Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Researchers identify new leprosy bacterium
EUREKA ALERT/M. D. Anderson ^ | Nov. 24, 2008 | Scott Merville

Posted on 12/01/2008 2:49:11 PM PST by AuntB

M. D. Anderson scientists use genetic fingerprint to nail 'killing organism'

This release is available in Spanish.

IMAGE: Xiang-Yang Han, M.D., Ph.D., Associate Professor in Laboratory Medicine at The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center.

HOUSTON - A new species of bacterium that causes leprosy has been identified through intensive genetic analysis of a pair of lethal infections, a research team reports in the December issue of the American Journal of Clinical Pathology.

All cases of leprosy, an ancient disease that still maims and kills in the developing world, previously had been thought to be caused by a single species of bacterium, said lead author Xiang-Yang Han, M.D., Ph.D., associate professor in Laboratory Medicine at The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center.

“We have identified a second species of leprosy mycobacterium, and in identifying this killing organism we’ve better defined the disease that it causes, diffuse lepromatous leprosy (DLL).” Han said. DLL occurs mainly in Mexico and the Caribbean.

There are hundreds of thousands of new cases of leprosy worldwide each year, but the disease is rare in the United States, with 100-200 new cases annually, mostly among immigrants. Leprosy initially attacks skin and nerve cells.

R. Geetha Nair, M.D., a physician with Maricopa Integrated Health System in Phoenix, contacted Han in 2007 for help confirming a possible leprosy diagnosis in a patient who died that February.

The patient, a 53-year-old man originally from Mexico, was admitted that month for treatment of extensive leg wounds. While undergoing antibiotic treatment and additional diagnostic testing the next day, he was stricken with high fever and shock. He died after 10 days in intensive care.

Analysis of autopsied tissue at the Phoenix hospital suggested a diagnosis of diffuse lepromatous leprosy, a form first described in Mexico in 1852. Han said DLL uniquely attacks a patient’s skin vasculature, blocking or impeding blood flow. This leads to extensive skin death at late stage and may cause secondary infection and fatal shock. The DLL bacterium had never been studied.[snips]


TOPICS: Health/Medicine
KEYWORDS: aliens; biologicterror; diversity; illegalaliens; immigrantlist; immigration; leprosy; mexico; pestilence
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-36 last
To: SumProVita

“I’m a moral conservative too. ;-)”

Does it get you in as much trouble as it gets me? :-)


21 posted on 12/01/2008 4:44:58 PM PST by Sola Veritas (Trying to speak truth - not always with the best grammar or spelling)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Sola Veritas

Let’s just say it gives me a real challenge with various people...and I love a good challenge.

;-)


22 posted on 12/01/2008 4:50:23 PM PST by SumProVita (Cogito, ergo...Sum Pro Vita. (Modified DeCartes))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: B4Ranch
"Why do you bother with the post if you don’t wish to explain the reasons behind it?"

Because we can post an opinion on FreeRepublic without having to explain it. Explaining an opinion is an option, not a requirement.

If you're not asking for an explanation then the comment doesn't apply to you, so calm down yourself.
23 posted on 12/01/2008 9:45:56 PM PST by gpk9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Sola Veritas; Sherman Logan

Like I said, they’ll never be able to make said bacteria cause leprosy in properly controlled scientific experimentation. Ever.

It being the cause of leprosy and a “killer bacteria” is pure speculation. Pure conjecture. Absolutely no proof whatever, and there never will be.


24 posted on 12/01/2008 9:50:15 PM PST by gpk9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: yefragetuwrabrumuy

Ping.


25 posted on 12/01/2008 10:01:21 PM PST by LucyT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sola Veritas
"Look up and read about “Koch’s Postulates.”"

I know all about Kock's Postulates. One of them states explicitly that a suspected organism must reproduce the illness consistently, over and over again, in properly controlled scientific experimentation.

Said bacteria will NEVER reproduce leprosy in properly controlled scientific experimentation, so it fails Koch's Postulates.

"The “germ” theory of disease has been, using scientific methodology, been proven time and time again in real time."

No, it absolutely has not. The germ theory has NEVER been proven in properly controlled scientific experimentation.

That's WHY it's still a theory. It NEVER has been proven. EVER.
26 posted on 12/01/2008 10:05:51 PM PST by gpk9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: gpk9

“No, it absolutely has not. The germ theory has NEVER been proven in properly controlled scientific experimentation.”

You sound like a member of Mary Baker Eddy’s cult. If you are, just admit it and stop wasting good people’s time with ridiculous assertions.


27 posted on 12/02/2008 7:43:47 AM PST by Sola Veritas (Trying to speak truth - not always with the best grammar or spelling)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Sola Veritas
"You sound like a member of Mary Baker Eddy’s cult. If you are, just admit it and stop wasting good people’s time with ridiculous assertions."

Typical response from medical-brainwashed types. You types have no proof for your beliefs. There is no proof for your beliefs. You've been operating for over 150 years on unproven and unprovable foolish ridiculous theories. You can't give a credible response because you have nothing to give a credible response with, so you resort to attacking the person. I've seen it more times than I can count.
28 posted on 12/02/2008 8:02:14 AM PST by gpk9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: gpk9; All

“Typical response from medical-brainwashed types.”

Yep, you are a Christ-Scientist cultist. I don’t give you a response because it isn’t worth the time. Like I said, leave good people alone.

Oh, and for the record. I don’t have a very high opinion of most in the medical field - but not for your silly reasons.


29 posted on 12/02/2008 8:52:53 AM PST by Sola Veritas (Trying to speak truth - not always with the best grammar or spelling)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: 1_Inch_Group; 2sheep; 2Trievers; 3AngelaD; 3pools; 3rdcanyon; 4Freedom; 4ourprogeny; 7.62 x 51mm; ..

ping


30 posted on 12/02/2008 9:54:47 AM PST by gubamyster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AuntB

Thanks. . .I think.. .


31 posted on 12/02/2008 11:37:33 AM PST by cricket (America's Freedom Rings! Thank You ~ U..S.A. Military~/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gpk9

Dude, they can type bacteria. They can do detailed structural and genetic studies of it. They can identify the actions or toxins that result in the disease symptoms.

If you don’t believe me, go find some Clostridium Tetanii and have at it.

Normally, I fully support freedom of speech no matter how much of a whack job. But your opinions threaten to throw medical technology back 300 years. And YOU - yes YOU YOURSELF - bear the responsibility for the social chaos that might result.

So you should probably put a lid on it. Odds are very high that someone you know or love has been saved in the past by the same technologies you are criticizing hear. In other words, STFU.


32 posted on 12/02/2008 11:42:21 AM PST by djf (...heard about a couple livin in the USA, he said they traded in their baby for a Chevrolet...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Sola Veritas

“If you don’t think bacteria have been definitively linked to disease, then you wouldn’t mind if I injected you with a small amount of Yersia pestis. Then when you develop bubonic or septicemic plague in a week or so, it won’t be my fault.....it just happened.”

Was going to suggest the same thing, except with anthrax or weaponized small pox...


33 posted on 12/02/2008 11:53:02 AM PST by piytar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: piytar

“Was going to suggest the same thing, except with anthrax or weaponized small pox...”

It wouldn’t even need to be weaponized if the person was not already immune. Actually, one of the hemorragic viruses (like ebola) would also do the trick. Chances of someone being immune to them is remote.


34 posted on 12/02/2008 3:06:16 PM PST by Sola Veritas (Trying to speak truth - not always with the best grammar or spelling)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: gubamyster; AuntB

Another pale horse rider from across the southern border bump.


35 posted on 12/02/2008 9:56:18 PM PST by exhaustedmomma (Way to go BARNEY!! Barney for White House Press Secretary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: AuntB
Very interesting. They're calling it Mycobacterium lepromatosis. It's almost M. leprae but not quite. That may explain some of the variability noticed in treatment across infected populations.

I did a little work with the Mycobacteria long ago in my path lab days. It was all fun until some knucklehead - not me - dropped a petri dish of the stuff on the floor. Ever see what an autoclave does to a pair of tennis shoes?

36 posted on 12/02/2008 10:07:30 PM PST by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-36 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson