Posted on 11/17/2008 11:48:17 AM PST by InvisibleChurch
Donovan McNabb's team tied the Cincinnati Bengals yesterday, an outcome which came as a complete surprise to the 10-year NFL veteran:
What did ... I mean ... how can ... wow. That's it, wow. He didn't know that games could end in a tie. You know who knows that games can end in ties? Everyone. Even Tony Siragusa knows that.
(Excerpt) Read more at sports.yahoo.com ...
Not necessarily... say a team has locked up a playoff berth and a first-round bye, and it's the last game of the season. The game doesn't really matter. The coach might withdraw to prevent the possibility of injury to his players or to simply keep them from being too tired.
Another scenario...a team has lost its starting QB to injury. The backup, who's been doing pretty good thus far, gets the a mild injury that he can 'play through' to finish the game. The coach withdraws at the beginning of the second OT rather than take the chance that the QB injures himself worse, at which point he's on his 3rd string QB for the rest of the season.
There's times when it makes sense to punt.
Well at least McNabb won’t run out of the back of the endzone.
Hard to believe McNabb hasn’t heard the old saying “Let’s tie one for the Gipper”.
Then FOX and CBS don’t get their ad revenue if it’s only 20 minutes long. Duh.
:D
Tom Heckert, Jr. would do well to get himself hired by the Lions as a full-authority GM. Let Reid arrange the deck chairs on the Titanic.
No, but we have plenty of high draft pick wide receivers.
You’ll pardon me if I’m a bit sick of them being the best pathetically losing team I’ve ever seen ...
Well, wouldn't they make even more if the game is extended? Not to mention the concessions at the stadium.
The basketball (play a full predetermined time period) method is no good either. Football isn’t usually a high scoring or more importantly quick scoring game like basketball, sudden death is perfectly reasonable. Remember NFL games don’t end in ties often, this is the first time in 6 years, and given how win centered the standing are a tie is as good as a loss. This really hurts Philly in the standings, and if the Bengals weren’t pathetic it would have hurt them too. Which is fine, two teams can’t figure it in 5 quarters they deserve the hit.
I must respectfully disagree. With the money they make, there's no such thing as "too long."
the longer you play, the more tired you are, the more likely it is you get injured.
Fair enough, I'll give you that injuries become more likely.
Were it a playoff game, where a winner MUST be decided, the game will be in play until someone scores. The longest a playoff game has gone on in that fashion has been double overtime.
So, worst case, a game might go into double overtime. Is that "too long" for a professional player to play? I think not.
With a ten-minute overtime, there is no clear advantage to getting the ball first. The team that receives the kickoff might be able to mount a long drive and win the game without ever giving the ball up, but there's also a better-than-even chance that the team kicking off in OT will get the ball LAST.
Whats even worse is when he goes on to question what if a Super Bowl or playoff game ended in a tie.
Maybe they should go to a points system, like hockey, 3 points for a regulation win, 2 points for an OT win, 1 point for an OT loss, and no points for a regulation loss.
apparently it’s the first game in 12,387 to end in that score
; )
They could always do it like in soccer during the FA Cup competition, if it ends in a tie, they replay the match in a few days time, and repeat until one team wins.
I was bummed when it looked like Pittsburgh scored on that final play. But I was happy again when they took the points off and it ended 11-10.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.