Skip to comments.
Bacteria make major evolutionary shift in the lab
New Scientist ^
Posted on 06/10/2008 12:07:34 PM PDT by mnehring
A major evolutionary innovation has unfurled right in front of researchers' eyes. It's the first time evolution has been caught in the act of making such a rare and complex new trait. 
And because the species in question is a bacterium, scientists have been able to replay history to show how this evolutionary novelty grew from the accumulation of unpredictable, chance events.
(Excerpt) Read more at newscientist.com ...
TOPICS: Science
KEYWORDS: 48to46chromosomes; apologistfordarwin; belongsinreligion; crevo; crevolist; evolution; lamarckwasright; notasciencetopic; propellerbeanie; spammer
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
 first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 161-162 next  last
    
1
posted on 
06/10/2008 12:07:35 PM PDT
by 
mnehring
 
To: mnehrling
2
posted on 
06/10/2008 12:09:46 PM PDT
by 
Crazieman
(Vote Juan McAmnesty in 2008!  Because freedom abroad is more important than freedom at home!)
 
To: mnehrling
    Did it change into a hamburger?
 
3
posted on 
06/10/2008 12:12:54 PM PDT
by 
BibChr
("...behold, they have rejected the word of the LORD, so what wisdom is in them?" [Jer. 8:9])
 
To: mnehrling
    But sometime around the 31,500th generation, something dramatic happened in just one of the populations  the bacteria suddenly acquired the ability to metabolise citrate, a second nutrient in their culture medium that E. coli normally cannot use. Cool!
 
4
posted on 
06/10/2008 12:14:39 PM PDT
by 
trumandogz
("He is erratic. He is hotheaded. He loses his temper and it worries me." Sen Cochran on McCain)
 
To: Crazieman
    Micro-changes to DNA over millions of years = the 2% genetic and 6% genomic difference between humans and chimps = “macro” evolutionary change.
 Pretty simple really.
 
5
posted on 
06/10/2008 12:14:40 PM PDT
by 
allmendream
(Life begins at the moment of contraception.  ;))
 
To: mnehrling
    I’ve suspected as much...
 
6
posted on 
06/10/2008 12:15:53 PM PDT
by 
allmost
 
To: BibChr
    > Did it change into a hamburger?
No, it developed a taste for orange juice.
 
To: allmendream
    Micro-changes to DNA over millions of years = the 2% genetic and 6% genomic difference between humans and chimps = macro evolutionary change. Nonsense! The flat earth which sits right in the middle of the universe is only 5,678 years old.
 
8
posted on 
06/10/2008 12:18:24 PM PDT
by 
trumandogz
("He is erratic. He is hotheaded. He loses his temper and it worries me." Sen Cochran on McCain)
 
To: mnehrling
    Paging Michelangelo...
 Paging Michelangelo...
 "Sir - Your going to have to replace the guy on the left with one of these...

 
9
posted on 
06/10/2008 12:19:25 PM PDT
by 
shineon
 
To: trumandogz
10
posted on 
06/10/2008 12:20:56 PM PDT
by 
Crazieman
(Vote Juan McAmnesty in 2008!  Because freedom abroad is more important than freedom at home!)
 
To: shineon
    Not exactly. To paraphrase C.S. Lewis: Science teaches us HOW God created the world, the Bible teaches us WHY.
11
posted on 
06/10/2008 12:21:12 PM PDT
by 
mnehring
 
To: Crazieman
    Good one.
It’s in the Church of Darwin Argument Clinic Handbook, page 8913275328975481432513275815409243010243285.
“When browbeating, threats and ridicule don’t work, go to the flat earth!”
 
12
posted on 
06/10/2008 12:25:51 PM PDT
by 
BibChr
("...behold, they have rejected the word of the LORD, so what wisdom is in them?" [Jer. 8:9])
 
To: mnehrling
    Incomplete; but then, Biblical exegesis wasn’t Lewis’ strong point. Perhaps more like, “The Bible teaches us to what end God created the universe in six normal days.”
 
13
posted on 
06/10/2008 12:27:26 PM PDT
by 
BibChr
("...behold, they have rejected the word of the LORD, so what wisdom is in them?" [Jer. 8:9])
 
To: BibChr
    six normal days Except, the Bible doesn't say six 'normal' days, it uses the term Yom which can translate as a 12 hour day, 24 hour day, or an 'age' of indeterminate amount of time (such as "in the Day of the Lord" that is often used.)
 
14
posted on 
06/10/2008 12:31:27 PM PDT
by 
mnehring
 
To: BibChr
    Are you saying the Bible is infallible, and that Creation happened in exactly 6 days because the Bible says so?
 
15
posted on 
06/10/2008 12:31:27 PM PDT
by 
PugetSoundSoldier
(Indignation over the sting of truth is the defense of the indefensible)
 
To: mnehrling
    It's the first time evolution has been caught in the act of making such a rare and complex new trait.  Odd. I've been told many times on this board that macroevolution has been observed many times in the lab. But according to this article, this was a First.
 And because the species in question is a bacterium ...
 Oh. Singular. I see. We're still talking about one species so I guess this isn't macroevolution.
 
16
posted on 
06/10/2008 12:31:27 PM PDT
by 
ClearCase_guy
(Et si omnes ego non)
 
To: mnehrling
    The Bible also teaches us how behave, how to live, how to love, how to give, how to forgive, how to ask forgiveness, how to find our way home, how to raise our children, how to pray, who to bind our allegiance to...
The Bible does tell us How God created the world. He spoke it into existence through Jesus Christ - the Word.
For by Him was everything made that was made.
Every time God said, “Let there be...” and there was.
If that’s not specific enough for you, then you and C.S. Lewis are right, the Bible does not teach us How.
 
17
posted on 
06/10/2008 12:31:59 PM PDT
by 
shineon
 
To: ClearCase_guy
    Odd. I've been told many times on this board that macroevolution has been observed many times in the lab. But according to this article, this was a First. No, you need to re-read the entry. Take the words literally. It is the first time we have seen evolution making a new and rare trait. That does not mean it is the first example of evolution within the lab, but the first time for this new and rare trait, much more of a complex jump than typically witnessed.
 
18
posted on 
06/10/2008 12:33:29 PM PDT
by 
PugetSoundSoldier
(Indignation over the sting of truth is the defense of the indefensible)
 
To: BibChr
    Here's all the proof I need that the earth is indeed as flat as this picture. : )
 
19
posted on 
06/10/2008 12:34:03 PM PDT
by 
shineon
 
To: shineon
    On the other hand. Here's proof that Pancakes are not flat. 
 
20
posted on 
06/10/2008 12:36:24 PM PDT
by 
shineon
 
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
 first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 161-162 next  last
    Disclaimer:
    Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
    posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
    management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
    exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson