Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Electric Space Weather Baffles Scientists
Thunderbolts.org ^ | 11/19/2007 | Michael Goodspeed

Posted on 11/20/2007 3:36:08 PM PST by Swordmaker

 


Excess electron density over North America in 2003. Credit: Anthea Coster & John Foster MIT.



Nov 19
, 2007
Electric Space Weather Baffles Scientists

Atmospheric researchers are puzzled by a "newly discovered form of space weather" observed over the African continent.

"...We've seen the smoke, but where's the smoke stack?"

This "strange" and "new" phenomenon is the "ion plume" -- a form of electrified "gas" (plasma) in Earth's atmosphere that is so high above ground it makes contact with space itself. (See NASA -- Strange Space Weather Over Africa)

Scientists are taking the discovery quite seriously. In Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, over 100 scientists and students have converged this week to discuss the ion plume and its profound ramifications for many scientific disciplines.

The electric plumes were first discovered a few years ago over North America, when one appeared during a geomagnetic storm and noticeably affected GPS signals. According to NASA, this was a "plume of excess electron density." The plumes form in Earth's ionosphere, reaching upward into space, for reasons that have mystified atmospheric scientists. For answers, investigators are turning toward Earth's magnetic equator, which passes along the sub-Sahara.

The Earth's ionosphere is an outer region of the atmosphere that contains a high concentration of free electrons. Since scientists have observed electrical properties of the ionosphere for more than 100 years, why should they find the plumes' discovery "strange?" Answer: The plumes behavior indicates something that scientists have resisted for many decades -- that the Earth itself is a charged body moving in a plasma medium, and interacting electrically with its plasma environment. In the electric view of the Solar System, the Sun becomes a central player in the electrodynamics of planetary behavior. And exchanges between the Sun and Earth can be seen as the answer to numerous mysteries that have accumulated over decades.

This common disregard for electricity has a long history. More than 100 years ago, one of the electrical pioneers, Kristian Birkeland, proposed that the auroras were part of an electrical exchange between Earth and the Sun. But by the middle of the 20th century, traditional dogma in astronomy had virtually precluded that possibility. Then, a few decades later, our satellites detected UNDENIABLE streams of charged particles from the Sun entering Earth's upper atmosphere to provoke the auroras. Until that point, it had been blindly asserted that Earth's magnetosphere must be an impenetrable envelope, "squeezed" by the solar wind, to induce auroral activity.

Now it is known that electrical events occur when clouds of charged particles -- Coronal Mass Ejections (CME) -- erupt from the Sun. If the eruption is intense and Earth is in the path of these charged particles, the result will be a proton storm, with potential serious disruptions of communications on Earth. And this arrival of protons provokes a response from the ionosphere in the form of electron concentrations (plumes) rising into space. In other words, it is an electrical TRANSACTION -- a CURRENT -- connecting the "negative" earth and the positively charged Sun at the center of the Solar System. (For background on the electric Sun, click here)

Investigators compare the ion plumes to "smoke billowing out of a factory smokestack," but this analogy is quite misleading. Electrified plasma is not akin to smoke at all. The plumes do not float up and then dissipate like smoke from a chimney. In gravitational terms, the escape velocity from Earth is 25,000 MPH -- not a plausible achievement by a charge-neutral gas like smoke. But charged particles barely notice gravity, if at all. The vastly more powerful electric force rules them.

The researchers do recognize the electrified nature of the "gas" (plasma), but are very careful in their choice of words. In fact, the investigators do not offer any explanation for what they are seeing. In an electrically neutral Solar System, no explanation exists, because within this framework, electrical transactions across cosmic distances are inconceivable! What occurred when they first observed the ion plume is this: "…an explosion on the sun had hurled a cloud of magnetized gas -- a CME -- toward Earth. The plume formed when the CME hit, triggering a strong geomagnetic storm. The plume consists of ionized air at high altitude moving from Florida to Canada at a speed of 1 km/s (2200 mph)."

It must be emphasized that the mechanical principles of atmospheric circulation will never account for this anomalous transport at such velocities. But in electrical terms, charged particles are not restricted by standard gas kinetics. And in fact, in plasma discharge phenomena we frequently see charged particles accelerated to near light speed.

Another science story on the "mysterious plumes" indicates that they may seriously disturb air travel, obviously increasing the stakes for investigators who don't understand how or why the plumes form. The New Scientist news service reports: "Mysterious plumes of plasma at the edge of the Earth's atmosphere are threatening airline navigation by throwing off GPS positioning information by up to the length of a football field. But a poor understanding of how the plumes form means that accurate forecasts of the phenomena -- which would allow GPS users to plan around them -- are years away.

"...at least some of the disruptions are due to giant plumes of charged particles, or plasma, that form in response to the solar outbursts in the Earth's ionosphere, a region filled with ions at the boundary between Earth's atmosphere and outer space. The concentrated plasma in the plumes diverts and delays satellite communications, such as GPS signals."

We see here a profound illustration of the potential human cost of ignorance. And this ignorance amounts to little more than the momentum of historic dogma, which has excluded electricity from space. To put these new findings in perspective, it is only necessary to see Earth as proponents of the Electric Universe see it. The electrical theorists recognize the Earth as a self-repairing, "leaky" capacitor (a capacitor is a device for accumulating and storing electric charge.) A capacitor is made of two conductors separated by an insulating medium. When charge is placed on one conductor, it attracts charge of the opposite polarity on the other conductor. As a result, an electric field is set up between the conductors, a reservoir of electrical energy. Applied to Earth, this means that the atmosphere serves as the insulating layer between two conductive regions – the solid Earth is the negatively charged region, and the external environment of Earth is the more positively charged region. And the electrical activity of the Sun affects the balance between the two regions. Of course, Earth's atmosphere is not a perfect insulator, and leakage will occur, particularly in response to disturbances from the arrival of "proton storms."

Sadly, scientists investigating the "mysterious" plumes seem unaware that across many disciplines, similarly "surprising" discoveries in our Solar System reveal the same underlying pattern. From the energetic outbursts of comets, to the electric plumes of the Jovian moon Io, to towering, electrified "dust devils" on Mars, to explosive jets from Saturn's icy moon Enceladus, we see planets, moons, and comets interacting electrically with their plasma environments. No interpretation of these "anomalies" will work that does not include the recognition of a few basic facts:

1) The earth, like all of the planets, is a charged body.

2) The Sun has an electric field, and it interacts electrically with the planets.

3) The Sun is not powered by some mysterious, internal "nuclear furnace", but rather externally by electric currents flowing along the arms of the Milky Way.

4) 99.9% of the universe consists of PLASMA, a nearly perfect conducting medium that has been found to exhibit strong electrical properties, almost always ignored by astronomers. All of space is teeming with charged particles.

We live in an electrically dynamic universe, a reality confirmed almost daily by "surprising" and "mysterious" discoveries such as the electric "ion plumes" over Earth.



TOPICS: Astronomy; Science
KEYWORDS: catastrophism
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

1 posted on 11/20/2007 3:36:09 PM PST by Swordmaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: AndrewC; commonguymd; Eaker; Fractal Trader; Fred Nerks; jeddavis; LeGrande; Lokibob; ...
Astronomers puzzled again when confronted with electrical phenomena in Space... PING!

If you want on or off the Electric Universe Ping List, Freepmail me.

2 posted on 11/20/2007 3:37:29 PM PST by Swordmaker (Remember, the proper pronunciation of IE is "AAAAIIIIIEEEEEEE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Swordmaker

Has to be a side effect of Global Warming!


3 posted on 11/20/2007 3:43:23 PM PST by doorgunner69
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Swordmaker

“3) The Sun is not powered by some mysterious, internal “nuclear furnace”, but rather externally by electric currents flowing along the arms of the Milky Way.”

*************

*opens up physics book*

Uhhhhhhh.


4 posted on 11/20/2007 4:00:30 PM PST by Hunterite
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Swordmaker

1) The earth, like all of the planets, is a charged body.

2) The Sun has an electric field, and it interacts electrically with the planets.

3) The Sun is not powered by some mysterious, internal “nuclear furnace”, but rather externally by electric currents flowing along the arms of the Milky Way.


The net charge on each planet, and the sun, is zero.
The electric field is neutral, but the magnetic field crosses the entire solar system. Charged particles move along magnetic flux lines, some are positive and some are negative and they sum to zero.
What powers the sun is still assumed to be nuclear fusion which may be so but may not be the whole explanation, and what forms the various planetary magnetic fields is an assumed dynamo effect from the core, but that does not hold up.


5 posted on 11/20/2007 4:06:00 PM PST by RightWhale (anti-razors are pro-life)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Swordmaker
Sounds like an astronomer obsessed with Nikola Tesla.
Makes for a good theory on how UFOs can travel through space.


6 posted on 11/20/2007 5:06:09 PM PST by darkwing104 (Let's get dangerous)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Swordmaker
the Earth as a self-repairing,

The nut shell

Someone please let Gore know that the icecaps of Mars are melting at a much faster rate than earths = I'll contribute to a one way ticket...

7 posted on 11/20/2007 5:19:59 PM PST by maine-iac7 (",,,but you can't fool all of the people all the time" LINCOLN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
The electric field is neutral, but the magnetic field crosses the entire solar system. Charged particles move along magnetic flux lines, some are positive and some are negative and they sum to zero.

"Sum up to zero..." or so the astronomers claim... but they have no proof.

"Charged particles move along magnetic flux lines..." Are you absolutely certain of that? Or are the charges separated into charge separated double layers... as we see can form in all plasmas we work with on Earth and that are scalable? Perhaps the magnetic flux lines are there because there are charged particles moving?

What creates your magnetic flux lines? Are they just "there" or are they the artifacts of moving electrons... as are all magnetic fields?

"What powers the sun is still assumed to be nuclear fusion ... " A fusion powered sun does not explain how you get from a 6000º surface to a multimillion degree upper atmosphere by "convection".

"...but that does not hold up..." That's the problem.

8 posted on 11/20/2007 5:53:39 PM PST by Swordmaker (Remember, the proper pronunciation of IE is "AAAAIIIIIEEEEEEE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Hunterite
*opens up physics book*

I've read the physics books, too.... I used to tutor in Physics. (several decades ago). What we have are theories of what powers the sun. One of the serious problems of a Fusion powered sun is where are the Neutrinos? To account for the lack of a sufficient number of neutrinos the latest tweak of the theory is that two thirds of them change into something else before they reach very far... like to the Earth. Why is the solar surface FAR cooler than the solar atmosphere? Why do we see what to all extents and purposes objects on the sun that are identical to birkeland currents we see in plasma laboratories here on Earth... electrical currents of separated charges in plasma sheaths. The one great failure of modern cosmology is in its ability to PREDICT what we will find... while the electrical theorists have made prediction after prediction that have been found to be correct. The proof of a theory is in its ability to make predictions based on that theory... if you can't you throw it out and start over.

9 posted on 11/20/2007 6:00:49 PM PST by Swordmaker (Remember, the proper pronunciation of IE is "AAAAIIIIIEEEEEEE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Swordmaker

“What powers the sun is still assumed to be nuclear fusion ... “ A fusion powered sun does not explain how you get from a 6000º surface to a multimillion degree upper atmosphere by “convection”.

****************

All the scopes see is increased temperature on surface, which means released energy. A telescope see’s released energy (photons). A radio scope sees released energy (electromagnetic waves). When you look at the sun you are see’ing released energy, not the energy itself.

http://www.sasked.gov.sk.ca/docs/physics/u4b2phy.html

LATENT HEAT:

“The specific latent heat of fusion is the quantity of heat energy released when 1 kg of a substance solidifies (i.e. fuses) without changing its temperature. (liquid to solid)

The specific latent heat of vaporization is the quantity of heat energy needed to vaporize 1 kg of a substance without changing its temperature.” (liquid to gas)

I would imagine that the hydrogen plasma on the surface of the sun would release energy similar to Latent Heat of liquid to gas, or solid to liquid. I don’t know much about plasma. Its the fourth state of matter.


10 posted on 11/20/2007 6:02:54 PM PST by Hunterite
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Hunterite

OH! I just thought of a good one. STEAM from a pot of boiling water, both at exactly the same temperature, releases energy faster then the boiling water itself (scalds you more).

EH EH EH EH!

?


11 posted on 11/20/2007 6:10:23 PM PST by Hunterite
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Hunterite

OR!

In the corona the electrons from the hydrogen atoms are seperated by greater distances (plasma), so when the electron (and then a miracle happens) jumps back closer to the nucleus it releases a higher energy photon.

C’mon, how complicated can it get, were dealing with just hydrogen.


12 posted on 11/20/2007 6:14:34 PM PST by Hunterite
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Swordmaker

It’s Uranus.


13 posted on 11/20/2007 6:17:54 PM PST by toddlintown (Five bullets and Lennon goes down. Yet not one hit Yoko. Discuss.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hunterite

Re: just Hydrogen

Any element can form a plasma... just get it hot or charged enough.

Electrons in a plasma are disassociated from the nucleus and can be thought of as free electrons, easily moved through the plasma which is what makes a plasma a good conductor.


14 posted on 11/20/2007 6:47:23 PM PST by Swordmaker (Remember, the proper pronunciation of IE is "AAAAIIIIIEEEEEEE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Swordmaker; 75thOVI; AFPhys; Alice in Wonderland; AndrewC; aristotleman; Avoiding_Sulla; ...
Thanks Swordmaker.
 
Catastrophism
 
· join · view topics · view or post blog · bookmark · post new topic ·
 

15 posted on 11/20/2007 7:25:50 PM PST by SunkenCiv (Profile updated Sunday, November 18, 2007"'"'"'"'"'"'"'"'"'"'https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hunterite

Re: Steam and water at the same temperature.

Your thesis that you will be burnt worse from the steam than the water shows you haven’t stuck your hand boiling water. There is more mass carrying the energy in the water, ergo more energy. The steam has far lower mass. Think about getting hit by white hot sparks from a sparkler as opposed to grabbing the sparkler itself. That will get you third degree burns... The spark won’t burn you.


16 posted on 11/20/2007 7:49:07 PM PST by Swordmaker (Remember, the proper pronunciation of IE is "AAAAIIIIIEEEEEEE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Swordmaker

bmflr

.

.

Why the smart money is on Duncan Hunter
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1926032/posts
Posted on 11/15/2007 3:43:17 AM PST by Kevmo


17 posted on 11/20/2007 7:51:14 PM PST by Kevmo (We should withdraw from Iraq — via Tehran. And Duncan Hunter is just the man to get that job done.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kevmo

Is intrade.com a scam?


18 posted on 11/20/2007 7:58:06 PM PST by Hunterite
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Hunterite

Intrade is a prediction market. One thing prediction markets are better at — their only bias is whether someone can make money trading the futures contracts. They have proven to be better indicators than polls.

The Efficacy Of Prediction Markets The Liberty Papers ^ | November 8, 2007 | Brad Warbiany
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1922961/posts

Posted on 11/08/2007 12:21:43 PM PST by E. Pluribus Unum


19 posted on 11/20/2007 7:59:46 PM PST by Kevmo (We should withdraw from Iraq — via Tehran. And Duncan Hunter is just the man to get that job done.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

Comment #20 Removed by Moderator


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson