Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Drudge Flash: The soil on Mars may contain microbial life!
DrudgeReport ^ | 8/23/07 | Drudge

Posted on 08/23/2007 9:20:12 AM PDT by LibWhacker

The soil on Mars may contain microbial life!

Joop Houtkooper of the University of Giessen, Germany, will declare on Friday the Viking spacecraft may have found signs of a weird life form based on hydrogen peroxide on the subfreezing, arid Martian surface.

His analysis of one of the experiments carried out by the Viking spacecraft suggests that 0.1 percent of the Martian soil could be of biological origin.

That is roughly comparable to biomass levels found in some Antarctic permafrost, home to a range of hardy bacteria and lichen.

Developing....


TOPICS: Astronomy; Science
KEYWORDS: abiogenesis; creation; crevolist; evolution; gilbertlevin; hydrogen; hydrogenperoxide; labeledrelease; life; loadofbologna; mars; microbial; peroxide; savethehype4sunday; soil
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-94 last
To: razzle

Oh, my, I didn’t mean to post that. Wrong screen. Please ignore everyone.


81 posted on 08/23/2007 1:12:03 PM PDT by Greg F (Duncan Hunter is the conservative in the race.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: MarkL

82 posted on 08/23/2007 1:20:15 PM PDT by CJ Wolf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: CJ Wolf

Is that a Viking Kitty?


83 posted on 08/23/2007 1:27:16 PM PDT by Kevmo (We should withdraw from Iraq — via Tehran. And Duncan Hunter is just the man to get that job done.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: Kevmo

It is the mars rover bunny.


84 posted on 08/23/2007 1:30:57 PM PDT by CJ Wolf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: Kevmo

Oh good pun! BTW.

More info on it here.

http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1071395/posts?q=1&;page=1#1


85 posted on 08/23/2007 1:36:38 PM PDT by CJ Wolf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: Mikey_1962
The fact that I can find more life in a teaspoon of pond scum than NASA has found in 50 years of exploring space says something about how special the Earth is.

Or just how big space is...

Space is big. Really big. You just won't believe how vastly, hugely, mind- bogglingly big it is. I mean, you may think it's a long way down the road to the chemist's, but that's just peanuts to space.

Mark

86 posted on 08/23/2007 2:08:29 PM PDT by MarkL (Listen, Strange women lyin' in ponds distributin' swords is no basis for a system of government)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: razzle
There is no life on Mars or anywhere else. We are alone, get used to it “scientists”.

And your source of information is????

87 posted on 08/23/2007 6:10:44 PM PDT by Coyoteman (Religious belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker
The problem is that given the three-day wild guess idea of how to find life on Mars with the Viking lander's soil sampler when it was designed in the late 1960's, it's almost impossible to determine what we got from that mission is indicative of life on the planet. I'll wait until the results from the Mars Phoenix lander arrives in Fall 2008, where we have a vastly more modern soil sampler that can better determine the soil chemical composition to see if microbial life still exists on the planet.
88 posted on 08/23/2007 9:45:14 PM PDT by RayChuang88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Coyoteman

His own thoughts, since he has his head so far in the sand.


89 posted on 08/23/2007 10:01:08 PM PDT by AntiKev ("No damage. The world's still turning isn't it?" - Stereo Goes Stellar - Blow Me A Holloway)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
Could be. Could also be old news. What we ought to wonder about is that Mars has no magnetic field of any consequence yet Mars rock has preferred magnetism directions as if Mars had a magnetic field once as it had an atmosphere once. If planetary magnetism is due to the core as is claimed for earth, where did Mars’ magnetic field go? We can discuss Jupiter and the sun.

Mars has a larger surface to volume ratio due to its smaller radius which allowed it to cool down faster after accretion. It is estimated that the magnetic field of Mars lasted about half a billion years. Then the solar wind was able to strip the atmosphere and oceans (it was deflected before).

A good question is what caused the planetary magnetic field on Venus to fail. Venus is comparable to the Earth in surface to volume ratio so it is surprising that it doesn't have a similar magnetic field. The lack of a magnetic field (which in our case is produced by a dynamo in the Earth's core) implies that the core of Venus is all liquid with no convection or even perhaps that the core is all solid.

I note the Venus problem because while the standard explanations for the magnetic fields of Earth and Mars discuss surface to volume ratios, there are more variables that must be discussed. The Earth has a strong convection cycle in which it transports heat to the surface (which is observed by plate tectonics). Some would argue that Mars has some evidence of early plate motion which indicates some convection occurred. No plate motion is visible on Venus which may indicate that no convection is occurring or has occurred. Perhaps the high surface temperature makes the temperature gradient too shallow to support a strong convection cycle.

90 posted on 08/24/2007 12:59:59 AM PDT by burzum (None shall see me, though my battlecry may give me away -Minsc)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: neodad
“Well, then it’s a big waste of space, isn’t it?”

No, you can look for space aliens in Kansas for all I care. Regarding “Outer Space”, or the Universe, there are no space aliens out there either but its not a “waste” since we can explore, colonize and do other things that honor our Creator.

91 posted on 08/24/2007 5:14:12 AM PDT by razzle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: Coyoteman
“And your source of information is????”

SETI, common sense (and “The Privileged Planet” if you care to read it).

92 posted on 08/24/2007 5:16:42 AM PDT by razzle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: MarkL
Amen to that.
93 posted on 08/24/2007 10:51:48 AM PDT by Boxen (If we can hit that bull's-eye, the rest of the dominoes will fall like a house of cards...Checkmate!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

So if you could increase the mass of the planet, you could increase the atmosphere.

1) We could steer comets into Mars, that would increase the mass, provide more water, and heat up the planet some from the impacts.

2) It’s either that or we feed Mars candy, since everyone knows 1 lb of candy causes a 5lb weight gain.

3) Or we use the Massmaximizer 5000 on the planet.


94 posted on 06/26/2008 6:41:31 PM PDT by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-94 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson