Skip to comments.
Mexico threatens Arizona over anti-illegals measure
WND ^
| Jan 28, 2005
| staff
Posted on 01/27/2005 11:00:51 PM PST by ETERNAL WARMING
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-59 next last
To: ETERNAL WARMING
I think it's time American Taxpaying Citizens declared war on Mexico since our government won't do it. How about a taxpayer class action suit to recoup our tax money?
2
posted on
01/27/2005 11:02:07 PM PST
by
ETERNAL WARMING
(We have the best politicians corporate money can buy)
To: ETERNAL WARMING
International courts have NO jurisdiction over our affairs in my humble opinion! Are we, as a sovereign nation, going to permit an international court to dictate our internal affairs? When did the state of Arizona relinquish this right to the federal government as the 10th Amendment requires?
3
posted on
01/27/2005 11:18:27 PM PST
by
Rabble
(Is the 10th Amendment in the Bill of Rights, Still in Force?)
Why has this been moved to General/Chat?
4
posted on
01/27/2005 11:25:28 PM PST
by
ETERNAL WARMING
(We have the best politicians corporate money can buy)
To: ETERNAL WARMING
To avoid discussion about the subject.
5
posted on
01/27/2005 11:30:58 PM PST
by
B4Ranch
(Don't remain seated until this ride comes to a full and complete stop! We're going the wrong way!)
To: gubamyster
6
posted on
01/27/2005 11:38:35 PM PST
by
ETERNAL WARMING
(We have the best politicians corporate money can buy)
To: 1_Inch_Group; 2sheep; 2Trievers; 3AngelaD; 4.1O dana super trac pak; 4Freedom; 4ourprogeny; ...
To: B4Ranch; ETERNAL WARMING
To avoid discussion about the subject. And it appears to have worked.
8
posted on
01/27/2005 11:51:37 PM PST
by
Mr. Mojo
To: gubamyster
9
posted on
01/27/2005 11:53:47 PM PST
by
backhoe
(-30-)
To: Rabble
"International courts have NO jurisdiction over our affairs in my humble opinion! Are we, as a sovereign nation, going to permit an international court to dictate our internal affairs? When did the state of Arizona relinquish this right to the federal government as the 10th Amendment requires?"
They will go to the Hugue because Mexico has had success with the UN courts ruling in their favor in similar cases. However Washington should be viewed powerless to intervene under the authority of the individual states.
http://newsmax.com/archives/articles/2004/3/31/151227.shtml
10
posted on
01/28/2005 12:11:46 AM PST
by
seastay
To: gubamyster; JohnHuang2; keri; international american; Kay Soze; jpsb; hershey; TomInNJ; ...
ALL RIGHT YOU FEELTHY GRINGOS - YOU'RE ALL GOING TO A DETENTION HOLDING CAMP IN A (FORMER) US NATIONAL FOREST - ping.
=====================================================
We (the Mexican government) are seeking all the legal opportunities that exist, first using the legal capacities of the United States itself and ... if that does not work, bringing it to international tribunals," AP quotes (Mexico's Foreign Secretary)Derbez as saying.
* * *
11
posted on
01/28/2005 12:16:04 AM PST
by
Happy2BMe
("Islam fears democracy worse than anything If the imams can't control it - they will kill it.)
To: B4Ranch
why?
Is the subject matter embarassing to folks around here?
12
posted on
01/28/2005 12:17:33 AM PST
by
recalcitrant
(who stole the cork off my lunch?)
To: Happy2BMe
13
posted on
01/28/2005 12:19:20 AM PST
by
Pro-Bush
(John has a long mustache.)
To: seastay
However Washington should be viewed powerless to intervene under the authority of the individual states.
The problem with ARizona is that most of those in power are the open borders crowd. They fought this Prop with everything they had. I can't invision them intervening in support.
14
posted on
01/28/2005 12:23:53 AM PST
by
ETERNAL WARMING
(We have the best politicians corporate money can buy)
To: ETERNAL WARMING
15
posted on
01/28/2005 12:42:45 AM PST
by
FBD
("A nation without borders is not a nation." -- Ronald Reagan)
To: B4Ranch; Marine Inspector
Time to build a concrete "fence" on our border. Keep 'em from getting here to collect the bennies in the first place.
This is the type of concrete fence (below) that Homeland Security recommends for protecting water reservoirs, etc. It's an incredibly fast type of construction, and it can't be cut like a chain link fence.
www.concretefence.com/pages/homelandsecurity
If it's good enough for protecting our water supplies, it ought to be good enough for our border!
Click on this link (below), it's animated, and shows how the panels install:
http://www.concretefence.com/pages/specs.htm
16
posted on
01/28/2005 12:56:03 AM PST
by
FBD
("A nation without borders is not a nation." -- Ronald Reagan)
To: gubamyster
17
posted on
01/28/2005 1:20:46 AM PST
by
lainde
To: recalcitrant
Extremely so. The subject brings in deserved criticism of the President.
18
posted on
01/28/2005 4:37:21 AM PST
by
B4Ranch
(Don't remain seated until this ride comes to a full and complete stop! We're going the wrong way!)
To: backhoe
I personally want a DMZ of at least 100 miles that I will also use as my private deer hunting reserve, a twofer in my book, third world out, deer hunting in.
19
posted on
01/28/2005 4:53:07 AM PST
by
junta
(If you must hate, hate an ideologue.)
To: ETERNAL WARMING
Translation: "WE HAVE A RIGHT TO INVADE YOUR COUNTRY AND MAKE YOUR CITIZENS PAY FOR IT!"
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-59 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson