Skip to comments.
Martian UFO?
www.coasttocoastam.com ^
| Sol 033
| JPL Spirit Navigation Camera
Posted on 02/08/2004 10:18:22 AM PST by Momaw Nadon
TOPICS: Astronomy; Astronomy Picture of the Day; Conspiracy; Science; UFO's; Weird Stuff
KEYWORDS: alien; aliens; artbell; bell; coasttocoastam; dustonimage; flyingsaucer; georgenoory; jpl; mars; martian; noory; pixel; rover; saucer; space; spirit; ufo; ufos
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120, 121-140 last
To: potlatch; thoughtomator; Quix; ntnychik; autoresponder
It's the Raelians !!
A claim of human cloning? It's been done before - Raelians '78 announcement was ruled a fraud
|
|
|
|
Posted by MeeknMing On 01/01/2003 5:47 AM CST
The Washington Post ^ | January 1, 2003 | The Washington Post Staff A claim of human cloning? It's been done before '78 announcement was ruled a fraud; new case awaiting validation 01/01/2003 The Washington Post For all the speed with which science was progressing, virtually no one thought it would happen so soon. Yet there it was in huge block letters on the front page of the New York Post: The world's first human clone had been born. The next day, The Washington Post and other newspapers across the country ran with the story about the rogue scientists who had cloned a human on an undisclosed island. A spokesman connected to... |
121
posted on
02/09/2004 2:18:18 AM PST
by
MeekOneGOP
(Check out this HILARIOUS story !! haha!: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1060580/posts)
To: TomB
These things happen.
Good Morning.
122
posted on
02/09/2004 6:26:53 AM PST
by
Frank_Discussion
(May the wings of Liberty never lose a feather!)
To: thoughtomator
Most likely a speck of dust in the air. But it's great for the tinfoil industry.
Any speck of dust capable of being supported by Martian air for a long enough time to take an unblurred shot would have to be mighty tiny. As far as it being a speck of dust on the lens, it should then show up in previous or succeeding shots.
123
posted on
02/09/2004 7:06:59 AM PST
by
aruanan
To: Momaw Nadon
I wonder if they have a State Department . . . .
124
posted on
02/09/2004 9:30:04 AM PST
by
TiaS
To: aruanan
We solved the puzzle above... it's a dead pixel in the camera.
125
posted on
02/09/2004 10:42:31 AM PST
by
thoughtomator
("What do I know? I'm just the President." - George W. Bush, Superbowl XXXVIII halftime statement)
To: thoughtomator
We solved the puzzle above... it's a dead pixel in the camera.
Good. Same as speck of dust stuck to the lens: shows up in same place in various shots.
126
posted on
02/09/2004 10:54:07 AM PST
by
aruanan
To: Momaw Nadon
127
posted on
02/09/2004 1:43:25 PM PST
by
Hoboken
To: Lawgvr1955
LOL, I'll have to look out for that commercial!!
128
posted on
02/09/2004 8:07:26 PM PST
by
potlatch
(Whenever I feel 'blue', I start breathing again.)
To: MeekOneGOP
Another good one, Meek!!
129
posted on
02/09/2004 8:11:00 PM PST
by
potlatch
(Whenever I feel 'blue', I start breathing again.)
To: potlatch
Why, thank ya, ma'am ! ...
130
posted on
02/10/2004 5:58:52 AM PST
by
MeekOneGOP
(Check out this HILARIOUS story !! haha!: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1060580/posts)
To: tricky_k_1972; KevinDavis
131
posted on
12/30/2005 5:17:09 PM PST
by
SunkenCiv
("In silence, and at night, the Conscience feels that life should soar to nobler ends than Power.")
To: ALASKA; ActionNewsBill; airborne; albertp; andysandmikesmom; areafiftyone; aruanan; ...
132
posted on
12/31/2005 8:57:30 AM PST
by
KevinDavis
(http://www.cafepress.com/spacefuture)
To: KevinDavis
133
posted on
12/31/2005 9:37:35 AM PST
by
My2Cents
(Dead people voting is the closest the Democrats come to believing in eternal life.)
To: Quix
Just for the heck of it:
What are type I and type II errors?
134
posted on
12/31/2005 10:00:26 AM PST
by
norton
To: Momaw Nadon
Most importantly, where are the frames preceeding and following this frame? That would tell the story!
135
posted on
12/31/2005 10:23:41 AM PST
by
i_dont_chat
(Bush lied, people dyed. Their fingers. [Stolen from Mark Steyn].)
To: thoughtomator
Effective sarcasm, ineffective illustration:
"So, here we have a number of possible explanations:"
1) Speck of dust in the air
my photography experience is limited but a speck of dust wouldn't even register on any lens I've ever used. Too close it's a blur, too far away it's too small, and 'just right' would leave the rest of the image totaly out of focus.
2) Data error or transmission error
It's not like we'd seen previous reports of random dropped pixels.
If they had been a problem we'd at least have seen one or two out of the large number of images avalable to us. (This alternative requires either a very, very, rare random event, or first sign of 'new' system degeneration. The latter might be a possibility but either would require repetition.)
3) Phobos, Deimos, or another trapped asteroid
As someone else noted, NASA knows where these bodies are at the time the photo was shot; there are then three alternatives, [a] NASA ignored a historic phorto because NASA does not need or want positive PR, [b] NASA is preparing a huge PR release to tell us about it right after the Rose Bowl game, [c] NASA doesn't know any better than we know what it is.
(which seems the most simple to you?)
4) Alien vehicle
Much like alternative number 2 - can't be proven or disproven as yet.
136
posted on
12/31/2005 10:44:27 AM PST
by
norton
To: norton
Changed my mind.
Going back to the original photo, with the landing mechanism directly in front of the rover. My second alternative goes away - so how many similar errors have been noted during all of our reporting on the little guys?
137
posted on
12/31/2005 10:46:38 AM PST
by
norton
To: KevinDavis
Noticed the original post was back in February. I haven't heard anything about his photo. Must have been explained in some way.
138
posted on
12/31/2005 10:50:14 AM PST
by
manwiththehands
(My wish for the new year: I wish Republicans were running the country.)
To: Quix
139
posted on
12/31/2005 12:00:02 PM PST
by
Marie
(Support the Troops. Slap a hippy.)
To: Quix
140
posted on
01/01/2006 3:56:42 PM PST
by
airborne
(If being a Christian was a crime, would there be enough evidence to convict you?)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120, 121-140 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson