Click here: to donate by Credit Card
Or here: to donate by PayPal
Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794
Thank you very much and God bless you.
Posted on 07/17/2025 5:12:13 PM PDT by CaptainK
It was Jeffrey Epstein’s 50th birthday, and Ghislaine Maxwell was preparing a special gift to mark the occasion. She turned to Epstein’s family and friends. One of them was Donald Trump. Maxwell collected letters from Trump and dozens of Epstein’s other associates for a 2003 birthday album, according to documents reviewed by The Wall Street Journal.
(Excerpt) Read more at wsj.com ...
|
|
Click here: to donate by Credit Card Or here: to donate by PayPal Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794 Thank you very much and God bless you. |
lol, yeah sure. Walls closing in!!! Dream on, loser.
The WSJ won’t produce the card.
Impeach!
“Epstein was 50 in 2003, 21 years ago. Was Epstein even taking flights to “Epstein’s Island” then?”
Epstein purchased the island in 1998.
It’s a fake.
Sorry, WSJ. You’re gonna lose this one.
Not Trump’s style.....
“consuming the Trump administration”
I very much doubt that.
I cut the cable in 2016 mainly because of Faux News Primary debate in September 2015 where Trump was AMBUSHED by Kelly, Baier and Wallace and then subsequent debates in which their chosen boy Little Marco NEVER was asked a question on illegal immigration in any of the other debates.
The Murdochs own Faux News and the WSJ and they would like to take Trump down as much as CNN or PMSNBC.
I don’t think this story accounts for much other than the latent TDS that has always been under the surface with the Murdochs.
It was latent because they made billions pretending to well meaning folk loyal to Trump but didn’t have the ability to discern the Murdochs and their entities would do anything they could do bring Trump down.
This story is proof of that.
I cut the cable in 2016 mainly because of Faux News Primary debate in September 2015 where Trump was AMBUSHED by Kelly, Baier and Wallace and then subsequent debates in which their chosen boy Little Marco NEVER was asked a question on illegal immigration in any of the other debates.
The Murdochs own Faux News and the WSJ and they would like to take Trump down as much as CNN or PMSNBC.
I don’t think this story accounts for much other than the latent TDS that has always been under the surface with the Murdochs.
It was latent because they made billions pretending to well meaning folk loyal to Trump but didn’t have the ability to discern the Murdochs and their entities would do anything they could do bring Trump down.
This story is proof of that.
Trump being Trump I would say Bill Clinton leaked out dirt on himself through his lawyers in the 1990’s deliberately to water down any sting in the legal process.
Media will report on this for the next month. It’s gasoline on the Epstein file debacle fire. Pam Sessions really made a mess of the Epstein issue with her headline seeking.
It’s all about the midterms.
Remember, it’s never about the issue. It’s always about the revolution.
Calling Buckhead...
Content Reported from the Letter (paraphrased from major outlets):
“Donald: We share certain similarities, Jeffrey.”
“Jeffrey: Indeed, we do, upon reflection.”
“Donald: Mysteries never grow old, have you noticed?”
“Jeffrey: I certainly did the last time we met.”
“Trump: A friend is a remarkable gift. Happy Birthday — may each day hold another delightful secret.”
UberWealrthy guys in NYC all knew each other. No surprise DJT sent brthday card. Epstein pprobably sent him one too. And a lot of other straight-up guys.
...and now you are being sued for being stupid, WSJ.
Ohhhhh……
Somebody catch my while I faint.
Another totally obvious hoax...sue away Donald! Goodbye WSJ!
All they had to do was fake a signature (which indeed looks fake) on a note someone else sent.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.