Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Biden Spox Discloses New Information on Joe Biden’s Last Test for Prostate Cancer After Trump Questions Why Diagnosis Wasn’t Revealed Earlier… and CNN Isn’t Even Buying It
Gateway Pundit ^ | May 20, 2025 | Cristina Laila

Posted on 05/20/2025 8:07:33 PM PDT by Macho MAGA Man

On Tuesday a Biden spokesperson claimed Joe Biden’s last underwent a Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) blood test, a common way to detect prostate cancer, back in 2014.

“President Biden’s last known PSA was in 2014. Prior to Friday, President Biden had never been diagnosed with prostate cancer,” a Biden spox said on Tuesday afternoon.

Even CNN isn’t buying it.

“He was President of the United States and didn’t get tested? I find this very surprising,” a CNN anchor said in disbelief.

(Excerpt) Read more at thegatewaypundit.com ...


TOPICS: Conspiracy; Health/Medicine; Local News; Politics
KEYWORDS: alexthompson; autopen; cancer; certainlynotnews; clintonnonnews; cnn; coverup; cristinalaila; dementia; gatewaypundit; hunterbiden; jaketapper; jillbiden; joebiden; originalsin; pages; prostatecancer; psa
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 next last
To: Macho MAGA Man

BTTT


21 posted on 05/20/2025 11:43:27 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: for-q-clinton

Wrong. I’ve had prostate cancer. I went through hormone treatments and radiation treatments both high and low dose radiation therapy. That was in 2016. The cancer was early stage and I get PSA tests every 6 months. I’m 73. My doctor and I want to know WTF is up?


22 posted on 05/20/2025 11:52:32 PM PDT by Equine1952 (I)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: for-q-clinton

Huh?


23 posted on 05/21/2025 12:01:52 AM PDT by nikos1121
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: for-q-clinton; Equine1952
> Don’t need a test after you already tested positive.

Ummm, no. Like Equine1952 I'm 73. About 6 years ago my PSA started rising, and it exceed the threshold of concern (4.0) a couple years ago. It rose to 7, which was worrisome, and most references consider that a "positive", but it went back down to 4 six months after that and hasn't exceeded 5 since then.

Fortunately the digital exams are still showing no irregularities. But if the PSA gets back up to 6 or more I'll be scheduling a biopsy (not looking forward to that).

I also have a condition called MGUS which is a pre-myeloma cancer marker, so I've gotta watch out for all that too. sigh.

I don't buy the "ignore prostate cancer after 70, something else will kill you first". My mom lived to 99, that's 26 years more than I am now. I'd like to give her a run for it.

24 posted on 05/21/2025 12:16:11 AM PDT by dayglored (This is the day which the LORD hath made; we will rejoice and be glad in it. Psalms 118:24)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: dayglored

I hope your PSA level stays low and your other worry’s disappear. The biopsy is a bitch but you’ve been through bad stuff at 73, so you’ll grit your teeth and handle it, if necessary. We all do. There are a multitude of treatments available for prostate cancer if caught early. I’ve been in the nuclear industry since my 20’s so radiation didn’t scare me, I chose it. A friend had his prostate removed. We both took about 3 months to recover. Doing radiation you have to go to treatment everyday for 5 days a week. You sleep at home every night for the time it lasts. Get it removed your in the hospital for 3-5 days and spend the next 3 months healing up. I chose my way. My friend did his. We both still get PSA tests every 6 months. Take care and be well. Regards.


25 posted on 05/21/2025 12:41:02 AM PDT by Equine1952 (I)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Macho MAGA Man

Total BS. Its a $22 line item in a complete blood profile. And, the only people who stop getting tested after an age limit are persons who have insurance that won’t pay and no ability to pay the $22.


26 posted on 05/21/2025 12:47:04 AM PDT by anton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Equine1952

True. But the point I’m making is he never got a test from his gov’t doctors. If he was getting treated for it...it would have been on the side and never mentioned. Or the gov’t doctor just lied and said he didn’t do it.

My point is they knew it would show something so they didn’t officially do the test.


27 posted on 05/21/2025 2:20:59 AM PDT by for-q-clinton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: dayglored

See my comment above...they don’t need an OFFICIAL test that they make public.


28 posted on 05/21/2025 2:21:44 AM PDT by for-q-clinton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Macho MAGA Man

They lie.

No man over 55 does not get a prostate blood work test

And it is cheap.


29 posted on 05/21/2025 2:35:47 AM PDT by Chickensoup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
The real crime is that Obama, Hillary and Valerie Jarrett were running the country by autopen. It was a coup.

Yup. The Mockingbirds just can't stop with the lies and misdirection.

30 posted on 05/21/2025 2:38:37 AM PDT by Sirius Lee ("Never argue with a fool, onlookers may not be able to tell the difference.”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: mountainfolk

You are correct.

Biden was run because he was obviously compromised. Just like the trans issue and the black violence issue and the trashed cities issue and the poor student outcomes issue we are supposed to ignore and shut up.

That Marxist Soviet web has been wrapped tightly around the country.

Looks like it is beginning to break.


31 posted on 05/21/2025 2:41:33 AM PDT by Chickensoup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Macho MAGA Man

They did the testing, they just never reported the results. Deniability.


32 posted on 05/21/2025 3:17:01 AM PDT by hinckley buzzard ( Resist the narrative. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bruce Campbells Chin

Notice the weasel words: “last known” test was in 2014.


33 posted on 05/21/2025 3:19:24 AM PDT by hinckley buzzard ( Resist the narrative. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Owen

The issue really is not what’s “allowed”, it’s what the insurance will pay for. I wanted to get more PSA tests than my insurance “allowed”, and had Lab Corp. do them on my own. They cost 50 bucks each, including a doctor’s prescription. They didn’t even ask what my age was.


34 posted on 05/21/2025 3:44:57 AM PDT by norwaypinesavage (Freud: projection is a defense mechanism of those struggling with inferiority complexes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Macho MAGA Man

It’s apparent that there is so much misinformation in this GP article and comments that it’s hard to know where to start. This was touched on the other day in post 28 of this discussion “Morning Joe: ‘Very Troubling’ If Biden Doctor Found Elevated PSA But Didn’t Inform Public”. https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/4317880/posts

Folks need to acquaint themselves with what a PSA test is, what it is good for and what it does not do. Go and research the genesis of the PSA test in 1986 when Dr. Thomas Stamey of Stanford developed the it… then read Dr. Stamey’s 2004 paper where he updated his findings with the conclusion that the results of the PSA test were not related to prostate cancer but elevated readings were related to Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH).

I’m not interested in debating this issue with anyone and I’m not presenting the above as an oncologist….all I’m suggesting here is that folks need to do their own research into this issue.....and while the PSA test has some benefit, you will likely be sadly enlightened if you think that it was any kind of be all and end all indicator of prostate cancer. There is a ton of medical research that goes back to the findings of Dr. Stamey and his colleagues (and much since then) that can be accessed with a simple search… if you don’t agree with the above synopsis, go and argue with those findings and medical papers. All this entire episode with Brib’em has shown is just how difficult it is to stop a train of misinformation once it has had decades of being ingrained into the public perception.


35 posted on 05/21/2025 3:52:49 AM PDT by hecticskeptic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Macho MAGA Man

I have a psa run every year...and I’m not even a politician...


36 posted on 05/21/2025 3:58:56 AM PDT by joe fonebone (And the people said NO!! The end.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Macho MAGA Man

He had the DUMBEST DOCTOR EVER !


37 posted on 05/21/2025 4:13:27 AM PDT by Ann Archy (Abortion.....the HUMAN Sacrifice to the god of Convenience..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bigbob

Really is looking like Bidens 4 years were nothing but Bullshit.


38 posted on 05/21/2025 4:43:25 AM PDT by Jolla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Macho MAGA Man

Did they provide a reading of PSA values?


39 posted on 05/21/2025 4:46:18 AM PDT by ADSUM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Macho MAGA Man

clearly with this stage of cancer, his routine blood panel (forget PSA) would be a mess.....


40 posted on 05/21/2025 5:10:21 AM PDT by GotMojo ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson