ransomnote wrote: “Death. They really failed to print DEATH on the side of the box and that ‘adverse event’ is not common for almost all presecribed or over the counter medicine.”
DugwayDuke wrote: Death following vaccination isn’t proof that the vaccination caused the death. Anti-vaxxers are happy to mention a death caused by a motor cycle rider as being claimed to have been caused by COVID.
ransomnote wrote: If motorcycle deaths accounted for 86% of all deaths attributed to Covid, there'd be something of a reaction from the public. No, you can't explain away the fact that 86% of all deaths are reported post-Covid19 vaccine, in a government vaccine database active for over 30 years.
ransomnote wrote: “Here That’s just the tip of the iceberg -only about 1% of adverse events following vaccination are ever reported.”
DugwayDuke wrote: The law requires that all deaths following vaccination, regardless of cause, be reported to VARES. It’s not at all surprising that minor adverse effects like sore arms, etc., are not always reported. It’s absurd to use this data to project that untold deaths are not reported.
ransomnote wrote: That law was never enforced. The medical regime does not enforce laws against itself. How convenient you claim that minor adverse events like sore arms are not reported. When people die, they are unlikely to report that as an adverse event.
When medical staff are threatened or punished, they don't report to VAERS. The CDC/FDA went one step further and made a paper form, awkward and extensive, for doctors to fill out.
WelcomeTheEagle (youtube) documented his attempts to file an adverse events report to VAERS for his father's illness- the program logs you off without warning at the 20 minute mark and you have to start over from the beginning, typing as fast as you can, to get a report in. If you can submit a report, online or on paper, it goes to the CDC to 'review' for 4 - 6 weeks and sometimes is never seen again. There were records deleted from VAERS involving death (documented by WelcomeTheEagle and posted by me on FR).
Your kind likes to pretend doctors were not censored, threatened, punished, but the public knows it happened.
There is V-Safe, the vaccine database distributed to those receiving the vax, the results of which are not available to the public for review. The CDC pushed the public to put the V-safe on their phones and use it to report adverse events instead of using VAERS. In this way, the CDC found away to avoid getting some deaths or other severe illnesses (blindness, paralysis, neurological damage) reported to VAERS. There are 800,000 of these reports in the V-Safe production, as of Nov. 4, 2022 there are 30,492 V-Safe reports in VAERS, so around 770,000 reports of adverse events are not available to the public to review.
We'll see how the whistleblower lawsuit regarding CMS goes; so far it looks like 40,000 deaths post C-19 vax which were supposed to flow from the CMS database into VAERS were never uploaded. There are at least 12 databases that feed VAERS post-vax data.
ransomnote wrote: “Naomi Wolf is functioning as a mouthpeice for a group of researchers combing through the Pfizer trial data, finding ghastly results for pregnancies (lose) and other obvious harm that somehow never made it into the black box warnings”
DugwayDuke wrote: The average miscarriage rate among pregnant women receiving any COVID-19 vaccines was 9%. The risk of miscarriage among the COVID-19 vaccinated group, compared with the unvaccinated group, showed no significant difference in miscarriage rate between the two groups. In addition, both groups exhibited similar rates of ongoing pregnancies or live birth.
- https://www.news-medical.net/news/20230219/Can-COVID-19-vaccinations-cause-miscarriage-in-pregnant-women.aspx
ransomnote wrote: As usual, you cite a biased source. Medical-Net is verified as trustworthy by a leftist rating system; NewsGuard.
STUDY: NewsGuard Ratings System Heavily Skews in Favor of Left-Wing Outlets
In fact, NewsGuard was so biased that James Cormer and others investigated it, in these excerpt by Rebecca Falconer's article in Axios:
- Comer wrote to NewsGuard's co-CEOs and co-editors-in-chief, Steven Brill and Gordon Crovitz, on Thursday seeking documents as part of its investigation into whether the company's actions have "in any way" been "sponsored by a federal, state, local, or foreign government."
- These include "NewsGuard's business relationships with government entities, its adherence to its own policies intended to guard against appearances of bias" and "how it tries to avoid and manage potential conflicts of interest arising from its investors and other influences," per the letter to the veteran news executives.
- "A primary concern for the Committee is the Department of Defense contract NewsGuard was awarded in 2021, which raises questions about the involvement of federal agencies in potential censorship campaigns," Comer wrote."
What they're saying: Crovitz said in a statement to media the company looked forward "to clarifying the misunderstanding by the committee" about its work for the Defense Department. - "Our work for the Pentagon has been solely related to hostile disinformation efforts by Russian, Chinese and Iranian government-linked operations targeting Americans and our allies," added the former Wall Street Journal publisher.
https://www.axios.com/2024/06/14/newsguard-oversight-committee-investigation-free-speech
I'm not at all surprised you rely on corrupt sources; I've come to expect it from you. Checking VAERS, those receiving a Covid19 vaccine account for 3 times the number of still births as other types of vaccines. (Again, tip of the iceberg numbers)
| COVID-19 | 190 | 56.72% |
| Tetanus | 64 | 19.1% |
| Pertussis | 63 | 18.81% |
| Diphtheria | 63 | 18.81% |
| Influenza | 59 | 17.61% |
Here's an excerpt from Naomi Wolf regarding the research performed on the PFizer trial results exposed:
| Crime of the Century?-Naomi Wolf delivers the harrowing facts about the Pfizer jab | ||
11/22/2024 7:57:56 AM PST · by SJackson · 74 replies Frontpagemagazine ^ | November 22, 2024 | Bruce Bawe | ||
Meanwhile, over 54% of the pregnant women who were exposed to the vaccine had adverse effects; 19% of babies exposed via breast milk had adverse effects; and 23% of vaccinated mothers’ fetuses or newborns died. “In one section of the documents,” we read, “over 80 percent of the pregnancies followed resulted in miscarriage or spontaneous abortion.” And yet, according to The Pfizer Papers one Pfizer document reported, beyond all logic, “that mRNA in breast milk was safe.”
The crucial point here is that not only did the Pfizer shot imperil fetuses, babies, and their mothers – Pfizer and the FDA knew it. For whatever reason, however, they made an “aggressive effort” to inject pregnant women anyway, with CDC director Rachel Walensky explicitly urging at a White House briefing that pregnant women get the jab. Burkhardt’s recommendation was diametrically opposed to Walensky’s: “If I were a woman in fertile age, I would not plan a motherhood from a person, from a man, who has been vaccinated….Stop this vaccination at once.”
ransomnote wrote “Except now, the studies are slowly starting to roll in:”
DugwayDuke wrote: It’s been known for a long period of time that the study you referenced was withdrawn because it’s conclusions were not supported by the study methodology. That study was performed by multiple persons well known for presenting misleading and often false data about the vaccines. The study was again presented to another journal, the Forensic Science International, which subsequently withdrew the paper against the wishes of the authors. After concerns were raised about the paper, including “inappropriate” citations and design methodology; “[e]rrors, misrepresentation, and lack of factual support for the conclusions”; along with “[f]ailure to recognise and cite disconfirming evidence,” the authors submitted a revised manuscript. According to the removal notice, “peer-reviewers concluded that the revised manuscript did not sufficiently address the concerns raised by the community and that it was not suitable for publication in the journal.” Yet anti-vaxxers continue to cite that debunked study.
ransomnote wrote: You are citing another fake news source, of course. This fake news source makes more money if it shuts down criticism of the vax (censorship).
| University That Funds Biden's Think Tank And Hosts FactCheck.Org Has Contract With BioNTech, Gets Paid For Vaccine Sales And FDA Approvals | ||
02/09/2022 9:33:36 AM PST · by Golden Eagle · 14 replies The National File ^ | Feb 6, 2022 | Patrick Howley | ||
| EXPOSED: Facebook’s Independent COVID Fact-checker Site FactCheck.org Funded By $1.9 Billion Vaccine Lobby | ||
10/15/2021 11:06:38 PM PDT · by ransomnote · 25 replies greatgameindia.com ^ | April 28, 2021 | greatgameindia.com | ||
ransomnote wrote: “There are too many to list. How about the 2 to 3 month duration before starting to vaccinate people, when vaccines used to be tested for years. No one knows the long-term effects of the Covid19 vax, yet.”
DugwayDuke wrote: The trials are well documented. One should differentiate between concerns about the speed of the process and the actual safety and efficacy data of the vaccine itself. The vaccine has been widely administered and generally found to be safe and effective in preventing severe COVID-19.
ransomnote wrote: Oh they are well documented - so much so that Pfizer fought in court to conceal trial results from the public for 75 years. Pfizer lost the case and researchers dug through the horrible trial results, and Naomi WOlf composed them into reports with expert assistance, and posted them online and eventually in her book:
| Crime of the Century?-Naomi Wolf delivers the harrowing facts about the Pfizer jab | ||
11/22/2024 7:57:56 AM PST · by SJackson · 74 replies Frontpagemagazine ^ | November 22, 2024 | Bruce Bawer | ||
You can't explain or refute the data proving that your CDC talking points are false. In fact, when I post tables from VAERS or articles dhowing the harm caused by the vax, you pretend you didn't see it, it doesn't exist.
CATASTROPHE: 20% of Human Test Subjects Severely Injured from Gates-Fauci Coronavirus Vaccine by Moderna
fort-russ.com ^ | May 20, 2020 | Robert F. Kennedy Jr.
Posted on 5/20/2020, 7:56:12 PM by ransomnote
Oh sure, the CDC and FDA/NIH are all saying it's just a coincidence, but around 86% of the deaths reported to VAERS after vaccination just happen to be for the Covid19 'vaccines'.
| COVID-19 | 42,659 | 86.06% |
| Diphtheria | 3,531 | 7.12% |
| Pertussis | 3,433 | 6.93% |
| Polio | 3,402 | 6.86% |
| Tetanus | 3,262 | 6.58% |
| Haemophilus | 3,001 | 6.05% |
| Pneumonia | 2,872 | 5.79% |
| Influenza | 2,706 | 5.46% |
| Hepatitis B | 2,454 | 4.95% |
| Rotavirus | 1,051 | 2.12% |
| HPV | 687 | 1.39% |
| Measles | 578 | 1.17% |
| Shingles | 555 | 1.12% |
| Mumps | 543 | 1.1% |
| Rubella | 539 | 1.09% |
Even the censorship and 'narrative' pushing media are sheepishly admitting that, well, yes, the "Moderna and Pfizer/BioNTech vaccines are linked in rare cases to myocarditis and pericarditis, conditions involving inflammation of the heart muscle and lining." Only, these conditions are not in fact, "rare".
Periocarditis Reported After Vaccination:
| COVID-19 | 12,296 | 97.35% |
| Influenza | 220 | 1.74% |
| Smallpox | 206 | 1.63% |
| Hepatitis B | 63 | 0.5% |
| Anthrax | 61 | 0.48% |
| Shingles | 56 | 0.44% |
| Tetanus | 47 | 0.37% |
| Diphtheria | 46 | 0.36% |
| Meningitis | 41 | 0.32% |
| Typhoid | 39 | 0.31% |
| HPV | 39 | 0.31% |
| Pneumonia | 32 | 0.25% |
| Pertussis | 29 | 0.23% |
| Hepatitis A | 28 | 0.22% |
| Rubella | 20 | 0.16% |
| Polio | 20 | 0.16% |
Myocarditis
| COVID-19 | 18,281 | 98.45% |
| Smallpox | 215 | 1.16% |
| Influenza | 187 | 1.01% |
| Diphtheria | 110 | 0.59% |
| Tetanus | 106 | 0.57% |
| Pertussis | 93 | 0.5% |
| Hepatitis B | 85 | 0.46% |
| Polio | 65 | 0.35% |
| Pneumonia | 62 | 0.33% |
| Anthrax | 60 | 0.32% |
| Haemophilus | 44 | 0.24% |
| Meningitis | 42 | 0.23% |
| HPV | 41 | 0.22% |
| Hepatitis A | 36 | 0.19% |
| Mumps | 35 | 0.19% |
| Rubella | 34 | 0.18% |
Blood clots - many ways to identify the problems reported for Covid vax regarding blood clots. I'll try a few ways. Here's the first.
Add 'Brain Stem' to the chart because I couldn't get it in view.
And here's the search results for those diagnoses cover 30+ years of reports to VAERS.
| COVID-19 | 1,735,076 | 65% |
| Influenza | 237,610 | 8.9% |
| Diphtheria | 222,240 | 8.33% |
| Tetanus | 217,438 | 8.15% |
| Pertussis | 197,643 | 7.4% |
| Pneumonia | 159,693 | 5.98% |
| Shingles | 133,088 | 4.99% |
| Polio | 123,527 | 4.63% |
| Rubella | 117,016 | 4.38% |
| Measles | 116,985 | 4.38% |
| Mumps | 116,193 | 4.35% |
| Hepatitis B | 113,468 | 4.25% |
| Varicella | 110,461 | 4.14% |
| Haemophilus | 98,107 | 3.68% |
| HPV | 81,165 | 3.04% |
| Meningitis | 54,173 | 2.03% |
| Hepatitis A | 53,694 | 2.01% |
ransomnote wrote: Biden's medical regime would have you believe these carditis reports are just serendipity at work because they never studied any cause and effect. So, by their reasoning, since they never studied, you can't say the 'vaccine' was in any way related.
ransomnote wrote: “A key problem, in fact an insurmountable one, is that according to the literature, the ‘vaccine’ was based on a computer generated model of the virus, not actual isolated samples of the Covid19 virus.”
DugwayDuke wrote: Actual samples of the virus were available as early as Dec 2019.
ransomnote wrote: The CDC said no isolated samples of the virus were available. The timeline I posted before, and Fauci's statments, show that Moderna, and other pharmas, based the vaccine on the genomic model released by China.
ransomnote wrote: “Then, to test whether the Covid19 vaccine was actually working, they used a PCR test with a 100% false positive rate, because according to the CDC,...”
DugwayDuke wrote: Here’s the CDC guidance on using the PCR test.
CDC Guidance on PCR Test Accuracy:
- The CDC generally considers PCR tests to be very accurate, especially in identifying the presence of SARS-CoV-2 (the virus that causes COVID-19).
- They are often referred to as the “gold standard” for COVID-19 testing due to their high sensitivity (ability to detect the virus) and specificity (ability to distinguish it from other viruses).
- The Nebraska Medicine Omaha, NE explains that the PCR test was extraordinarily accurate in identifying SARS-CoV-2.
ransomnote wrote: And yet according to the CDC, isolated samples (not actual - isolated samples) of the Virus were 'unavailable' when the PCR was developed. The CDC said the PCR for Covid19 was designed to identify a 'related coronavirus'.
| CDC 2019-Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel [inludes my remarks, images from document, and the download link for the document] fda.gov ^ | 07/21/2021 | CDC/DDID/NCIRD/ Division of Viral Diseases Posted on 7/30/2021, 11:40:55 PM by ransomnote | ||
| CDC Withdraws Use of PCR Test for COVID and Finally Admits the Test Can Not Differentiate Between the Flu and COVID Virus | ||
12/29/2021 10:20:04 AM PST · by Hojczyk · 110 replies GP ^ | December 29, 2021 at 9:10am | By Jim Hoft | ||
| Labcorp has ramped up FAKE fraudulent Bird Flu tests in the U.S. | the PCR process is not a diagnostic test, but is used to create pandemics on demand. | ||
03/28/2025 1:09:54 AM PDT · by ransomnote · 28 replies X.com ^ | 2/15/2025 | Tony Seruga | ||
| COVID PCR Test Useless Says Report By 22 Highly Qualified Specialists | ||
12/08/2021 6:19:23 PM PST · by Fractal Trader · 65 replies Principia Scientific [UK] ^ | 8 December 2021 | ||
ransomnote wrote: “Numerous. I posted about them in 2020 through 2023. Go ahead and look through my profile.”
DugwayDuke wrote: IIRC, all, or almost all of those who were subject to disciplinary action and whose medical licenses were revoked, were, in fact, dispensing factual information on the virus/vaccines.
ransomnote wrote: Most were warning the public about side effects they witnessed. One just had the termerity to ask the medical board why his patients were experiencing rates of adverse events far higher than those published by pharmas (i.e., Dr. Charles Hoffe). His medical license was threatened, hospital rights removed (cut in income 50%), and somehow his clinic burned to the ground (coincidence?). That made him angry enough to dig in to find out what could trigger such aggressive censorship. Articles posted about Hoffe's work were posted to FR here:
https://freerepublic.com/focus/search?m=all;o=time;q=quick;s=hoffe
DugwayDuke wrote: Take for example Stella Immanuel
- who “claimed HCL cured COVID. She also claimed that alien DNA was being used in medical treatments, and that scientists were cooking up a vaccine to prevent people from being religious.”
ransomnote wrote: Trump also said Hydrocloroquine was a suitable treatment for Covid19 as did Fauci himself; they agreed with Stella Immanuel. They only focused on the folk medicine she practiced in Africa, and not her actual success in treating high risk patients with HQ at a time when the CDC said there were no treatments. She also said she believed Congress critters were taking HCQ - they had to destroy her to keep the con going.
ransomnote wrote: Lots of information supported the use of HCQ.
Research Studies Regarding the Safety and Efficacy of HCQ
DugwayDuke wrote: - “Some of her other claims include blaming medical conditions on witches and demons - a common enough belief among some evangelical Christians - though she says they have sex with people in a dream world.”
“They turn into a woman and then they sleep with the man and collect his sperm… then they turn into the man and they sleep with a man and deposit the sperm and reproduce more of themselves,”
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-africa-53579773
ransomnote wrote: Stella was correct re HCQ and she was right when she said that members of Congress were no doubt taking HCQ privately. Why is it no one cared about Fauci's disastrous HIV work and yet followed him like he was the demigod the MSM claimed?
ransomnote wrote: “Here’s two examples of the bounty paid to those pushing the vax.”
DugwayDuke wrote: Those aren’t ‘bounties’ and of course health care professionals are paid for dispensing medicines.
ransomnote wrote: A bounty is a specific type of incentive that offers a monetary reward for achieving a particular goal, often related to locating or capturing someone or something (in this case, patients).
Here's two examples of the bounty paid to those pushing the vax. The more patients they vaxxed, the higher their incentive pay.
| EXPOSED: In New Zealand, Doctors Receive 'Perverse' Monetary Incentives to Vaccinate,'Hush Money' Paid to Victims' Families | ||
12/20/2021 10:03:49 PM PST · by SeekAndFind · 50 replies RAIR FOUNDATION ^ | 12/20/2021 | Amy Mek | ||
| Anthem Medical’s Vaxx-Incentive Plan Exposes How Much Doctors Got Paid to Push the Death Jabs | ||
08/10/2023 5:42:56 AM PDT · by DFG · 76 replies The Liberty Daily ^ | 08/10/2023 | JD Rucker | ||