Posted on 12/15/2022 7:28:28 AM PST by SeekAndFind
News has come out regarding the Moderna COVID-19 vaccine, courtesy of Judicial Watch. The watchdog group announced yesterday that it had obtained records from a FOIA lawsuit against the Food and Drug Administration, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and the National Institute for Allergy and Infectious Disease. The entities had failed to respond to a FOIA request filed in June of 2021 regarding “the biodistribution studies and related data for the Pfizer, Moderna and Johnson& Johnson COVID vaccines.”
Judicial Watch said that the records contained information…
…regarding data Moderna submitted to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) on its mRNA COVID-19 vaccine, which indicate a “statistically significant” number of rats were born with skeletal deformations after their mothers were injected with the vaccine. The documents also reveal Moderna elected not to conduct a number of standard pharmacological studies on the laboratory test animals.
Moderna submitted a Nonclinical Overview to the FDA to have its vaccine approved. Included in that overview was information that rats born to mothers that had been given the mRNA vaccine had skeletal abnormalities that included conditions such as “rib nodules” and “wavy ribs.” Moderna said the conditions were not considered “adverse.”
Whether or not this is significant for pregnant mothers who took the jab more than likely remains to be seen. In October of this year, the CDC said that COVID-19 vaccines were recommended for people six months and older, including pregnant and nursing mothers and women who are trying to become pregnant. According to the agency, getting COVID-19 could result in complications that could affect pregnancy and a baby’s development.
The point is that Moderna should have told us about the issue with the bone problems in the rats, and the FDA and CDC certainly should have told us.
(Excerpt) Read more at pjmedia.com ...
This just gets better and better.
RE: This just gets better and better.
Can’t Moderna’s response be — “Rats aren’t Humans. What’s Bad for rats, might not necessarily be bad for humans?”
My Body-—My Choice!
.
PureBlood but still affected
By Three Years of Tyranny.
There is a reason rats are used as test animals, namely bad side effects that show up in rats very often show up in humans. So nope.
I know. I was just being facetious. :)
what does “statistically significant” mean?
Coming to your state and city? Plotting and planning for the next pandemic, lockdowns, passports, digitally tracking you & your family.
Planning by Greasy Newscum & his band of Nazis in California Legislature, their Pandemic plans prove their Nazis as they mimic the CCP.
Attorney Exposes With FACTS What She Calls Covid Concentration Camp Being Built in California By Railroad
When one of the ‘scientists’ scratches his chin and says, “Hmmm? Thats gonna change things.”
Greater than the margin of error.
They cut the rats ears off to do toxicity accumulation and cell abnormality studies. One ear before study and one ear at certain points into the study.
oh...
and what is the margin of error?
Pfizer study on preggie woman got a 82% kill rate for the babies. And, STILL they want forward and Democrats applauded.
Rat babies got deformed? Geesh.
You aren’t rats, y’all. Seriously, knock it off.
RE: Pfizer study on preggie woman got a 82% kill rate for the babies.
Interesting! Can you share the link to the study or the news report here please? Thanks.
I have heard the Moderna executives had a management retreat at Roswell, NM just before they released the vaccine!!!
I wondered about that.
From what I heard humans taste much better with a certain spicy spike protein
Lol. I should have caught that. Well played. 😊
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=gsDlHprql-g
Listen at 29 min
\/
( hat tip to logi_cal869 )
For those who don’t like videos, the money quote in textual format:
https://totalityofevidence.com/timeline/peter-daszaks-prophetic-statement-to-nas-workshop/
“…until an infectious disease crisis is very real, present, and at an emergency threshold, it is often largely ignored. To sustain the funding base beyond the crisis… we need to increase public understanding of the need for MCMs such as a pan-influenza or pan-coronavirus vaccine.
A key driver is the media,
and the economics follow the hype.
We need to use that hype
to our advantage
to get to
the real issues.
Investors will respond if they see
profit
at the end of process…”
and
Peter Daszak in 2015 actually stated that “this entire exercise was a campaign of domestic TERROR to get the public to accept the universal vaccine platform using a know biological weapon.”
Bill Gates was in on it too.
\/
This RICO rabbit hole is decades deep.
There is another good source on this stuff found in the book
The Bodies Of Others
By
Naomi R Wolf
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.