Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

First Mission-Ready Skyraider II Arrives at Air Force Special Operations Command
Air & Space Forces Magazine ^ | April 3, 2025 | David Roza

Posted on 04/04/2025 3:31:01 PM PDT by Macho MAGA Man

Air Force Special Operations Command marked a new chapter with its latest aircraft April 3 when the first Skyraider II fully modified for military use arrived at Hurlburt Field, Fla.

A modified crop duster, the OA-1K will provide airborne eyes, ears, and precision fires to support ground troops in permissive airspace, just as its namesake, the A-1 Skyraider, did in the Korean and Vietnam Wars.

AFSOC commander Lt. Gen. Michael Conley said at the welcoming ceremony that the aircraft’s small maintenance footprint and ease of swapping out sensors, weapons, and communications equipment will play a key role in future conflicts.

“Skyraider II represents not just a new platform, but a modular solution to our national security needs,” he said, according to a press release. “It will redefine how we approach joint campaigning, crisis response and the evolving landscape of modern warfare.”

(Excerpt) Read more at airandspaceforces.com ...


TOPICS: Government; Military/Veterans; Society
KEYWORDS: aviation; cropduster; military; skyraider
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-64 next last
To: blackdog

“It’s a Pawnee. A crop duster ag plane.”

Air Tractor?


21 posted on 04/04/2025 4:00:48 PM PDT by dljordan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: pierrem15

“What ain’t we got?”

“We ain’t got nape!”


22 posted on 04/04/2025 4:01:08 PM PDT by Taxman (MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN! SUPPORT THE FAIRTAX!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: blackdog

nvm I found it... the title pic on the website I see the intake directly under the nose cone...


23 posted on 04/04/2025 4:05:30 PM PDT by sit-rep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: sit-rep

A turboprop engine is a jet engine facing backwards. Really.


24 posted on 04/04/2025 4:06:06 PM PDT by blackdog ((Z28.310) Be careful what you say. Your refrigerator may be listening & reporting you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Macho MAGA Man

You can’t fly a ground attack aircraft into airspace where they have a good chance of nailing you from above and below. Even the A-10 needs air cover and limited ground fire to survive.


25 posted on 04/04/2025 4:07:08 PM PDT by lurk (u)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blackdog

fully aware!! My daughter worked on E-2C Hawkeyes on the Reagan for 3 1/2 years out of Yokosuka...

Like I say, I didnt see the air intake on Candors pic so that threw me off...


26 posted on 04/04/2025 4:14:03 PM PDT by sit-rep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: pierrem15
I wonder if the heat signature of that engine is sufficient to get a lock by a MANPAD, unlike a jet.

I suspect the propwash would disperse the heat signature rapidly from anything but a rear aspect shot.

27 posted on 04/04/2025 4:18:06 PM PDT by pfflier
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: sit-rep
The Air Tractor AT-802 is anything but Mickey Mouse. It's a well-proven, rugged airframe with low operating costs, easy maintenance and ability to stage from short, rough strips. It's used extensively for crop dusting and fighting forest fires.

We see them flying over our house on Hayden Lake in Idaho during fire season. We've also watched them scooping water on the Pend Oreille River in North Idaho. You'll typically see from two to four following each other scooping water and dropping water or fire retardant. They are used extensively all over the world for fire fighting.

In the Western USA, they are operated by Aero Spray (Minnesota/Western U.S.), Dauntless Air (Idaho/Western U.S.), Conair Aerial Firefighting (U.S./Canada), United Aero Group (Montana/Western U.S.), and the U.S. Forest Service (Western U.S.) for fighting forest fires.

As of the latest available data, over 1,000 Air Tractor AT-802 aircraft have been produced. This milestone was celebrated in January 2023 when Air Tractor, Inc. marked the delivery of the 1,000th AT-802, a model that includes various configurations like the AT-802A and AT-802U. The AT-802 series, which kicked off with its first flight in October 1990, has seen steady production since 1993, driven by demand in agriculture, firefighting, and military roles. By 2019, serial number 802A-800 was delivered, and in 2020, 802A-900 went to Australia, showing a clip of about 100 units every few years in that stretch. Given the pace (roughly 30-50 units annually in recent years) and ongoing contracts, the total’s likely pushing 1,100-1,200 by now

Like the A-10 Warthog, the AT-802 isn't the prettiest plane, but "Form Follows Function" is the cardinal rule here. (I personally love the looks).

Watch it In Action

28 posted on 04/04/2025 4:20:13 PM PDT by ProtectOurFreedom (PDJT doesn’t just walk through the Valley of the Shadow of Death. He swaggers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Macho MAGA Man
“It's a crop duster on steroids.”

I don't understand putting hundreds of combat proven A-10s in the junkyard and adopting a crop duster to fly low and slow.

Air Force brass say MANPADs can pop-up anywhere and take down an A-10. Well, what will they do to a crop-duster?

The A-10s are paid for. They are in service. They have been upgraded to use stand-off missiles and bombs.

This doesn't make good sense.

29 posted on 04/04/2025 4:25:34 PM PDT by jeffersondem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DesertRhino

I remember that. It was in the first weeks of Rolling Thunder.


30 posted on 04/04/2025 4:26:13 PM PDT by xkaydet65
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: pfflier

Didn’t think of the propwash. Good point.


31 posted on 04/04/2025 4:29:06 PM PDT by pierrem15 ("Massacrez-les, car le seigneur connait les siens" )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: jeffersondem

I agree 👍


32 posted on 04/04/2025 4:29:30 PM PDT by Macho MAGA Man (The last two weren't balloons. One was a cylindrical object)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: ProtectOurFreedom

ok... sorry! seriously lol... they just seem to be a little lite in the ass for armament!

Candors pic is very perspective friendly and when I first seen it thought how bad ass it would be hearing that rumble like in the old Pratt & Whitneys or Rolls!!


33 posted on 04/04/2025 4:33:36 PM PDT by sit-rep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Macho MAGA Man

The Spad, version II…!!!!

The A1-E Skyraider was one bad ass bird.

Lots of ordnance on the hard points, long loiter time, and rugged as Hell…


34 posted on 04/04/2025 4:41:58 PM PDT by NFHale (The Second Amendment - By Any Means Necessary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sit-rep

“lite in the ass for armament”

That’s why it is spec’d for “permissive airspace” with little threats to it.


35 posted on 04/04/2025 4:46:42 PM PDT by ProtectOurFreedom (PDJT doesn’t just walk through the Valley of the Shadow of Death. He swaggers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: jeffersondem

These things are insanely cheap for a modern aerial platform and are intended for roles where the A-10 is overkill. This thing is extremely difficult to lock onto with most MANPADS and if a drone hits it, it’s cheap and easy to replace.

This is intended for a brushfire war or border defense, to free up the A-10s (or successor) for frontline service. Remember, the A-10 was originally supposed to be supplemented by lesser aircraft for less hot areas like the OV-10. All the A-10’s supporting aircraft are long gone and out of service now.

Something else to consider - this thing is off-the-shelf available. We can’t build new A-10s.


36 posted on 04/04/2025 4:52:22 PM PDT by Spktyr (Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: pierrem15

They can baffle it and try to mitigate it. But I would expect a MANPAD could lock on. Those two exhaust stacks on that PT-6 turboprop are sticking right out the side and those get cherry hot.


37 posted on 04/04/2025 5:00:12 PM PDT by DesertRhino (2016 Star Wars, 2020 The Empire Strikes Back, 2025... RETURN OF THE JEDI...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Yo-Yo

I used to work with a retired Warthog pilot. He would -really- get lit off when someone said he wasn’t a true fighter pilot.


38 posted on 04/04/2025 5:01:49 PM PDT by DesertRhino (2016 Star Wars, 2020 The Empire Strikes Back, 2025... RETURN OF THE JEDI...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: DesertRhino

The very similar A-29 Super Tucano has an existing combat record in Afghanistan and elsewhere (it’s a bit larger aircraft) - real world experience has shown that the prop diffuses the exhaust quite a lot and modern MANPADS that work off IR have significant problems guiding on them.


39 posted on 04/04/2025 5:06:31 PM PDT by Spktyr (Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Macho MAGA Man

Key phrase is “permissive airspace”.


40 posted on 04/04/2025 5:27:31 PM PDT by glorgau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-64 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson