Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

BREAKING: Radical Activist Obama Judge Blocks Trump’s Plan to Invoke Alien Enemies Act and Deport Venezuelan Nationals
Gateway Pundit ^ | March 15, 2025 | Jim Hoft

Posted on 03/15/2025 12:41:59 PM PDT by Macho MAGA Man

A radical federal judge has moved to block former President Donald Trump’s efforts to secure America’s borders and protect its citizens.

On Saturday, Chief Judge James E. Boasberg, an Obama-appointed leftist, granted a temporary restraining order to stop the Trump administration from deporting thousands of Venezuelan nationals under the Alien Enemies Act—an action well within the executive’s constitutional authority.

This outrageous ruling comes after far-left groups, including the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) and Democracy Forward, rushed to court in a desperate bid to shield illegal immigrants from deportation.

Their lawsuit, J.G.G. v. Trump, seeks to upend Trump’s lawful enforcement of immigration laws, arguing that invoking the Alien Enemies Act—a wartime measure historically used to remove hostile foreign nationals—is somehow “unprecedented” and “unlawful” during peacetime.

(Excerpt) Read more at thegatewaypundit.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 677presidents; acluterrorists; alienenemiesact; aliens; boasberg; boasbergisaterrorist; boasjerk; bukele; crossfirehurricane; deport; elsalvador; furrygovtplant; hofthatersarefaggots; hoftisafairy; hoftobsessedkaren; humblehomoshatehoft; interference; jamesboasberg; jamesboasjerk; jameseboasberg; jimmyboasjerk; judgewatch; judicialcoup; judicialmisconduct; nayibbukele; noauthority; nojurisdiction; obamajudge; obstruction; queerblog; queerstalker; rentagavel; rentajimmy; sabotage; sodomizedgunner; sodomizedkaren; steeledossier; trump; undermining
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 121-139 next last
To: hinckley buzzard

If they are overruled on appeal, they must take a refresher course on the Constitution. Then, they have to pass a test by 100% to continue in the branch or except retirement from law.


61 posted on 03/15/2025 2:34:16 PM PDT by Don_Ret_USAF ("No Government can survive Without The Trust Of The People."er)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Macho MAGA Man

They do not have the authority, it does not rust with the judiciary, in spite of what a few will say. Funny how those same people totally supported Barry, correctly pointing out where the authority rested, but now they forget.


62 posted on 03/15/2025 2:42:01 PM PDT by GrumpyOldGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hinckley buzzard

They keep getting overruled on appeal, but they slow things down.”

I wish that was true. By my count only 2 have been partially overruled. There are well over a dozen still in place
Including the one ordering tens of thousands of fired workers back on the taxpayer payrolls.


63 posted on 03/15/2025 2:45:07 PM PDT by gibsonguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Macho MAGA Man

Trump should go on TV before the nation and make his case how unconstitutional the radical judges are and that he’ll ignore their injunctions.”

They will not give him the airtime just like the first term. Trump is going to have to go Jackson soon.


64 posted on 03/15/2025 2:47:35 PM PDT by gibsonguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Macho MAGA Man

It’s gotten to the point he sure probably needs to ignore when he can


65 posted on 03/15/2025 2:49:08 PM PDT by wardaddy (Joy, can you cook fried chicken?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Macho MAGA Man

DOGE him, this guy is dirty as hell


66 posted on 03/15/2025 2:53:15 PM PDT by blitz128
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Macho MAGA Man

He needs to quote Andrew Jackson: He’s made his ruling, let him try to enforce it.


67 posted on 03/15/2025 2:53:42 PM PDT by Feckless (The US Gubbmint / This Tagline CENSORED by FR \ IrOnic, ain't it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Macho MAGA Man

Transport these fine visitors to the front of this judge’s house. Supply some beer.


68 posted on 03/15/2025 2:57:56 PM PDT by Mark (DONATE ONCE every 3 months-is that a big deal?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Macho MAGA Man

It will be voided by an appeal court.

Presidential power of this sort cannot be nullified by the courts.


69 posted on 03/15/2025 2:58:47 PM PDT by Candor7 (Ask not for whom the Trump Trolls,He trolls for thee!<img src="" width=500</img><a href="">tag</a>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Macho MAGA Man

It is well within the President’s power to invoke the act and to see it carried out.


70 posted on 03/15/2025 3:08:52 PM PDT by lastchance (Cognovit Dominus qui sunt eius.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: falcon99

No personal reference to you intended...

71 posted on 03/15/2025 3:12:42 PM PDT by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Macho MAGA Man
IMG-5431
72 posted on 03/15/2025 3:13:13 PM PDT by wardaddy (Joy, can you cook fried chicken?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Macho MAGA Man

These guys would put the wood in Earl Warren’s boxers wouldn’t they?


73 posted on 03/15/2025 3:14:53 PM PDT by wardaddy (Joy, can you cook fried chicken?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lastchance
We cannot have a President who has every order within the executive branch blocked by some obscure low-level judge. Or even by the Supreme Court. This is solely the purview of the President of the United States.
74 posted on 03/15/2025 3:15:45 PM PDT by gitmo (If your theology doesn’t become your biography, what good is it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: Macho MAGA Man

Well then illegals can enjoy a stay at club Gitmo until this is overturned.


75 posted on 03/15/2025 3:17:22 PM PDT by datricker (Go Trump/Vance! Available now with Musk - who's got big balls? We've got big balls)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Macho MAGA Man

Another Deep State judge


76 posted on 03/15/2025 3:28:09 PM PDT by butlerweave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Governor Dinwiddie

Each other’s

It’s a group thing


77 posted on 03/15/2025 3:31:42 PM PDT by cableguymn (They don't want peace they want skeletons )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Sarah Barracuda
If this is how it works,...

Ignore the damned judges then. If Democrats will not follow rule of law, then neither they nor their clientele will be protected by law.

It is bad times coming. So be it. We cannot survive with a system where Republicans must follow "laws" which Democrats can freely ignore or change at a whim.

78 posted on 03/15/2025 3:31:49 PM PDT by flamberge (The times, they are a' changing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Macho MAGA Man

Demorats just contiue to prove they’ve been abusing our Justice system for a very long time....they’re still doing it!


79 posted on 03/15/2025 3:41:31 PM PDT by caww (O death, when you seized my Lord, you lost your grip on me......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bort
It is simply not surprising that a judge would stop the government from deporting the plaintiffs until the judge has adequate time to determine whether such deportation is legal or illegal.

And it is simply no surprising that a Democrat judge would order a halt to an executive order from a Republican President. "Laws" have nothing to do with this order.

And where is Rule 65? In Federal orders for an injunction of for immediate relief the requesting party most post a bond to cover the costs of the defendants' legal expenses if the plaintiff loses the case. That bond for this case would also need to cover the estimated costs of jailing the Venezuelans, releasing the Venezuelans, and the costs of any crimes the Venezuelans might commit after release.

That is what happens when a plaintiff loses a case for immediate injunctions. They lose the bond amount. The court is not allowed to set the bond at some nominal amount either; it must be according to expected "reasonable and customary" expenses.

That is the law. It is a long-settled law that has been completely ignored for every one of these injunctions from the Democrat judges.

Laws? The Democrats don't need no stinking laws.

This court order is completely illegitimate and should be ignored.

80 posted on 03/15/2025 3:46:48 PM PDT by flamberge (The times, they are a' changing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 121-139 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson