Posted on 11/08/2024 3:55:22 PM PST by Diana in Wisconsin
No matter how bad you think Covid policies were, they were intended to be worse.
Consider the vaccine passports alone. Six cities were locked down to include only the vaccinated in public indoor places. They were New York City, Boston, Chicago, New Orleans, Washington, D.C., and Seattle. The plan was to enforce this with a vaccine passport. It broke. Once the news leaked that the shot didn’t stop infection or transmission, the planners lost public support and the scheme collapsed.
It was undoubtedly planned to be permanent and nationwide if not worldwide. Instead, the scheme had to be dialed back.
Features of the CDC’s edicts did incredible damage. It imposed the rent moratorium. It decreed the ridiculous “six feet of distance” and mask mandates. It forced Plexiglas as the interface for commercial transactions. It implied that mail-in balloting must be the norm, which probably flipped the election. It delayed the reopening as long as possible. It was sadistic.
Even with all that, worse was planned. On July 26, 2020, with the George Floyd riots having finally settled down, the CDC issued a plan for establishing nationwide quarantine camps. People were to be isolated, given only food and some cleaning supplies. They would be banned from participating in any religious services. The plan included contingencies for preventing suicide. There were no provisions made for any legal appeals or even the right to legal counsel.
The plan’s authors were unnamed but included 26 footnotes. It was completely official. The document was only removed on about March 26, 2023. During the entire intervening time, the plan survived on the CDC’s public site with little to no public notice or controversy.
It was called “Interim Operational Considerations for Implementing the Shielding Approach to Prevent COVID-19 Infections in Humanitarian Settings.”
“This document presents considerations from the perspective of the U.S. Centers for Disease Control & Prevention (CDC) for implementing the shielding approach in humanitarian settings as outlined in guidance documents focused on camps, displaced populations and low-resource settings. This approach has never been documented and has raised questions and concerns among humanitarian partners who support response activities in these settings. The purpose of this document is to highlight potential implementation challenges of the shielding approach from CDC’s perspective and guide thinking around implementation in the absence of empirical data. Considerations are based on current evidence known about the transmission and severity of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and may need to be revised as more information becomes available.”
By absence of empirical data, the meaning is: nothing like this has ever been tried. The point of the document was to map out how it could be possible and alert authorities to possible pitfalls to be avoided.
The meaning of “shielding” is “to reduce the number of severe Covid-19 cases by limiting contact between individuals at higher risk of developing severe disease (‘high-risk’) and the general population (‘low-risk’). High-risk individuals would be temporarily relocated to safe or ‘green zones’ established at the household, neighborhood, camp/sector, or community level depending on the context and setting. They would have minimal contact with family members and other low-risk residents.”
In other words, this is what used to be concentration camps.
Who are these people who would be rounded up? They are “older adults and people of any age who have serious underlying medical conditions.” Who determines this? Public health authorities. The purpose? The CDC explains: “physically separating high-risk individuals from the general population” allows authorities “to prioritize the use of the limited available resources.”
This sounds a lot like condemning people to death in the name of protecting them.
The model establishes three levels. First is the household level. Here high-risk people are“physically isolated from other household members.” That alone is objectionable. Elders need people to take care of them. They need love and to be surrounded by family. The CDC should never imagine that it would intervene in households to force old people into separate places.
The model jumps from households to the “neighborhood level.” Here we have the same approach: forced separation of those deemed vulnerable.
From there, the model jumps again to the “camp/sector level.” Here it is different. “A group of shelters such as schools, community buildings within a camp/sector (max 50 high-risk individuals per single green zone) where high-risk individuals are physically isolated together. One entry point is used for exchange of food, supplies, etc. A meeting area is used for residents and visitors to interact while practicing physical distancing (2 meters). No movement into or outside the green zone.”
Continues at link...
They may not have been named, but as in all bureaucratic systems there are paper trails.
And petty tyrants crave adulation for their actions and braggadocio is usually their trail.
Somebody always talks.
I think government agencies that come up with plans like this should be required to have all the staff that wrote it up sign it.
The head of the CDC seems like a good start for finding out who planned and wrote this abomination.
This is the type of crap the Second Amendment was created for upon the founding of our nation. Our founding fathers were smart enough to realize that times change and on an issue which would have previously been considered “no one would even consider an action such as that”, can quickly turn into “this is a good idea”. They wanted to insure that such an action couldn’t happen here because the people would always be armed to defend their freedoms.
In places such as Australia, they would have no problem in implementing such a plan, actually did it in some areas, and were on the path to enforce it country wide.
Dewy Gasom and How
Yes, you read that correctly. The CDC is here proposing concentration camps for the sick or anyone they deem to be in danger of medically significant consequences of infection.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Obviously a globalist, anti-American organization that should be given a set of operating instructions by President Trump, and its activities subject to review by a Congressional standing committee.
I hope that RFK isn’t on board with this concept. Maybe someone should ask him.
These would have quickly become death camps particularly
without any provision for medical care. Nursing homes showed very high mortality rates even with a modicum of medical care so these camps would have become like the mefieval.pest houses
You;re right. It would have been horrific at the very least.
I am so sorry to hear this, Diana. Those a-holes wouldn’t let my brother’s wife or children be with him on his deathbed, even though all were vaccinated, and as you say, did everything they were told to do. He died all alone, like your father. That kills me to this day.
My brother was probably the nicest person you would ever meet. We are 3+ years out, and it’s still fresh. I keep his prayer card with his favorite prayer in my wallet. Whenever I pull out my credit card, the Prayer of St. Francis is staring at me. One side has the prayer, and the other has one of my brother’s latest photos before he passed.
Fauci and company have so much to answer for, IMHO.
Are we supposed to believe that this is the result of the “vaccines”? The totally bullsh*t, utterly useless “vaccines”? Or is it “herd immunity”? Because if it is, why was ANY of the crap we were put through, necessary?
Many people need to be in prison or the ground for what they did.
I’m so sorry. This was an extreme injustice that I never thought I’d see in “land of the free, home of the brave” America.
I didn’t know your family went through this, too! All the more reason we need to be VIGILANT and MAGA from now until the end of time!
Yes, there will always be setbacks, but Man-o-MAN, did this last election send a message! Quisling RINOs are shaking in their boots! Get on the Trump Train or get left behind, Losers! We are 4 years behind where we should be...which was STILL undoing all the BS Socialist Democrats put us through in the past.
They’ll be back - but I’m hoping and praying that Brandon was their last go-round in my lifetime. Ugh! What a waste of time, money, blood and treasure we’ve been through this past decade!
Enough, already! We are SO much SMARTER than this!
I know personally of two other families who were deprived of being with their loved ones on their deathbeds. It slays me. I don’t know who made those decisions. I suspect Fauci did. They ripped our hearts out. I can forgive if someone asks for forgiveness, and sometimes even when they don’t. I don’t think I’ll ever forget this though. I will be in jail before I let this happen again.
They keep courting CWII.
One day, they will get it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.