G7 diplomats say Biden ‘worst he’s ever been.’

Twitter / X / Citizen's Free Press ^ | June 14, 2024 | Staff

[Red Badger]

Worrying scoop from G7 as diplomatic source tells me Biden “losing focus” in world leader sessions here in Italy.

Another says “it’s worst he’s even been” at an international summit….

https://thesun.co.uk/news/28495274/joe-biden-freezes-again-shuffling-g7-giorgia-meloni/

VIDEO AT LINK...................

[Lazamataz]

I’m leaving aside any demonstrable points except the 800-lb-Gorilla-In-The-Room... his assertion that Trump got a fair trial, and in fact was treated with kid gloves, and his doubling-down on the assertion.

All we need is the one point. Anything else and he’ll change the subject to less clear points.

Hammer, only, this one clear issue.

I could have been an attorney. Seriously.

[kiryandil]

And that goes for the posse which you’re affiliated has gotten old. In addition stop “talking behind my back” either on the forum and in private messages.

Lookit the Democrat Party operative get all cheesed off that REAL freepers don't like him vomiting his Nicolle Wallace-Joe Scarborough PMSNBC Talking Points all over the forum.

=============

To: kiryandil
Sarah Palin was an effective conservative?

Reagan was an effective conservative. There is no comparison between Sarah and Reagan.

67 posted on 6/18/2024, 4:33:47 AM by joesbucks

=============

Back in 2010, 14 years ago, equating Sarah Palin with that Commie pile of dogsqueeze ZeroBama:

I’m afraid* of Sarah Palin for the same reasons I was afraid of Obama. 

Neither are the type of person I want leading the country and their results, 
while comimg from polar opposites of the political spectrum would largely be the same.

*If afraid is defined as concerned for the outcome for the country, then yes, I’m afraid.

9 posted on 7/11/2010, 12:38:56 PM by joesbucks

https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2550618/posts?page=9#9

[kiryandil]

I’m leaving aside any demonstrable points except the 800-lb-Gorilla-In-The-Room... his assertion that Trump got a fair trial, and in fact was treated with kid gloves, and his doubling-down on the assertion.

To: kiryandil

I believe Trump has had a fair trial. Should I be charged with crimes, I hope I would be treated as well as Trump.

148 posted on 5/29/2024, 11:06:08 PM by joesbucks
https://freerepublic.com/focus/news/4240700/posts?page=148#148

To: kiryandil

And I stand by that. If & when I’m ever in trial, I want to avoid being detained while awaiting booking, a tv while awaiting my verdict, a safe space to make my pronouncements after the days proceedings, a day off to attend my son’s graduation, no restrictions on travel, leniency (avoiding jail)while violating gag orders and others.

Was Mr. Weisselberg given the same considerations during his trials?

42 posted on 5/31/2024, 12:18:38 PM by joesbucks
https://freerepublic.com/focus/bloggers/4241288/posts?page=42#42

[kiryandil]

Interesting that he’s trying to deflect from Droolin’ Joe’s vacuous antics at the G-7 conference...

[Lazamataz]

The best and last hope is Trump? Wasn’t that what was said in 2020? That we couldn’t survive if he wasn’t re-elected? Well here we are with that same old song. And what happens after him?

I will not answer that. I will not debate someone so completely out of touch with reality, as I correctly have observed you are.

If you wish to address anything, please stay focused on the overall thrust of my message to include the four legal points.

[kiryandil]

President Trump, The Cleanest Guy in Washington, and his people are the only ones being prosecuted by a corrupt system and criminal politicians.

You've [joesbucks] asserted and stood by the claim that Trump received a fair trial:

1. Despite the fact that he was tried in a very hostile region by a very hostile prosecutor and backed by a very hostile Biden administration official, and overseen by a very hostile judge.
2. Despite the fact he was tried for a crime he never even participated in, in ANY way....and was held accountable for a subordinate making a journal entry in a ledger that New York took issue with
3. Despite the fact that the jury instruction was utterly in opposition to SCOTUS rulings, that all elements of a prosecution must be agreed up completely before a guilty verdict is read out
4. Despite the fact that the predicate crimes (that were supposedly why New York alleged fraud in pursuit of those crimes) yet these predicate crimes where not even accused, much less proven... and yet the jury was allowed to assume the predicate crimes were true.

Further, you not only assert Trump had a fair trial, but you even claim he was treated with kid gloves.

Yes, let us concentrate on the Four Points.

I expect more deflection.

[piytar]

My lawyer friend says your points are accurate.

Oh I have a new saying that’s getting some traction: “Bye Bye Biden.” 😂

[Jim Robinson]

There is a time for everything. There’s a time to debate. There is a time to ignore. there’s a time to pray.

[joesbucks]

What’s to address? What’s changed except the distributor of 2000 Mules pulled the product off the market because of the misrepresentation issue. All the rest stands as is. And you’re blinded by that. But I am open to facts that show 2020 was stolen. And by how many actual ballots.

As to my earlier response, we heard the “last hope” song in 2020. And yet here we are. Still standing. And no one has who the successor to MAGA is after Trump. Nobody can tell me what America returns to when it’s great again.

[Lazamataz]

What’s to address? What’s changed except the distributor of 2000 Mules pulled the product off the market because of the misrepresentation issue. All the rest stands as is. And you’re blinded by that. But I am open to facts that show 2020 was stolen. And by how many actual ballots.

I will not answer that. I will not debate someone so completely out of touch with reality, as I correctly have observed you are.

If you wish to address anything, please stay focused on the overall thrust of my message (that it is pointless to debate or in any way argue with someone who believes that Trump had a fair trial.

The legal points to address are, once again:

You've asserted and stood by the claim that Trump received a fair trial:

1. Despite the fact that he was tried in a very hostile region by a very hostile prosecutor and backed by a very hostile Biden administration official, and overseen by a very hostile judge.
2. Despite the fact he was tried for a crime he never even participated in, in ANY way....and was held accountable for a subordinate making a journal entry in a ledger that New York took issue with
3. Despite the fact that the jury instruction was utterly in opposition to SCOTUS rulings, that all elements of a prosecution must be agreed up completely before a guilty verdict is read out
4. Despite the fact that the predicate crimes (that were supposedly why New York alleged fraud in pursuit of those crimes) yet these predicate crimes where not even accused, much less proven... and yet the jury was allowed to assume the predicate crimes were true.

Further, you not only assert Trump had a fair trial, but you even claim he was treated with kid gloves. to include the four legal points.

As to my earlier response, we heard the “last hope” song in 2020. And yet here we are. Still standing. And no one has who the successor to MAGA is after Trump. Nobody can tell me what America returns to when it’s great again.

I will not answer that. I will not debate someone so completely out of touch with reality, as I correctly have observed you are.

Please read the above for items I will answer, once you attempt to counter them. Please do so in their entirety.

If this was court, your answers so far would be deemed as Non-Responsive and the judge would admonish you.

[Lazamataz]

Yessir, we discussed this together. I defer, always, to your judgement. This forum has been a success because of your judgement calls.

[joesbucks]

Reagan was an effective voice and leader. And never imploded.

[joesbucks]

You’re not above answering it. You won’t answer because YOU CAN’T. There is no answer to Rudy’s plea about Ruby & Shay. No answer to Lindel’s farce. No answer to Arizona. No answer to the Mules implosion. No answer to the Michigan House hearings. I won’t waste my time on others.

[Cold_Red_Steel]

If their not careful the “fact-checkers” are gonna start quoting anonymous sources!

[Political Junkie Too]

That was hilarious when Macron had to gesture to Meloni to go fetch Biden back.

"I had custody of him last week. This is your week to have him."

-PJ

[kiryandil]

Reagan was an effective voice and leader. And never imploded.

Palin never imploded.

She was chased out of office by your howling Democrat Media mob and one of the very early forms of lawfare by your Democrat comrades, Comrade joesDemocrats.

===============

Let's get back to Laz's Four Points after your deflection about Reagan and Palin.

You've [joesbucks] asserted and stood by the claim that Trump received a fair trial:

1. Despite the fact that he was tried in a very hostile region by a very hostile prosecutor and backed by a very hostile Biden administration official, and overseen by a very hostile judge.
2. Despite the fact he was tried for a crime he never even participated in, in ANY way....and was held accountable for a subordinate making a journal entry in a ledger that New York took issue with
3. Despite the fact that the jury instruction was utterly in opposition to SCOTUS rulings, that all elements of a prosecution must be agreed up completely before a guilty verdict is read out
4. Despite the fact that the predicate crimes (that were supposedly why New York alleged fraud in pursuit of those crimes) yet these predicate crimes where not even accused, much less proven... and yet the jury was allowed to assume the predicate crimes were true.

Further, you not only assert Trump had a fair trial, but you even claim he was treated with kid gloves.

Why won't you rebut any of these Points?

[Cold_Red_Steel]

Folks say Creepy Joe uses Depends. How about you?

[MinorityRepublican]

Yeah we are not quite full-on Soviet yet but heading there.

We're already there.

[kiryandil]

Folks say Creepy Joe uses Depends. How about you?

It all Depends on whether joescucks gets trapped into answering Laz's Four Points about the Trump show trial in New Jerk shCitty...

=================

To: kiryandil

I believe Trump has had a fair trial. Should I be charged with crimes, I hope I would be treated as well as Trump.

148 posted on 5/29/2024, 11:06:08 PM by joesbucks
https://freerepublic.com/focus/news/4240700/posts?page=148#148

The Four Points

President Trump, The Cleanest Guy in Washington, and his people are the only ones being prosecuted by a corrupt system and criminal politicians.

You've [joesbucks] asserted and stood by the claim that Trump received a fair trial:

1. Despite the fact that he was tried in a very hostile region by a very hostile prosecutor and backed by a very hostile Biden administration official, and overseen by a very hostile judge.
2. Despite the fact he was tried for a crime he never even participated in, in ANY way....and was held accountable for a subordinate making a journal entry in a ledger that New York took issue with
3. Despite the fact that the jury instruction was utterly in opposition to SCOTUS rulings, that all elements of a prosecution must be agreed up completely before a guilty verdict is read out
4. Despite the fact that the predicate crimes (that were supposedly why New York alleged fraud in pursuit of those crimes) yet these predicate crimes where not even accused, much less proven... and yet the jury was allowed to assume the predicate crimes were true.

Further, you not only assert Trump had a fair trial, but you even claim he was treated with kid gloves.