Replies

What’s to address? What’s changed except the distributor of 2000 Mules pulled the product off the market because of the misrepresentation issue. All the rest stands as is. And you’re blinded by that. But I am open to facts that show 2020 was stolen. And by how many actual ballots.

I will not answer that. I will not debate someone so completely out of touch with reality, as I correctly have observed you are.

If you wish to address anything, please stay focused on the overall thrust of my message (that it is pointless to debate or in any way argue with someone who believes that Trump had a fair trial.

The legal points to address are, once again:

You've asserted and stood by the claim that Trump received a fair trial:

Despite the fact that he was tried in a very hostile region by a very hostile prosecutor and backed by a very hostile Biden administration official, and overseen by a very hostile judge.
Despite the fact he was tried for a crime he never even participated in, in ANY way....and was held accountable for a subordinate making a journal entry in a ledger that New York took issue with
Despite the fact that the jury instruction was utterly in opposition to SCOTUS rulings, that all elements of a prosecution must be agreed up completely before a guilty verdict is read out
Despite the fact that the predicate crimes (that were supposedly why New York alleged fraud in pursuit of those crimes) yet these predicate crimes where not even accused, much less proven... and yet the jury was allowed to assume the predicate crimes were true.

Further, you not only assert Trump had a fair trial, but you even claim he was treated with kid gloves. to include the four legal points.

As to my earlier response, we heard the “last hope” song in 2020. And yet here we are. Still standing. And no one has who the successor to MAGA is after Trump. Nobody can tell me what America returns to when it’s great again.

I will not answer that. I will not debate someone so completely out of touch with reality, as I correctly have observed you are.

Please read the above for items I will answer, once you attempt to counter them. Please do so in their entirety.

If this was court, your answers so far would be deemed as Non-Responsive and the judge would admonish you.

You’re not above answering it. You won’t answer because YOU CAN’T. There is no answer to Rudy’s plea about Ruby & Shay. No answer to Lindel’s farce. No answer to Arizona. No answer to the Mules implosion. No answer to the Michigan House hearings. I won’t waste my time on others.

The fact that he "doesn't know" who the "very hostile Biden administration official" that you refer to is tells me VOLUMES.

He's either trolling, or he gets all his news from the left-wing Media.

Gads. Not quite the Wobblies. By much...

https://freerepublic.com/focus/bloggers/4244262/posts?page=127#127