Skip to comments.
VIDEO: Will Mike Johnson UNBLUR Fed Faces on this New J6 Video?
Rumble ^
| January 26, 2024
| DUmmie FUnnies
Posted on 01/26/2024 8:29:12 AM PST by PJ-Comix
![](https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/53487860247_7f3f7a2e80_b.jpg)
VIDEO
This newly released J6 video of the NE lawn of the Capitol shows a couple of feds installing something (surveillance equipment?) on a tree at 9:30 AM. Mike Johnson, please UNBLUR the faces of these feds so they can be identified.
TOPICS: Conspiracy; Humor
KEYWORDS: feds; j6; j6video; mikejohnson
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-25 next last
So WHAT were they installing on that Capitol lawn tree?
1
posted on
01/26/2024 8:29:12 AM PST
by
PJ-Comix
To: Xenalyte; RMDupree; AlexW; CzarNicky; Mike Fieschko; motzman; codercpc; thingumbob; tje; ml1954; ...
2
posted on
01/26/2024 8:30:11 AM PST
by
PJ-Comix
(Yes, I am the Toxic Troll Terminator)
To: PJ-Comix
Its just a blurry video. Their faces haven’t been intentionally blurred or redacted. Mike Johnson doesn’t have the ability to alter it any more than anyone else.
3
posted on
01/26/2024 8:32:36 AM PST
by
ElkGroveDan
(My tagline is in the shop.)
To: PJ-Comix
LOOK! A SQUIRREL!.......................
4
posted on
01/26/2024 8:33:09 AM PST
by
Red Badger
(Homeless veterans camp in the streets while illegal aliens are put up in hotels.....................)
To: PJ-Comix
It doesn’t matter whether the faces are blurred due to low resolution or if they were blurred by software, it takes some very sophisticated software to enhance something like this. The one advantage you have is that it is video, and good software can build detail by comparing many frames.
5
posted on
01/26/2024 8:39:57 AM PST
by
z3n
(Kakistocracy)
To: ElkGroveDan
Its just a blurry video. Their faces haven’t been intentionally blurred or redacted. Mike Johnson doesn’t have the ability to alter it any more than anyone else. According to what I read, those faces were INTENTIONALLY blurred.
6
posted on
01/26/2024 8:41:15 AM PST
by
PJ-Comix
(Yes, I am the Toxic Troll Terminator)
To: z3n
The one advantage you have is that it is video, and good software can build detail by comparing many frames. I'm sure the video from the Dome camera is high res. BTW, we do know that the video of the J5/6 pipe bomber when he was sitting on a bench outside the DNC was INTENTIONALLY made so low res that even the lousiest cameras on the market are not even that low resolution.
7
posted on
01/26/2024 8:43:56 AM PST
by
PJ-Comix
(Yes, I am the Toxic Troll Terminator)
To: ElkGroveDan
Yeah, it’s just a blurry video/picture, ok /s
8
posted on
01/26/2024 8:53:40 AM PST
by
bantam
To: PJ-Comix
9
posted on
01/26/2024 8:53:41 AM PST
by
smokingfrog
( sleep with one eye open (<o> --- )
To: PJ-Comix
That is true. I haven’t posted multi-media content in a looogn time but I know that back in the day, just about anything you uploaded to youtube, or wherever, got heavily compressed in order to lower the bandwidth consumption and increase streaming speeds. The original material is likely much higher res
10
posted on
01/26/2024 8:54:16 AM PST
by
z3n
(Kakistocracy)
To: PJ-Comix
That’s what I remember too...and believe it’s to protect people from the insane nuts who want everyone there jailed...
To: PJ-Comix
Un-blur them, and post at Eagle Pass, TX, and on every lamp post in Texas, too.
12
posted on
01/26/2024 9:16:14 AM PST
by
traditional2
(lets go B*and*n)
To: ElkGroveDan
From a 1986 VCR tape, played on a CRT color TV set.
13
posted on
01/26/2024 9:17:52 AM PST
by
OKSooner
("You won't like what comes after America." - Leonard Cohen.)
To: ElkGroveDan
That’s weird because Mike Jonathan said he was going to blur the faces.
14
posted on
01/26/2024 9:18:45 AM PST
by
roving
(Deplorable Listless Vessel Trumpist With Trumpitis and a Rainbow Bully)
To: OKSooner
Remember trying to rub one out with that setup? Yeah, me neither. :)
15
posted on
01/26/2024 9:22:50 AM PST
by
JohnnyP
(Thinking is hard work (I stole that from Rush).)
To: PJ-Comix
Anyone could put a wireless trail camera there. I wonder if it would function and if it’s against the law.
16
posted on
01/26/2024 9:23:45 AM PST
by
old-ager
To: ElkGroveDan
He most certainly does. He said he was holding videos until the faces could be blurred.
17
posted on
01/26/2024 9:24:15 AM PST
by
McGavin999
( A sense of humor is a sign of intelligence, leftists have no sense of humor, therefore……)
To: ElkGroveDan
Nobody can tell from this one image what the original resolution was.
When an entire image is blurred, so are the faces.
18
posted on
01/26/2024 9:25:01 AM PST
by
old-ager
To: PJ-Comix
May I ask what is wrong with Feds installing surveillance equipment on the Capitol grounds?
19
posted on
01/26/2024 9:39:20 AM PST
by
Fester Chugabrew
(In a world of parrots and lemmings, be a watchdog.)
To: Fester Chugabrew
May I ask what is wrong with Feds installing surveillance equipment on the Capitol grounds? On the morning of J6? They couldn't have done it at another time?
20
posted on
01/26/2024 9:46:05 AM PST
by
PJ-Comix
(Yes, I am the Toxic Troll Terminator)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-25 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson